本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

hipaa-security-rule

Implements HIPAA Security Rule technical safeguards under 45 CFR §164.312 for electronic protected health information. Covers access controls with unique user identification, emergency access procedures, automatic logoff, encryption, audit controls, integrity controls, and transmission security. Keywords: HIPAA Security Rule, ePHI, access controls, encryption, audit controls, technical safeguards.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md15.9 KB
  • assets/template.md3.6 KB
  • references/standards.md3.6 KB
  • references/workflows.md8.5 KB
  • scripts/process.py19.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

HIPAA Security Rule — Technical Safeguards 45 CFR §164.312

Overview

The HIPAA Security Rule establishes national standards for protecting electronic protected health information (ePHI) that is created, received, used, or maintained by a covered entity or business associate. Published as a final rule on February 20, 2003 (68 FR 8334), with compliance required by April 20, 2005 (April 20, 2006 for small health plans), the Security Rule operationalizes the Privacy Rule's confidentiality protections through administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. The rule adopts a risk-based, technology-neutral approach — it specifies what must be achieved but allows flexibility in how covered entities implement protections based on their size, complexity, and capabilities.

The Security Rule applies only to ePHI, unlike the Privacy Rule which covers PHI in all forms. The rule organizes its requirements into three safeguard categories (administrative §164.308, physical §164.310, technical §164.312) plus organizational requirements (§164.314) and policies/procedures/documentation (§164.316).

Technical Safeguards — §164.312

Technical safeguards are the technology and related policies and procedures that protect ePHI and control access to it. Each standard has required implementation specifications (mandatory) and addressable implementation specifications (must be implemented if reasonable and appropriate, with documented rationale if an alternative measure is adopted or the specification is not implemented).

Access Control — §164.312(a)(1)

Standard: Implement technical policies and procedures for electronic information systems that maintain ePHI to allow access only to those persons or software programs that have been granted access rights.

Implementation SpecificationTypeRequirement
Unique User Identification — §164.312(a)(2)(i)RequiredAssign a unique name and/or number for identifying and tracking user identity
Emergency Access Procedure — §164.312(a)(2)(ii)RequiredEstablish and implement procedures for obtaining necessary ePHI during an emergency
Automatic Logoff — §164.312(a)(2)(iii)AddressableImplement electronic procedures that terminate an electronic session after a predetermined time of inactivity
Encryption and Decryption — §164.312(a)(2)(iv)AddressableImplement a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt ePHI

Unique User Identification

Every workforce member, administrator, and system account accessing ePHI must have a unique identifier. Shared accounts and generic logins are prohibited.

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Active Directory assigns unique user IDs in the format [first initial][last name][employee number] (e.g., jsmith4821)
  • Service accounts for application-to-application communication use the format svc-[application]-[function] (e.g., svc-epic-hl7)
  • Privileged administrative accounts are separate from standard user accounts (adm-jsmith4821)
  • All user accounts are tied to the HR system — terminated employees are automatically disabled within 1 hour of separation processing
  • Biometric authentication (fingerprint) is deployed at clinical workstations for single sign-on
  • Multi-factor authentication is required for remote access and administrative functions

Emergency Access Procedure

Covered entities must have documented procedures for accessing ePHI during emergencies when normal access controls cannot function.

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Break-the-glass procedures allow any clinician to access any patient record during declared emergencies
  • Break-the-glass events generate immediate alerts to the Privacy Office and require post-event justification within 24 hours
  • Disaster recovery accounts with elevated privileges are maintained in sealed envelopes in the IT Operations Center safe
  • Emergency access accounts are tested quarterly and passwords rotated after each test or use
  • The EHR system maintains a separate emergency mode with simplified authentication (badge + PIN) activated during IT system failures

Automatic Logoff

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Clinical workstations: 5-minute inactivity timeout with screen lock, 15-minute session termination
  • Administrative workstations: 10-minute inactivity timeout with screen lock, 30-minute session termination
  • Patient portal sessions: 15-minute inactivity timeout with session termination
  • Mobile devices (tablets on clinical carts): 2-minute inactivity lock, requiring biometric re-authentication
  • Proximity-based logoff using RFID badges — session locks when clinician's badge moves more than 10 feet from the workstation

Encryption and Decryption

Although addressable, OCR has consistently found that failing to encrypt ePHI without documented equivalent alternative measures constitutes a Security Rule violation.

