本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

indirect-collection-notice

Provides GDPR Article 14 information for personal data obtained from sources other than the data subject, covering timing requirements (within reasonable period, max one month), source disclosure, all required elements, and exemptions under Art. 14(5). Activate for Art. 14, indirect collection, third-party data source, indirect data notice queries.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • assets/template.md3.1 KB
  • references/standards.md1.8 KB
  • references/workflows.md2.9 KB
  • scripts/process.py9.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Providing Indirect Collection Information

Overview

GDPR Article 14 applies when a controller obtains personal data from a source other than the data subject — such as from third-party data brokers, publicly available sources, other controllers, or through automated observation by third parties. The controller must still provide the data subject with comprehensive information about the processing, but the timing and content requirements differ from Art. 13.

Legal Foundation

GDPR Article 14 — Information Where Personal Data Have Not Been Obtained from the Data Subject

Required Information (Art. 14(1)-(2))

All elements required under Art. 13(1)(a)-(f) and Art. 13(2)(a)-(g) PLUS:

ElementArticleDescription
Categories of personal dataArt. 14(1)(d)The categories of personal data concerned (not required under Art. 13 because the subject already knows what they provided)
Source of dataArt. 14(2)(f)From which source the personal data originate, and if applicable, whether it came from publicly accessible sources

Timing Requirements (Art. 14(3))

The controller must provide the information:

  1. Art. 14(3)(a) — Default: Within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but at the latest within one month, having regard to the specific circumstances in which the personal data are processed.
  2. Art. 14(3)(b) — Communication with data subject: If the personal data are to be used for communication with the data subject, at the latest at the time of the first communication to that data subject.
  3. Art. 14(3)(c) — Disclosure to another recipient: If a disclosure to another recipient is envisaged, at the latest when the personal data are first disclosed.

The earliest applicable deadline governs.

Exemptions Under Art. 14(5)

Art. 14(1)-(4) shall not apply where and insofar as:

  1. Art. 14(5)(a) — Data subject already has the information: The data subject already has the information.
  2. Art. 14(5)(b) — Impossible or disproportionate effort: The provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, in particular for processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research, or statistical purposes under Art. 89(1). In such cases, the controller must take appropriate measures to protect the data subject's rights and freedoms, including making the information publicly available.
  3. Art. 14(5)(c) — Union or Member State law: Obtaining or disclosure is expressly laid down by Union or Member State law which provides appropriate measures to protect the data subject's legitimate interests.
  4. Art. 14(5)(d) — Professional secrecy: The personal data must remain confidential subject to an obligation of professional secrecy regulated by Union or Member State law, including a statutory obligation of secrecy.

Common Indirect Collection Scenarios at Meridian Analytics Ltd

ScenarioData SourceCategoriesTiming Obligation
Client employee data received from employer clientEmployer (another controller)Name, email, job title, access permissionsWithin 1 month of receipt, or at first communication
Companies House / public registry dataPublicly accessible sourceDirector names, registered address, filing historyWithin 1 month; note public source in notice
Credit reference agency dataCredit reference agency (Experian, Equifax)Credit score, payment history, financial indicatorsAt first communication or within 1 month
Referral from existing clientExisting clientName, email, companyAt first communication with referred person
Data enrichment from third-party providerData enrichment providerFirmographic data, industry classificationWithin 1 month of enrichment

Indirect Collection Information Workflow

Step 1: Identify Indirect Data Acquisition

  1. Map all sources of personal data that are not the data subjects themselves.
  2. For each source, document:
    • Source identity and type (controller, publicly accessible, data broker)
    • Categories of personal data received
    • Legal basis for receiving the data
    • Date of receipt
    • Purpose of processing

Step 2: Determine the Timing Obligation

Apply the earliest applicable deadline from Art. 14(3)(a)-(c):

[Data Received from Third Party]
         │
         ▼
[Will data be used to contact the subject?]
   ├── Yes ──► Notify at or before first communication
   └── No ──► [Will data be disclosed to another recipient?]
               ├── Yes ──► Notify before or at disclosure
               └── No ──► Notify within reasonable period (max 1 month)

Step 3: Prepare the Art. 14 Notice

The notice must contain all elements specified in Art. 14(1) and (2). Use the following structure:

  1. Controller identity: Meridian Analytics Ltd, 47 Canary Wharf Tower, London E14 5AB
  2. DPO contact: Dr Sarah Chen, dpo@meridiananalytics.co.uk
  3. Purposes and legal basis: State each purpose and its legal basis
  4. Categories of personal data: List the categories obtained (since the subject did not provide them directly)
  5. Recipients: Identify recipients or categories
  6. International transfers: Describe any transfers and safeguards
  7. Retention period: State period or criteria
  8. Data subject rights: List all applicable rights
  9. Right to withdraw consent: If applicable
  10. Right to complain: ICO details
  11. Source of data: Identify the source and whether it is publicly accessible
  12. Automated decision-making: If applicable
  13. Further processing: If applicable

Step 4: Assess Exemptions

Before deciding not to provide Art. 14 information, assess each exemption strictly:

ExemptionAssessmentDocumentation Required
Art. 14(5)(a) — Already has infoVerify the subject has received materially equivalent information from another sourceRecord the source and date of prior information
Art. 14(5)(b) — Impossible/disproportionate effortConduct and document proportionality assessment considering: number of data subjects, age of data, compensatory measures availableWritten proportionality assessment, approved by DPO, with compensatory measures (e.g., publish information on website)
Art. 14(5)(c) — Law requires acquisitionIdentify the specific legal provisionCitation of the provision
Art. 14(5)(d) — Professional secrecyIdentify the statutory obligation of secrecyCitation of the provision

The EDPB Guidelines on Transparency (WP260 rev.01) state that the Art. 14(5)(b) exemption should be interpreted restrictively and that the mere inconvenience or cost of providing information is not sufficient to constitute "disproportionate effort."

Step 5: Deliver the Notice

  1. Email: If the subject's email address is available, send the Art. 14 notice by email.
  2. Postal mail: If only a postal address is available, send by first-class post.
  3. Combined with first communication: Where the first communication is an email or letter, include the Art. 14 information in or with that communication.
  4. Published notice: Where the Art. 14(5)(b) exemption applies and compensatory measures are required, publish the information on the controller's website.

Step 6: Document and Record

  1. Record the date of each Art. 14 notification.
  2. Record the method of delivery.
  3. Record any exemption relied upon and its justification.
  4. Retain the record for 3 years.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する