本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

multi-state-compliance

Multi-state harmonized privacy compliance program. Common requirements matrix across all US state privacy laws, state-specific deltas, unified privacy program architecture, and implementation strategy for operating across California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Texas, Oregon, Montana, and Kentucky.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • assets/template.md1.8 KB
  • references/standards.md2.2 KB
  • references/workflows.md3.8 KB
  • scripts/process.py11.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Multi-State Harmonized Compliance Program

Overview

As of 2026, over 20 US states have enacted comprehensive consumer privacy legislation. Organizations operating nationwide face a complex patchwork of requirements with significant overlap but important state-specific variations. A harmonized multi-state compliance program identifies the common baseline, maps state-specific deltas, and implements a unified privacy architecture that satisfies all applicable laws.

This skill covers the eight major enacted and effective state privacy laws: CCPA/CPRA (California), VCDPA (Virginia), CPA (Colorado), CTDPA (Connecticut), TDPSA (Texas), OCPA (Oregon), MTDPA (Montana), and KPPA (Kentucky).

Common Requirements Matrix

Consumer Rights — Universal Baseline

All eight laws provide these core rights:

RightCAVACOCTTXORMTKY
Access/KnowYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
CorrectYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
DeleteYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
PortabilityYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Opt-out: targeted adsYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Opt-out: saleYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Opt-out: profilingNo*YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Limit sensitive PIYesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Third-party listNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNo
AppealNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYes

*California provides opt-out of automated decision-making under pending CPPA regulations.

Controller Obligations — Universal Baseline

ObligationAll States
Privacy notice/policyRequired
Data minimizationRequired
Purpose limitationRequired
Data securityRequired
Non-discriminationRequired
Response timeline45 days (all states)

State-Specific Deltas

California (CCPA/CPRA) — Unique Requirements

  • Revenue threshold: $25M alternative threshold (no other state has this)
  • Sensitive PI limit right: Post-collection limit mechanism (other states require pre-collection consent)
  • CPPA enforcement: Dedicated privacy agency (only state with one)
  • Private right of action: For data breach claims (only state with any private right of action)
  • Annual metrics: Required for businesses processing 10M+ consumers
  • Data processing agreements: Explicit statutory requirement
  • No cure period: Eliminated by CPRA

Virginia (VCDPA) — Unique Requirements

  • 50% revenue threshold: Higher revenue percentage requirement than most states

Colorado (CPA) — Unique Requirements

  • AG rulemaking: Most detailed implementing regulations (4 CCR 904-3)
  • Universal opt-out: First mandated (effective July 2024)
  • Profiling opt-out scope: Broadest definition covering 7+ decision categories
  • $20,000 penalties: Higher per-violation penalties under Consumer Protection Act

Connecticut (CTDPA) — Unique Requirements

  • Dark pattern prohibition: Explicit statutory definition and prohibition
  • Loyalty program exemption: Bona fide loyalty programs exempt from sale opt-out
  • 25% revenue threshold: Lower than Virginia's 50%

Texas (TDPSA) — Unique Requirements

  • No revenue/consumer threshold: Applies to all non-SBA-small businesses
  • Data broker registration: Secretary of State registration requirement
  • CUBI interaction: Separate biometric data law (up to $25,000/violation)
  • Broadest applicability: Largest state population, lowest effective threshold

Oregon (OCPA) — Unique Requirements

  • Nonprofit coverage: Applies to nonprofit organizations
  • Third-party list right: Specific entity names, not just categories
  • De-identified data: Most detailed compliance requirements
  • Employee data partial exemption: Unique treatment of employee data
  • Transgender/nonbinary status: Explicit sensitive data category
  • 14-day cure period: Shortest cure period among states

Montana (MTDPA) — Unique Requirements

  • 50,000 consumer threshold: Lowest consumer count threshold
  • 15-day extension only: Shorter extension than most states' 45 days
  • Air carrier exemption: Unique industry exemption

