本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

maintain-verification-skill

Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskellスター 348(GitHub 348 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml43 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Maintain a verification skill

A feature map drifts as the framework, language and toolchain change. This skill is the upkeep loop for a skill generated by /create-verification-skill (or any project-local verification skill with a feature map). The unit of rigor is the feature, not every sentence: cover every feature file from source and exercise every feature through its actual compiler, library, CLI or runtime entrypoint, without turning every bullet into a separate proof obligation.

When a mapped feature uses shared test, regression, consumer or benchmark tooling, follow that owning skill's entrypoint and keep one copy of the helper. Use Validate skills after changing metadata, resource paths or cross-skill links.

Outcomes

Pick one, and say which:

  • clean — every feature got source and live coverage; nothing worth shipping. No branch, no PR.
  • changed — one PR ships proven doc, harness, or map corrections.
  • blocked — coverage could not finish or a proven fix could not ship safely. Say exactly what blocked it.

Edit scope

Only edit the verification skill's own directory (its SKILL.md, features/, and any harness scripts it owns). Never edit framework or toolchain implementation during a run: a behavior the map describes that the target no longer provides is either doc drift (fix the map) or a product regression (report it, don't paper over it in docs).

Pass

  1. Locate the target. Find the verification skill to maintain: the project-local skill whose body has launch/drive sections and a feature map (usually .agents/skills/verify-*/). Several candidates → ask which one; none → stop and point at /create-verification-skill instead of inventing a target.

  2. Index hygiene. Read the feature map README and glob its sibling files. Fix missing, extra, duplicate, or dead entries. Lightweight; no generated inventory.

  3. Source wave. One read-only delegated source reviewer per feature file, following AGENTS.md. Launch concurrently where capacity permits; otherwise batch without dropping any feature or its summary. Each explains "how does this caller-visible framework or language contract work?" from source, flags likely doc drift with citations, and returns one concise live-verification recipe. Children never execute verification drives and never edit files. Return shape: feature summary / source entry points / likely drift or none / one recipe.

  4. Reconcile. Every feature file has a returned summary. Merge overlapping recipes into as few compatible fixture/runtime states as practical. Spot-check cited drift; don't re-prove clean claims. Sweep recent churn for caller-visible framework, language or toolchain surfaces missing from the map — require a concrete source path before calling one missing.

  5. Live pass. Required even when source looks clean. The coordinator owns all driving; follow the verification skill's Launch procedure — actual consumer/compiler fixture work for compile-time claims, demanded or executed library/decision/Task behavior for runtime claims, one long-lived instance driven serially for servers, or a fresh isolated session per drive for short-lived CLIs. The target skill decides the procedure. For an indirect-interaction feature, observe every specified downstream outcome; originating acceptance, query readiness or one projection cannot substitute for another required result. Exercise every feature at least once, and hold three invariants the whole pass, whatever the failure: (1) never drive a target whose prerequisites you haven't checked since it last did something surprising — doctor before first drive, doctor on each fresh session where sessions are the unit, doctor again after any failed drive, and where doctor can't see the failure (stalled fixture or projection state behind an otherwise healthy process), reset to a known state or relaunch rather than hoping; (2) evidence captured so far survives every cleanup, checked at its named location, not assumed; (3) nothing a drive started outlives that drive's usefulness — failed-iteration residue is cleaned whether the session is stuck, exited, or shared (for a shared instance, clean the residue, not the instance). A doctor failure caused by skill drift is drift: fix it under edit scope and retry once — restart whatever the fix invalidated, nothing more — before calling the pass blocked. A feature that can't be reached is verified-unreachable only with the concrete prerequisite (auth, entitlement, OS, external state) and the route attempted; if the map omits that prerequisite, that's drift. Any harness fix from triage gets re-driven live before it ships. Final teardown happens after the last drive of the run — including those re-proofs — so nothing outlives the run (evidence stays, per the skill).

  6. Triage. Wrong or missing developer/caller-POV description → doc drift, fix it. Working behavior the harness can't drive → harness gap, fix it; a harness fix follows the same helpers rule as generation (scripts executable, invocation documented in the skill body). Framework or toolchain behavior that's actually broken → product gap; record it for the user, keep it out of this PR.

  7. Ship or stop. For changed: one PR of proven corrections, re-read every changed file first. For clean or blocked: no PR, report the outcome and the coverage honestly.

Keep concise run notes (features covered, unreachable prerequisites, confirmed drift, outcome) under .agents-state; don't commit them. Retain proof artifacts separately from scratch state, following the target verification skill.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

architect

無料

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

arena

無料

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

babysit

無料

Inspect or supervise a PR or stack through review and CI to merge-ready, using current GitHub evidence and the requested mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you benchmark or report a measured speedup or regression, including complete framework flows and compilation of projects that consume the framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

bro

無料

Restate the last message in plain human language, with no jargon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

Build or adapt a local harness to drive, inspect, and profile an interactive CLI or TUI without external services. Use for CLI UX checks, startup regressions, memory leaks, hangs, prompt flows, or terminal demos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

neohaskell/NeoHaskell3482026年10月26日 更新

neohaskell のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する