本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

right-to-rectification

Processes GDPR Article 16 right to rectification requests, covering verification of corrected data accuracy, notification to recipients under Article 19, timeline management, and completion of incomplete data. Activate for rectification, correction request, inaccurate data, Art. 16, data correction queries.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • assets/template.md2.0 KB
  • references/standards.md1.7 KB
  • references/workflows.md3.0 KB
  • scripts/process.py8.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Processing Right to Rectification

Overview

The right to rectification under GDPR Article 16 gives data subjects the right to have inaccurate personal data corrected without undue delay, and to have incomplete personal data completed. This skill provides the complete workflow for receiving, verifying, implementing, and confirming rectification requests.

Legal Foundation

GDPR Article 16 — Right to Rectification

The data subject has the right to obtain from the controller without undue delay the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning them. Taking into account the purposes of the processing, the data subject has the right to have incomplete personal data completed, including by means of providing a supplementary statement.

GDPR Article 19 — Notification Obligation

The controller shall communicate any rectification to each recipient to whom the personal data have been disclosed, unless this proves impossible or involves disproportionate effort. The controller shall inform the data subject about those recipients if the data subject requests it.

GDPR Article 5(1)(d) — Accuracy Principle

Personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date. Every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that personal data that are inaccurate, having regard to the purposes for which they are processed, are erased or rectified without delay.

Rectification Processing Workflow

Step 1: Receive and Log the Request

  1. Log the request with reference REC-YYYY-NNNN.
  2. Record the specific data the subject claims is inaccurate or incomplete.
  3. Record what the subject asserts the correct or complete data should be.
  4. Record any supporting evidence provided.
  5. Send acknowledgement within 3 business days.
  6. Verify identity using tiered verification.

Step 2: Identify Affected Data

  1. Locate the specific data items cited as inaccurate across all systems:
    • CRM and customer database
    • Marketing platforms
    • Analytics systems
    • Third-party processors
    • Backup systems
  2. Document the current value of each data item.
  3. Document the correction requested for each item.

Step 3: Verify the Correction

Two types of rectification require different verification:

Type A: Correction of Inaccurate Data

Data CategoryVerification MethodExample
Name / spellingAccept subject's assertion unless reason to doubtSubject states name is "MacLeod" not "McLeod" — accept
Date of birthRequest documentary evidence (passport, birth certificate)Subject provides passport scan showing correct DOB
AddressAccept subject's assertion for current address; verify historical addresses against postal records if relevantSubject provides utility bill as confirmation
Employment detailsAccept subject's assertion or verify with employer (with subject's consent)Subject states correct job title
Financial dataVerify against source records (bank statements, invoices)Cross-reference with payment processor records
Technical data (IP, device)Assess whether correction is factually possible — these are system-generated observationsIf system logs show IP X, correction may not be appropriate unless a logging error occurred

Type B: Completion of Incomplete Data

  1. Assess whether the additional data is relevant to the purposes of processing.
  2. If relevant, add the supplementary data.
  3. If not relevant (i.e., the additional data is not necessary for any processing purpose), the controller may decline to add it but should inform the subject of the reason.

Step 4: Decision

ScenarioAction
Verification confirms inaccuracyRectify the data across all systems
Verification is inconclusiveApply restriction under Art. 18(1)(a) while investigation continues
Verification confirms data is accurateInform the subject that the data has been verified as accurate; note the subject's objection; offer the right to add a supplementary statement
Completion request is relevantAdd the supplementary data
Completion request is not relevant to processing purposesDecline with explanation

Step 5: Implement the Rectification

  1. Update the data across all primary systems simultaneously (or as close to simultaneously as technically feasible).
  2. Update any derived data or reports that incorporate the inaccurate data.
  3. Flag data in backup systems for correction at next rotation.
  4. Document:
    • Original value
    • Corrected value
    • Date of rectification
    • Systems updated
    • Person who implemented the change

Step 6: Notify Recipients Under Art. 19

  1. Identify all recipients who received the inaccurate data (reference Art. 30 records).
  2. Send rectification notification to each recipient:
    • The specific data that has been corrected (without disclosing the subject's identity where possible)
    • The corrected value
    • Instruction to update their records accordingly
    • 14-day confirmation deadline
  3. Log all notifications and confirmations.

Step 7: Confirm to the Data Subject

Within the 30-day response deadline, send confirmation including:

  • The specific data items that have been rectified
  • The corrected values now held
  • Confirmation that all systems have been updated
  • Expected completion date for backup system corrections (if applicable)
  • List of third-party recipients notified (if requested by the subject)
  • If any part of the rectification was declined, the reasons and the subject's right to complain

Response Timeline

  • Standard deadline: 30 calendar days from receipt of the request.
  • Extension: Up to 60 additional days for complex cases (Art. 12(3)).
  • Implementation target: Rectification should be applied to primary systems within 5 business days of the verification decision, even if the formal response is still being prepared.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する