本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

forum-monitor

Use when monitoring online forums (Reddit, HN, ProductHunt) for recurring user pain points, feature requests, and unmet needs. Invoke for market research, pain-point discovery, trend detection, and competitive intelligence. Designed for scheduled execution via CronCreate.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md9.2 KB
  • commands/forum-monitor.md113 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs130 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs237 B
  • references/research-requirements.md227 B
  • rules/forum-monitor.md255 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json366 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json332 B
  • scripts/main.cjs426 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md229 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Forum Monitor

Overview

Systematic workflow for monitoring online communities to discover recurring user pain points. Transforms unstructured forum discussions into ranked, evidence-backed opportunity reports suitable for automated app generation pipelines.

Core principle: Pain points with high frequency and high engagement are the strongest product signals. Monitor, classify, rank, report.

When to Use

  • Discovering product opportunities from community feedback
  • Running periodic (daily/weekly) market research scans
  • Identifying trending complaints or feature requests
  • Competitive intelligence gathering from user discussions
  • Feeding the app-generation-workflow with validated pain points

Cron Integration

This skill is designed to run on a schedule via CronCreate:

CronCreate({
  name: 'weekly-forum-scan',
  schedule: '0 9 * * MON', // Every Monday at 9 AM
  prompt:
    'Run forum monitor scan for [target domain]. Invoke Skill({ skill: "forum-monitor" }). Save report to .claude/context/reports/backend/',
});

Workflow

Step 1: Configure Target Forums

Define the forums to monitor based on the target domain:

Forum Selection Matrix:

ForumBest ForQuery Pattern
RedditConsumer pain points, UX issuessite:reddit.com <topic> frustrating OR wish
Hacker NewsDeveloper tools, B2B SaaSsite:news.ycombinator.com <topic>
ProductHuntNew product gaps, feature envysite:producthunt.com <topic>
Indie HackersSolo dev pain points, pricingsite:indiehackers.com <topic>
Dev.toDeveloper workflow frictionsite:dev.to <topic> pain OR annoy

Query Templates:

"{topic} frustrating OR annoying OR wish OR need OR missing"
"{topic} alternative to OR better than OR looking for"
"{topic} feature request OR roadmap OR please add"

Step 2: Scrape and Collect

For each configured forum, execute searches and extract content:

// Search for pain points
WebSearch({ query: 'site:reddit.com {topic} frustrating OR wish OR need 2026' });

// Fetch specific threads with high engagement
WebFetch({
  url: '{thread-url}',
  prompt:
    'Extract all complaints, feature requests, and pain points. For each, note the exact quote, upvote count, and whether others agreed.',
});

Collection Requirements:

  • Minimum 20 posts per forum per scan
  • Include posts from the last 30 days (or configurable window)
  • Capture: title, URL, community, engagement (upvotes + comments), date, key quotes

Step 3: Classify Pain Points

Categorize each collected item into one of these categories:

CategorySignal WordsExample
missing-feature"wish", "need", "please add", "roadmap""I wish Notion had offline mode"
workflow-friction"slow", "clunky", "takes forever""It takes 10 clicks to export a PDF"
bug-report"broken", "crashes", "error""The app crashes on large files"
pricing"expensive", "not worth", "free alt""Too expensive for a solo dev"
ux-confusion"confusing", "can't find", "intuitive""I had no idea where settings were"
integration-gap"connect to", "integrate with", "API""No Zapier integration available"

Step 4: Cluster and Deduplicate

Group similar pain points into clusters:

  1. Exact duplicates: same complaint, different posts -> merge, sum engagement
  2. Semantic duplicates: similar complaint, different wording -> cluster, note variants
  3. Related but distinct: same domain, different problems -> keep separate

Step 5: Rank by Opportunity Score

For each cluster, compute:

Opportunity Score = (Frequency x 0.4) + (Engagement x 0.3) + (Recency x 0.2) + (Sentiment Intensity x 0.1)

Where:

  • Frequency: Number of unique posts mentioning this pain point (normalized 0-10)
  • Engagement: Total upvotes + comments across all posts (normalized 0-10)
  • Recency: How recent the complaints are (last 7 days = 10, last 30 days = 5, older = 2)
  • Sentiment Intensity: How strongly negative the language is (0-10)

Step 6: Generate Report

Write structured output to .claude/context/reports/backend/forum-monitor-report-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md:

<!-- Agent: forum-monitor-agent | Task: #{id} | Session: {date} -->

# Forum Monitor Report

**Scan Period**: {start-date} to {end-date}
**Forums Monitored**: {list}
**Total Posts Analyzed**: {count}
**Pain Point Clusters Found**: {count}

## Top Pain Points (Ranked by Opportunity Score)

| Rank | Pain Point | Category | Freq | Engagement | Score | Sources |
| ---- | ---------- | -------- | ---- | ---------- | ----- | ------- |
| 1    | [desc]     | [cat]    | [n]  | [n]        | [n.n] | [n]     |

## Detailed Findings

### 1. [Pain Point Title] (Score: X.X)

**Category**: [type]
**Frequency**: [n] mentions across [n] sources
**Engagement**: [total upvotes] upvotes, [total comments] comments
**Forums**: [list of forums where this appeared]

**Representative Quotes:**

1. "[exact quote]" - [source URL] ([n] upvotes)
2. "[exact quote]" - [source URL] ([n] upvotes)
3. "[exact quote]" - [source URL] ([n] upvotes)

**App Opportunity Assessment:**

- Buildable as standalone app: YES/NO
- Estimated complexity: LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH
- Existing solutions: [list or "none found"]
- Differentiation angle: [what would make a new solution win]

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS cite source URLs for every finding -- unverifiable claims are worthless
  2. NEVER fabricate engagement metrics -- counts must come from actual collected data
  3. ALWAYS cross-reference at least 2 forums before declaring a trend
  4. NEVER include content from private or gated forums -- public content only
  5. ALWAYS include verbatim quotes -- user language is more valuable than agent summaries

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Single-forum reportsOne community is not representativeCross-reference 2+ forums before trending
Subjective rankingPersonal opinion is not dataUse weighted opportunity formula
Missing source URLsDownstream agents cannot validate findingsEvery finding must have a clickable source
Stale data without date rangeTrends from 2024 are not 2026 trendsAlways specify scan period in report header
Over-counting duplicatesSame user posting in 3 threads is not 3 data pointsDeduplicate by unique user + unique complaint

Related Skills

  • browser-automation -- for deeper scraping when WebSearch/WebFetch are insufficient
  • deep-research -- for comprehensive investigation of specific pain points
  • feedback-analysis -- for structured sentiment and NPS analysis

Assigned Agents

AgentRole
forum-monitor-agentPrimary -- executes the full workflow
researcherSupporting -- deeper investigation
app-generator-agentConsumer -- reads reports for app ideas

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

node .claude/lib/memory/memory-search.cjs "forum monitor pain points trends"

Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New monitoring pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Forum access issue -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Scoring model decision -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

oimiragieo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する