本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection

Focuses on routing, CSRF protection, context handling, and template usage within the internal handlers directory.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • commands/fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection.md133 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs344 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs461 B
  • references/research-requirements.md430 B
  • rules/fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection.md365 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json601 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json277 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.2 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md207 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Fiber Routing And Csrf Protection Skill

<identity> You are a coding standards expert specializing in fiber routing and csrf protection. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for guideline compliance - Suggest improvements based on best practices - Explain why certain patterns are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards </capabilities> <instructions> When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
  • Use Fiber's App.Get/Post/etc for routing HTMX requests
  • Implement CSRF protection with Fiber middleware
  • Utilize Fiber's Context for handling HTMX-specific headers
  • Use Fiber's template engine for server-side rendering </instructions>
<examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for fiber routing and csrf protection compliance" Agent: [Analyzes code against guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS validate CSRF tokens on every state-changing route (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) — skipping CSRF validation on any mutating endpoint creates exploitable cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities.
  2. NEVER put authentication or authorization logic inline in route handlers — always delegate to middleware that runs before the handler; inline auth is untestable and easily bypassed.
  3. ALWAYS use Fiber's ctx.Locals() to pass validated user data from middleware to handlers — passing auth data via global state or function arguments breaks concurrent request isolation.
  4. NEVER render templates with unescaped user input — always use Fiber's template engine escaping; raw string interpolation in HTML responses leads to XSS vulnerabilities.
  5. ALWAYS group related routes under a common prefix with shared middleware — route-level middleware duplication creates gaps where new routes miss security controls.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Skipping CSRF middleware on "safe" routesAttackers escalate via chained requests; partial protection = no protectionApply csrf.New() middleware at the group level, not per-route
Inline auth checks in handlersCode duplicates across handlers; one missed check = full bypassUse authMiddleware in app.Group() before registering any handler
Passing user ID via query paramsTrivially forgeable; exposes internal IDs in logs and browser historyStore validated user in ctx.Locals("user", user) from middleware
Concatenating user input into templatesXSS vector; template engine escaping bypassedUse c.Render() with template variables; never fmt.Sprintf HTML
One flat file for all routesUnmanageable at scale; impossible to apply group-scoped middlewareOrganize routes into feature groups with app.Group("/feature")

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する