本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

making-waffles

Generates WAFFLES Declarations for social media posts — preemptive lists of what a post does NOT say. Use when users mention WAFFLES, ask for clarifications on their post, want to prevent misinterpretation, or request disclaimers for controversial/nuanced takes.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • README.md283 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

WAFFLES Declaration Generator

Generate preemptive clarifications listing what a post explicitly does NOT say, helping low-context readers avoid misinterpretation.

Background

"WAFFLES" originated from Bluesky's October 2025 controversy. A meme satirized how users read hostile implications into innocuous posts: "(bluesky user bursts into Waffle House) OH SO YOU HATE PANCAKES??" CEO Jay Graber's reply of "WAFFLES!" to an off-topic comment sparked platform-wide debate. The term evolved into a declaration format pioneered by @gracekind.net — a preemptive list of things a post does NOT claim.

When Triggered

Generate a WAFFLES Declaration when user:

  • Explicitly requests WAFFLES or "waffle declaration"
  • Asks "what might people misread into this?"
  • Wants to preempt bad-faith interpretations
  • Has a nuanced take on contested territory
  • Says "help me clarify what I'm not saying"

Generation Process

Given post text, produce 12-20 declarations across these dimensions:

CategoryWhat to identify
Emotional scopeExtremes, permanence, or intensity not claimed
UniversalityGeneralizations the author isn't making
Policy/advocacyPositions not being endorsed
JudgmentsEvaluations not being rendered
Temporal claimsTimelines or permanence not asserted
Adjacent hot-takesRelated controversial positions not implied
InversesOpposite claims also not being made
Meta-claimsAuthority or expertise not asserted

Output Format

🧇 WAFFLES DECLARATION 🦋
aka things this post doesn't say:

— [declaration 1]
— [declaration 2]
...

Use varied phrasing:

  • "This post does not claim..."
  • "The author is not saying..."
  • "This is not an argument that..."
  • "Nothing here suggests..."

Quality Criteria

Declarations should be:

  • Plausible: Things a reasonable but uncharitable reader might actually misread
  • Balanced: Include both "sides" when touching contested territory
  • Concise: One line each, clear and direct
  • Useful: Genuinely clarifying, not padding

Prioritize likely misinterpretations over implausible ones. A good declaration makes the reader think "oh, I might have assumed that."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

GitHub repository access in containerized environments using REST API and credential detection. Use when git clone fails, or when accessing private repos/writing files via API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

Decide which model, effort level, and cascade shape each subagent gets, and how to keep improvement loops safe (evaluator-as-selector, stop on regression). Routes on measured cost-per-completed-task rather than per-token price, because a tier's token count varies more by task shape than price varies across tiers. Covers per-model effort semantics, the concision lever, cascade preconditions, context handoff, and watching a subagent fan-out live. Use when choosing a subagent's model or effort, when choosing how to escalate a failed attempt, or when asked which model or effort a task should get. Grounded in a 2026-07 calibration, a 2026-08 coding-cost study, a 2026-09 seeded-bug repair battery, a 2026-10 Haiku 5.5 ladder priced per spawn, and a 2026-10 retry-versus-escalation ladder on 295 SWE-bench Verified tasks; Managed Agents API specifics are operational, not calibrated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

Securely manages API credentials for multiple providers (Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, GitHub). Use when skills need to access stored API keys for external service invocations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

Read Bluesky/ATProto without depending on Bluesky's AppView — interactions on a user's posts, thread replies, any repo's records, network-wide backlinks across every lexicon, an account's handle and PDS history, which collections are active network-wide, and layer-by-layer outage diagnosis. Use when bsky.app or the AppView is down or slow, when a Bluesky read returns timeouts or 5xx, when asked who liked/replied/quoted/reposted something, when pulling live Bluesky context cheaply, when reading records straight from a PDS, when asked who references a record or account anywhere on the network, whether an account has changed handle or migrated servers, or which lexicons and non-Bluesky apps are active on atproto. Complements browsing-bluesky, which routes everything through the AppView and fails when it does.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月12日 更新

oaustegard のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する