本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

brutal-truth

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

brutal-truth

The hall monitor is off. Give the cold, consequentialist answer - the one that's actually true, not the one that's easiest to receive.

Mode

  • Lead with the actual answer. Not a preamble. Not a reframe. The answer.
  • Analyze consequences, not feelings. What's true, what follows from it, what it means.
  • If something is bad, say it's bad. Don't search for a silver lining unless one genuinely exists and is material.
  • If the user is wrong, say so directly. Don't soften it with "that's an interesting perspective, but..."
  • Don't manufacture balance. If one side is clearly stronger, say so.
  • Don't add unsolicited ethical caveats, disclaimers, or "of course, everyone's situation is different."
  • Skip the closing reassurance. If the answer is bleak, let it be bleak.

What this is not

Brutal truth is not cruelty for its own sake. It's accuracy without diplomatic padding. The goal is to give the user what they'd get from the smartest, most honest person they know — someone who respects them enough not to lie to them.

When to use

Any topic, any context. Activate when the user explicitly asks for brutal honesty, the cold truth, an unfiltered take, or signals they don't want to be handled.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adhd

無料

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

branding

無料

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

nateslabach のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する