本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

nw-persona-jtbd-analysis

Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Persona and JTBD Analysis

Use during Phase 1 (GATHER) when the user lacks clear personas or the "Who" section needs rigorous definition. Provides structured alternative to ad-hoc persona descriptions.

Persona Template

For each user type, build a complete persona:

## Persona: {Name}

**Who**: {Role description -- one sentence capturing relationship to product}
**Demographics**:
- {Characteristic 1: e.g., technical proficiency level}
- {Characteristic 2: e.g., frequency of interaction}
- {Characteristic 3: e.g., environment/context of use}
- {Characteristic 4: e.g., primary motivation}

**Jobs-to-be-Done**: (see Job Step Table below)

**Pain Points**:
- {Pain 1} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
- {Pain 2} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}

**Success Metrics**:
- {Quantified outcome 1: e.g., "Task completed in < 2 minutes"}
- {Quantified outcome 2: e.g., "Zero manual configuration steps"}

Job Step Table

Each persona has job steps describing what they accomplish. Steps follow ODI format.

Job StepGoalDesired Outcome
{Verb}{What the user wants to achieve}Minimize {metric} of {undesirable state}

Rules for Job Steps

  • Job Steps are always verbs: Discover, Validate, Install, Configure, Monitor, Recover
  • Goals describe what the user wants, not what the system does
  • Desired Outcomes use ODI format: "Minimize [time/effort/risk/likelihood] of [undesirable state]"
  • Each step maps to a workflow point where value is created or destroyed

Example Job Step Table

Job StepGoalDesired Outcome
DiscoverFind the right tool for the taskMinimize time to evaluate fit
InstallGet the tool running locallyMinimize steps to working state
ConfigureAdapt to local environmentMinimize likelihood of misconfiguration
VerifyConfirm correct installationMinimize uncertainty about readiness
StartBegin productive workMinimize time from install to first output

Pain Point Mapping

Every pain point maps to a specific job step. Pain points without a corresponding step indicate either a missing step or irrelevant pain point.

Pain Point: "I don't know if the tool supports my OS"
  -> Job Step: Discover
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize uncertainty about compatibility

Pain Point: "Installation fails silently with no error message"
  -> Job Step: Install
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize time to diagnose installation failures

Prioritize: pain points on high-frequency job steps deserve attention first.

Success Metric Quantification

Every success metric needs a number or threshold. Qualitative metrics ("easy to use") are not actionable.

QualitativeQuantified
"Easy to install""Install completed in < 2 minutes with zero manual steps"
"Fast startup""First productive output within 30 seconds of launch"
"Reliable""Zero silent failures; all errors produce actionable messages"
"Intuitive""New user completes core task without reading documentation"

Multi-Persona Segmentation

Different users have fundamentally different jobs even when using the same product. Segment by relationship to the product.

Common axes: Frequency (first-time vs returning vs power user) | Role (end user vs admin vs developer) | Context (individual vs team vs CI/CD) | Motivation (exploration vs production vs evaluation)

Example: Same Product, Different Jobs

PersonaPrimary JobKey Difference
ExplorerEvaluate the tool quicklyNeeds fast time-to-value, minimal commitment
ReturnerResume work after absenceNeeds state preservation, quick re-orientation
DeployerInstall for a teamNeeds configuration management, multi-user setup
AutomatorIntegrate into CI/CD pipelineNeeds scriptability, headless operation, exit codes

Each persona gets their own Job Step table because workflows differ. Do not merge personas -- JTBD analysis value comes from surfacing differences.

Integration with Story Crafting

After completing persona analysis, feed results into LeanUX user story template:

  1. Persona Who -> populated from persona template
  2. Persona Pain Points -> inform story Problem section
  3. Job Step Desired Outcomes -> inform AC (ODI outcomes translate to testable criteria)
  4. Success Metrics -> inform NFR requirements in handoff package

Cross-reference: use bdd-requirements skill for Example Mapping once personas established. Use jtbd-workflow-selection skill to determine workflow for resulting stories.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nWave-ai/nWave6162026年9月16日 更新

nWave-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する