Kentucky (KPPA) — Unique Requirements

  • January 2026 effective date: Most recently effective among this group
  • 50% revenue threshold: Matches Virginia

Unified Privacy Program Architecture

Tier 1: Common Baseline (Apply Everywhere)

These requirements are common across all states and form the foundation:

  1. Privacy notice with categories of PI, purposes, rights, third parties, contact info
  2. Consumer rights portal supporting access, correct, delete, portability, opt-out
  3. 45-day response SLA with tracking and metrics
  4. Data minimization and purpose limitation controls
  5. Reasonable data security measures
  6. Non-discrimination protections

Tier 2: High-Water Mark (Apply to Satisfy Strictest Requirement)

Where state requirements differ, apply the strictest standard universally:

AreaStrictest StandardSource State
Sensitive data consentOpt-in consent before collectionVA, CO, CT, TX, OR, MT, KY
Dark pattern prohibitionConsent via dark patterns invalidCT (explicit), all (implicit)
Response extension15-day extension onlyMT (strictest) or accept state-by-state
Universal opt-outHonor GPC signalsCA, CO, CT, MT
Profiling opt-outInclude 7+ decision categoriesCO (broadest scope)
De-identified dataFull compliance programOR (most detailed)
Privacy notice retention periodsInclude per-category retentionCA (CPRA requirement)

Tier 3: State-Specific (Apply Only Where Required)

RequirementState(s)Implementation
"Do Not Sell or Share" linkCAHomepage footer
"Limit Sensitive PI" linkCAAdjacent to opt-out link
Specific third-party listORAdditional disclosure in Oregon responses
Data broker registrationTXSecretary of State registration (if applicable)
Annual metrics disclosureCA (10M+)Privacy notice metrics section
Loyalty program exemptionCTProgram-specific terms
Nonprofit complianceORFull program for Oregon nonprofit operations

Implementation Strategy for Liberty Commerce Inc.

Approach: High-Water Mark with State-Specific Overlays

Liberty Commerce Inc. implements a unified privacy program at the highest common standard, with state-specific modules activated based on the consumer's state of residence.

Consumer Request Received
  │
  ├─► Determine Consumer's State
  │
  ├─► Apply Tier 1 Common Baseline
  │     (Same for all states)
  │
  ├─► Apply Tier 2 High-Water Mark
  │     (Strictest standard, applied universally)
  │
  └─► Apply Tier 3 State-Specific Module
        ├─ California module: CPRA-specific disclosures, sensitive PI limit
        ├─ Oregon module: Third-party specific list
        ├─ Texas module: Data broker check
        └─ Connecticut module: Loyalty program exemption assessment

Harmonized Privacy Notice Template

A multi-state privacy notice should include these sections to satisfy all eight laws:

  1. Categories of PI/personal data collected (all states)
  2. Categories of sensitive PI/sensitive data collected (all states)
  3. Purposes for each category (all states)
  4. Retention period or criteria per category (CA required; best practice all)
  5. Sources of PI (CA required; best practice all)
  6. Categories of third parties receiving PI (all states)
  7. Whether PI is sold or shared (all states)
  8. Whether targeted advertising is conducted (all non-CA states)
  9. Whether profiling is conducted (all non-CA states)
  10. Consumer rights and how to exercise (all states)
  11. Appeal process (VA, CO, CT, TX, OR, MT, KY)
  12. Contact information (all states)
  13. "Do Not Sell or Share" link (CA)
  14. "Limit Sensitive PI" link (CA)
  15. Universal opt-out disclosure (CA, CO, CT, MT)
  16. Last updated date (CA required; best practice all)
  17. Annual metrics (CA, if 10M+ consumers)

Key Regulatory References

  • IAPP US State Comprehensive Privacy Law Comparison Chart (updated quarterly)
  • CPPA Regulations 11 CCR §7001-7102
  • Colorado AG Regulations 4 CCR 904-3
  • Global Privacy Control Specification v1.0

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する