本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

oregon-ocpa-compliance

Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA) compliance. Unique provisions for de-identified data requirements, employee data partial exemption, nonprofit applicability, 14-day cure period, and consumer rights. Effective July 1, 2024. AG enforcement only.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md8.1 KB
  • assets/template.md1.5 KB
  • references/standards.md3.0 KB
  • references/workflows.md4.1 KB
  • scripts/process.py9.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA)

Overview

The Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA), codified as ORS §646A.570 through §646A.604, was signed into law on July 18, 2023 (SB 619), and became effective July 1, 2024. Oregon is notable for several unique provisions: it applies to nonprofit organizations (unlike most state privacy laws), has specific de-identified data compliance requirements, includes a partial exemption for employee data, and provides a 14-day cure period (the shortest of any state law with a cure period).

Applicability (§646A.572)

The OCPA applies to a person that conducts business in Oregon or provides products or services to Oregon residents AND during a calendar year:

  1. Controls or processes personal data of 100,000 or more Oregon consumers (excluding data processed solely for payment transactions); OR
  2. Controls or processes personal data of 25,000 or more Oregon consumers AND derives 25% or more of annual gross revenue from selling personal data.

Key unique features:

  • Nonprofit applicability: Unlike Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Texas, the OCPA applies to nonprofit organizations
  • No revenue threshold alternative: Like Virginia and Colorado, there is no standalone revenue threshold

Exemptions (§646A.572(2)):

  • State and local government bodies
  • GLBA-covered financial institutions (entity-level)
  • HIPAA covered entities and business associates (entity-level)
  • Data governed by GLBA, HIPAA, FERPA, FCRA, DPPA, COPPA, Farm Credit Act
  • Not exempt: Nonprofit organizations (unique among state privacy laws)

Liberty Commerce Inc. Assessment: Liberty Commerce Inc. processes personal data of approximately 72,000 Oregon consumers and derives 12% of revenue from data sale activities. It does not meet either threshold. However, Liberty Commerce Inc. implements OCPA compliance as part of its multi-state program for operational consistency.

Consumer Rights (§646A.578)

Six Consumer Rights

  1. Right to Access (§646A.578(1)(a)): Confirm processing and access personal data
  2. Right to Correct (§646A.578(1)(b)): Correct inaccuracies
  3. Right to Delete (§646A.578(1)(c)): Delete personal data
  4. Right to Portability (§646A.578(1)(d)): Obtain data in portable format
  5. Right to Opt Out (§646A.578(1)(e)):
    • Targeted advertising
    • Sale of personal data
    • Profiling in furtherance of decisions producing legal or similarly significant effects
  6. Right to Know Third Parties (§646A.578(1)(f)): Obtain a list of specific third parties to whom the controller has disclosed the consumer's personal data

Note: The Right to Know Third Parties is unique to Oregon — most other state laws only require disclosure of categories of third parties, not specific names.

Response Requirements (§646A.580)

  • Respond within 45 days
  • Extension: up to 45 additional days with notice
  • Appeal: controller must respond within 45 days (not 60 like other states)

De-Identified Data Requirements (§646A.574)

Oregon has the most detailed de-identified data requirements of any state privacy law:

Controller Obligations for De-Identified Data

  1. Take reasonable measures to ensure data cannot be associated with a natural person
  2. Publicly commit to maintain and use data only in de-identified form
  3. Contractually obligate recipients to comply with de-identification requirements
  4. Exercise reasonable oversight to monitor compliance with contractual obligations
  5. Take appropriate steps to address any breach of the contractual obligations

Technical Standards

  • Must use technical safeguards to prevent re-identification
  • Must implement organizational safeguards including access controls
  • Must conduct regular assessments of re-identification risk
  • Must delete or destroy data if de-identification can no longer be maintained

Liberty Commerce Inc. Implementation: Liberty Commerce Inc. applies k-anonymity (k=5 minimum) and differential privacy techniques to de-identified datasets. A public commitment statement is posted at privacy.libertycommerce.com/deidentification. All recipients of de-identified data sign agreements prohibiting re-identification attempts. Quarterly re-identification risk assessments are conducted by the data science team.

Employee Data Partial Exemption (§646A.572(4))

Exemption Scope

The OCPA provides a partial exemption for employee data. Personal data processed in the context of employment is exempt from:

  • Consumer rights provisions (§646A.578) — access, correct, delete, portability, opt-out
  • Consumer request processing requirements (§646A.580)

Not Exempt

Employee data is NOT exempt from:

  • Controller obligations (§646A.576) — privacy notice, data minimization, security
  • Processor requirements (§646A.582)
  • De-identified data requirements (§646A.574)
  • Data protection assessment requirements (§646A.584)
  • Sensitive data consent requirements (§646A.576(8))

Liberty Commerce Inc. Implementation: Liberty Commerce Inc. provides a privacy notice to Oregon employees covering all data processing activities. Sensitive employee data (health information for benefits, racial/ethnic data for diversity reporting) is processed only with consent. DPIAs are conducted for employee profiling activities (performance scoring, promotion algorithms).

Nonprofit Applicability

Oregon is unique in applying its privacy law to nonprofit organizations. This has significant implications:

Organization TypeOCPAVCDPACPACTDPATDPSACCPA/CPRA
For-profitYesYesYesYesYesYes
NonprofitYesNoNoNoNoNo

Implications for nonprofits:

  • Must assess applicability against 100,000/25,000 consumer thresholds
  • Must provide consumer rights if applicable
  • Must comply with controller obligations (privacy notice, minimization, security)
  • Must obtain consent for sensitive data processing
  • Must conduct DPIAs for targeted advertising, sale, profiling, and sensitive data

Sensitive Data (§646A.574(14))

Categories

  1. Racial or ethnic origin
  2. Religious beliefs
  3. Mental or physical health diagnosis
  4. Sexual orientation
  5. Citizenship or immigration status
  6. Genetic or biometric data for identification
  7. Personal data of a known child
  8. Precise geolocation data
  9. Transgender or nonbinary status (unique to Oregon)

Note: Oregon is the first state to explicitly include transgender or nonbinary status as a sensitive data category.

Consent Requirement

Processing requires opt-in consent. Consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous.

14-Day Cure Period (§646A.600)

Oregon provides a 14-day cure period — the shortest among state privacy laws with cure provisions:

StateCure PeriodDuration
Oregon14 daysPermanent
Virginia30 daysPermanent
Texas30 daysPermanent
Colorado60 daysExpired January 1, 2025
Connecticut60 daysExpired January 1, 2025
CaliforniaNoneEliminated by CPRA

Cure Process

  1. AG provides written notice of alleged violation
  2. Controller has 14 days to cure
  3. If cured and written statement provided: AG may not bring action
  4. If not cured: AG may proceed under Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (ORS §646.607)

Key Regulatory References

  • ORS §646A.570 through §646A.604 (OCPA)
  • ORS §646.607 et seq. (Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act — enforcement)
  • NIST Special Publication 800-188 — De-Identification of Personal Information (reference standard)
  • Oregon AG Consumer Privacy Division guidance (as published)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する