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Data at rest: AES-256 encryption on all storage volumes containing ePHI (database tablespace encryption, full disk encryption on endpoints)
  • Data in transit: TLS 1.2 minimum (TLS 1.3 preferred) for all network communications containing ePHI
  • Database field-level encryption for highly sensitive fields (SSN, substance abuse diagnoses, HIV status, mental health notes)
  • Encryption key management through a FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validated hardware security module (HSM)
  • Key rotation: Annual for data-at-rest keys, per-session for TLS, quarterly for application-level encryption keys

Audit Controls — §164.312(b)

Standard: Implement hardware, software, and/or procedural mechanisms that record and examine activity in information systems that contain or use ePHI.

No implementation specifications are designated — the standard itself is required.

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

What is logged:

  • All authentication events (successful and failed logins, logoffs, account lockouts)
  • All access to ePHI (reads, writes, modifications, deletions) including the specific records accessed
  • All administrative actions (user creation, privilege changes, configuration modifications)
  • All system events (startup, shutdown, errors, backup operations)
  • All network events involving ePHI systems (connections, disconnections, firewall events)
  • Break-the-glass access events with enhanced detail

Log management:

  • Centralized log aggregation using SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) platform
  • Real-time correlation and alerting for suspicious patterns (multiple failed logins, unusual access volumes, after-hours access to records outside care team)
  • Immutable log storage — logs are write-once to prevent tampering
  • Log retention: minimum 6 years (aligned with HIPAA documentation retention requirement under §164.530(j))
  • Daily automated log review reports provided to the Security Operations Center
  • Monthly audit sample: random selection of 50 patient records reviewed for access appropriateness

Audit triggers and alerts:

TriggerResponse SLAAction
5+ failed login attempts in 10 minutesImmediateAccount lockout, alert to SOC
Access to VIP/employee patient recordsImmediateAlert to Privacy Office for review
Bulk record access (>50 records in 1 hour by single user)15 minutesSOC review, possible account suspension
After-hours access from unusual location1 hourReview by SOC next business day or immediate if high risk
Break-the-glass event24 hoursPrivacy Office justification review
Administrative privilege escalationImmediateSOC verification of change ticket

Integrity — §164.312(c)(1)

Standard: Implement policies and procedures to protect ePHI from improper alteration or destruction.

Implementation SpecificationTypeRequirement
Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI — §164.312(c)(2)AddressableImplement electronic mechanisms to corroborate that ePHI has not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Database integrity: SHA-256 checksums on clinical document records; tamper-evident logging of all modifications
  • Append-only clinical documentation model — original entries are never deleted or overwritten; amendments are linked to original records with author, timestamp, and reason
  • Digital signatures on laboratory results, radiology reports, and medication orders using PKI certificates
  • Daily integrity verification scans comparing file checksums against known-good baselines
  • Backup integrity verification: automated restore testing of randomly selected backup sets weekly

Person or Entity Authentication — §164.312(d)

Standard: Implement procedures to verify that a person or entity seeking access to ePHI is the one claimed. This standard is required with no implementation specifications.

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • Internal workforce: Multi-factor authentication (badge + PIN for workstations; authenticator app + password for remote)
  • External providers (Health Information Exchange): Digital certificate-based mutual TLS authentication
  • Patient portal: Knowledge-based authentication for enrollment; username + password + SMS/email verification code for ongoing access
  • Business associates accessing Asclepius systems: VPN with certificate + password + hardware token
  • Application-to-application: OAuth 2.0 with client credentials and mutual TLS

Transmission Security — §164.312(e)(1)

Standard: Implement technical security measures to guard against unauthorized access to ePHI that is being transmitted over an electronic communications network.

