本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

state-law-tracker

Tracks and monitors US state privacy legislation across all 50 states, DC, and territories. Covers enacted comprehensive privacy laws (California CCPA/CPRA, Virginia VCDPA, Colorado CPA, Connecticut CTDPA, Utah UCPA, and subsequent enactments), pending bills, effective dates, and key requirement differences. Keywords: state privacy law, CCPA, CPRA, VCDPA, CPA, CTDPA, UCPA, multi-state.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills
インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル（5）

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • assets/template.md4.0 KB
  • references/standards.md3.8 KB
  • references/workflows.md6.3 KB
  • scripts/process.py15.7 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

US State Privacy Law Tracker

Overview

The United States does not have a single comprehensive federal privacy law. Instead, a patchwork of state-level comprehensive privacy statutes has emerged since the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) was enacted in 2018. As of early 2026, twenty states have enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws, with additional states introducing legislation in each legislative session. This skill tracks the status of enacted laws, key provisions, effective dates, and substantive differences that drive multi-state compliance obligations.

Enacted Comprehensive State Privacy Laws

StateLawEnactedEffectiveEnforcer
CaliforniaCCPA/CPRA2018/20201 Jan 2020 / 1 Jan 2023CPPA + AG
VirginiaVCDPA20211 Jan 2023AG
ColoradoCPA20211 Jul 2023AG
ConnecticutCTDPA20221 Jul 2023AG
UtahUCPA202231 Dec 2023AG
IowaICDPA20231 Jan 2025AG
IndianaINCDPA20231 Jan 2026AG
TennesseeTIPA20231 Jul 2025AG
MontanaMCDPA20231 Oct 2024AG
TexasTDPSA20231 Jul 2024AG
OregonOCPA20231 Jul 2024AG
DelawareDPDPA20231 Jan 2025AG
New HampshireNHPA20241 Jan 2025AG
New JerseyNJDPA202415 Jan 2025AG
NebraskaNDPA20241 Jan 2025AG
MinnesotaMCDPA202431 Jul 2025AG
MarylandMODPA20241 Oct 2025AG
Rhode IslandRIDPA20241 Jan 2026AG
KentuckyKCDPA20241 Jan 2026AG
VermontVDPA20241 Jul 2025AG

Key Compliance Variables Across States

Applicability Thresholds

States differ in what triggers applicability:

  • Revenue threshold: California (USD 25 million gross revenue) is the only state with a revenue trigger
  • Consumer volume: Most states use 100,000 consumers; Texas uses 50,000 (if revenue derived from data sales); Montana uses 50,000 (total population consideration)
  • Revenue from data sales: Most states apply if 25% or more of revenue comes from selling personal data (for businesses processing 25,000+ consumers)

Consumer Rights Comparison

RightCAVACOCTTXORNJMD
AccessYYYYYYYY
DeleteYYYYYYYY
CorrectYYYYYYYY
PortabilityYYYYYYYY
Opt-out of saleYYYYYYYY
Opt-out of targeted adsYYYYYYYY
Opt-out of profilingN*YYYYYYY
Appeal rightNYYYYYYY
Private right of actionY**NNNNNNN

*California CPRA provides limited automated decision-making rights via regulations **California PRA limited to data breaches involving specified personal information

Cure Period Variations

  • 30-day cure: Virginia, Utah, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Kentucky
  • 60-day cure: Colorado (expires 1 Jan 2025), Connecticut (expires 31 Dec 2024)
  • No cure period: California (CPPA discretion), Texas, Oregon, New Jersey, Maryland
  • AG discretion: Several states allow AG to determine cure appropriateness

Universal Opt-Out Mechanism

States increasingly recognise universal opt-out signals:

  • Required: California (CPRA regulations), Colorado, Connecticut, Texas, Montana, Oregon, Delaware, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Minnesota, Maryland, Vermont
  • Not required: Virginia, Utah, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Kentucky

Monitoring Methodology

This tracker is updated by reviewing:

  1. National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) privacy legislation database
  2. International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) state law comparison tool
  3. Individual state legislature bill tracking systems
  4. Attorney General enforcement announcements

Integration Points

  • state-law-applicability: Uses tracker data to determine which state laws apply to a specific organisation
  • multi-state-compliance: Operationalises tracker data into a unified compliance programme
  • universal-opt-out: Implements technical mechanisms required by states mandating GPC/universal opt-out
  • ccpa-consumer-requests: California-specific consumer request handling
  • vcdpa-compliance: Virginia-specific compliance operations
  • texas-tdpsa-compliance: Texas-specific compliance operations

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

ログインしてレビューを書く

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

42-cfr-part-2

無料

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

adequacy-assessment

無料

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

age-gating-services

無料

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

age-verification-methods

無料

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

ai-act-high-risk-docs

無料

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

ai-automated-decisions

無料

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する