Implementation SpecificationTypeRequirement
Integrity Controls — §164.312(e)(2)(i)AddressableImplement security measures to ensure electronically transmitted ePHI is not improperly modified without detection
Encryption — §164.312(e)(2)(ii)AddressableImplement a mechanism to encrypt ePHI whenever deemed appropriate

Asclepius Health Network Implementation:

  • All internal network traffic containing ePHI is encrypted using TLS 1.2+ (network segmentation with ePHI VLAN)
  • External transmissions: mandatory TLS 1.2+ or VPN tunnels; unencrypted email containing ePHI is blocked by DLP gateway
  • HL7 FHIR API endpoints: mutual TLS with SMART on FHIR authorization
  • Direct secure messaging for provider-to-provider ePHI exchange (Direct Protocol with S/MIME encryption)
  • Integrity controls: TLS provides built-in integrity via HMAC; additional checksums on batch file transfers (HL7 batch, X12 EDI)
  • Wireless networks: WPA3 Enterprise with 802.1X RADIUS authentication on all clinical wireless networks; separate guest network with no ePHI system access

Administrative Safeguards — §164.308 (Selected Key Requirements)

Security Management Process — §164.308(a)(1)

Implementation SpecificationType
Risk AnalysisRequired
Risk ManagementRequired
Sanction PolicyRequired
Information System Activity ReviewRequired

Workforce Security — §164.308(a)(3)

Implementation SpecificationType
Authorization and/or SupervisionAddressable
Workforce Clearance ProcedureAddressable
Termination ProceduresAddressable

Information Access Management — §164.308(a)(4)

Implementation SpecificationType
Isolating Healthcare Clearinghouse FunctionsRequired
Access AuthorizationAddressable
Access Establishment and ModificationAddressable

Security Awareness and Training — §164.308(a)(5)

Implementation SpecificationType
Security RemindersAddressable
Protection from Malicious SoftwareAddressable
Log-in MonitoringAddressable
Password ManagementAddressable

Security Incident Procedures — §164.308(a)(6)

Implementation SpecificationType
Response and ReportingRequired

Contingency Plan — §164.308(a)(7)

Implementation SpecificationType
Data Backup PlanRequired
Disaster Recovery PlanRequired
Emergency Mode Operation PlanRequired
Testing and Revision ProceduresAddressable
Applications and Data Criticality AnalysisAddressable

Physical Safeguards — §164.310 (Summary)

Facility Access Controls — §164.310(a)(1)

Addressable specifications: Contingency operations, facility security plan, access control and validation procedures, maintenance records.

Workstation Use — §164.310(b)

Required standard specifying appropriate physical environment and manner of use for workstations accessing ePHI.

Workstation Security — §164.310(c)

Required standard implementing physical safeguards restricting access to workstations that access ePHI.

Device and Media Controls — §164.310(d)(1)

Required specifications for disposal and media re-use; addressable specifications for accountability and data backup/storage.

Required vs Addressable: OCR Expectations

OCR has clarified that "addressable" does not mean "optional." For each addressable specification, covered entities must:

  1. Assess whether the implementation specification is a reasonable and appropriate safeguard in their environment
  2. If yes, implement it
  3. If not, document why it is not reasonable and appropriate AND implement an equivalent alternative measure that is reasonable and appropriate OR document why the standard can still be met without the specification or alternative

OCR enforcement actions have found violations where entities failed to encrypt ePHI (addressable) without documenting any alternative measure. In practice, encryption of ePHI at rest and in transit is expected by OCR absent extraordinary documented justification.

Enforcement Precedents

  • Anthem Inc. (2018): $16 million — failure to implement technical safeguards including access controls sufficient to prevent unauthorized access to ePHI of 78.8 million individuals
  • Premera Blue Cross (2020): $6.85 million — failure to implement security measures sufficient to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI; inadequate audit controls
  • CHSPSC LLC (2020): $2.3 million — failure to implement information system activity review, inadequate response to known security incident (APT attack affecting 6.1 million individuals)
  • Excellus Health Plan (2021): $5.1 million — inadequate access controls, failure to conduct enterprise-wide risk analysis, insufficient technical policies
  • Banner Health (2023): $1.25 million — failure to implement audit controls and conduct accurate technical risk analysis after breach of 2.81 million records

Integration Points

  • hipaa-privacy-rule: Privacy Rule establishes what must be protected; Security Rule establishes how
  • hipaa-risk-analysis: Detailed risk analysis methodology mandated by §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)
  • hipaa-breach-notify: Security incidents that result in unauthorized access trigger breach notification
  • hipaa-baa-management: Business associates must independently comply with all Security Rule standards

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する