Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create structured incident response runbooks with step-by-step procedures, escalation paths, and recovery actions. Use when building runbooks, responding to incidents, or establishing incident response procedures.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Mode: Cognitive/Prompt-Driven — No standalone utility script; use via agent context.
Production-ready templates for incident response runbooks covering detection, triage, mitigation, resolution, and communication.
| Severity | Impact | Response Time | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Complete outage, data loss | 15 min | Production down |
| SEV2 | Major degradation | 30 min | Critical feature broken |
| SEV3 | Minor impact | 2 hours | Non-critical bug |
| SEV4 | Minimal impact | Next business day | Cosmetic issue |
1. Overview & Impact
2. Detection & Alerts
3. Initial Triage
4. Mitigation Steps
5. Root Cause Investigation
6. Resolution Procedures
7. Verification & Rollback
8. Communication Templates
9. Escalation Matrix
# [Service Name] Outage Runbook
## Overview
**Service**: Payment Processing Service
**Owner**: Platform Team
**Slack**: #payments-incidents
**PagerDuty**: payments-oncall
## Impact Assessment
- [ ] Which customers are affected?
- [ ] What percentage of traffic is impacted?
- [ ] Are there financial implications?
- [ ] What's the blast radius?
## Detection
### Alerts
- `payment_error_rate > 5%` (PagerDuty)
- `payment_latency_p99 > 2s` (Slack)
- `payment_success_rate < 95%` (PagerDuty)
### Dashboards
- [Payment Service Dashboard](https://grafana/d/payments)
- [Error Tracking](https://sentry.io/payments)
- [Dependency Status](https://status.stripe.com)
## Initial Triage (First 5 Minutes)
### 1. Assess Scope
```bash
# Check service health
kubectl get pods -n payments -l app=payment-service
# Check recent deployments
kubectl rollout history deployment/payment-service -n payments
# Check error rates
curl -s "http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~'5..'}[5m]))"
```
curl -I https://api.company.com/payments/health| Symptom | Likely Cause | Go To Section |
|---|---|---|
| All requests failing | Service down | Section 4.1 |
| High latency | Database/dependency | Section 4.2 |
| Partial failures | Code bug | Section 4.3 |
| Spike in errors | Traffic surge | Section 4.4 |
# Step 1: Check pod status
kubectl get pods -n payments
# Step 2: If pods are crash-looping, check logs
kubectl logs -n payments -l app=payment-service --tail=100
# Step 3: Check recent deployments
kubectl rollout history deployment/payment-service -n payments
# Step 4: ROLLBACK if recent deploy is suspect
kubectl rollout undo deployment/payment-service -n payments
# Step 5: Scale up if resource constrained
kubectl scale deployment/payment-service -n payments --replicas=10
# Step 6: Verify recovery
kubectl rollout status deployment/payment-service -n payments
# Step 1: Check database connections
kubectl exec -n payments deploy/payment-service -- \
curl localhost:8080/metrics | grep db_pool
# Step 2: Check slow queries (if DB issue)
psql -h $DB_HOST -U $DB_USER -c "
SELECT pid, now() - query_start AS duration, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'active' AND duration > interval '5 seconds'
ORDER BY duration DESC;"
# Step 3: Kill long-running queries if needed
psql -h $DB_HOST -U $DB_USER -c "SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid);"
# Step 4: Check external dependency latency
curl -w "@curl-format.txt" -o /dev/null -s https://api.stripe.com/v1/health
# Step 5: Enable circuit breaker if dependency is slow
kubectl set env deployment/payment-service \
STRIPE_CIRCUIT_BREAKER_ENABLED=true -n payments
# Step 1: Identify error pattern
kubectl logs -n payments -l app=payment-service --tail=500 | \
grep -i error | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20
# Step 2: Check error tracking
# Go to Sentry: https://sentry.io/payments
# Step 3: If specific endpoint, enable feature flag to disable
curl -X POST https://api.company.com/internal/feature-flags \
-d '{"flag": "DISABLE_PROBLEMATIC_FEATURE", "enabled": true}'
# Step 4: If data issue, check recent data changes
psql -h $DB_HOST -c "
SELECT * FROM audit_log
WHERE table_name = 'payment_methods'
AND created_at > now() - interval '1 hour';"
# Step 1: Check current request rate
kubectl top pods -n payments
# Step 2: Scale horizontally
kubectl scale deployment/payment-service -n payments --replicas=20
# Step 3: Enable rate limiting
kubectl set env deployment/payment-service \
RATE_LIMIT_ENABLED=true \
RATE_LIMIT_RPS=1000 -n payments
# Step 4: If attack, block suspicious IPs
kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: block-suspicious
namespace: payments
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: payment-service
ingress:
- from:
- ipBlock:
cidr: 0.0.0.0/0
except:
- 192.168.1.0/24 # Suspicious range
EOF
# Verify service is healthy
curl -s https://api.company.com/payments/health | jq
# Verify error rate is back to normal
curl -s "http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~'5..'}[5m]))" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]'
# Verify latency is acceptable
curl -s "http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=histogram_quantile(0.99,sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))by(le))" | jq
# Smoke test critical flows
./scripts/smoke-test-payments.sh
# Rollback Kubernetes deployment
kubectl rollout undo deployment/payment-service -n payments
# Rollback database migration (if applicable)
./scripts/db-rollback.sh $MIGRATION_VERSION
# Rollback feature flag
curl -X POST https://api.company.com/internal/feature-flags \
-d '{"flag": "NEW_PAYMENT_FLOW", "enabled": false}'
| Condition | Escalate To | Contact |
|---|---|---|
| > 15 min unresolved SEV1 | Engineering Manager | @manager (Slack) |
| Data breach suspected | Security Team | #security-incidents |
| Financial impact > $10k | Finance + Legal | @finance-oncall |
| Customer communication needed | Support Lead | @support-lead |
INCIDENT: Payment Service Degradation
Severity: SEV2
Status: Investigating
Impact: ~20% of payment requests failing
Start Time: [TIME]
Incident Commander: [NAME]
Current Actions:
- Investigating root cause
- Scaling up service
- Monitoring dashboards
Updates in #payments-incidents
UPDATE: Payment Service Incident
Status: Mitigating
Impact: Reduced to ~5% failure rate
Duration: 25 minutes
Actions Taken:
- Rolled back deployment v2.3.4 → v2.3.3
- Scaled service from 5 → 10 replicas
Next Steps:
- Continuing to monitor
- Root cause analysis in progress
ETA to Resolution: ~15 minutes
RESOLVED: Payment Service Incident
Duration: 45 minutes
Impact: ~5,000 affected transactions
Root Cause: Memory leak in v2.3.4
Resolution:
- Rolled back to v2.3.3
- Transactions auto-retried successfully
Follow-up:
- Postmortem scheduled for [DATE]
- Bug fix in progress
### Template 2: Database Incident Runbook
```markdown
# Database Incident Runbook
## Quick Reference
| Issue | Command |
|-------|---------|
| Check connections | `SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity;` |
| Kill query | `SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid);` |
| Check replication lag | `SELECT extract(epoch from (now() - pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp()));` |
| Check locks | `SELECT * FROM pg_locks WHERE NOT granted;` |
## Connection Pool Exhaustion
```sql
-- Check current connections
SELECT datname, usename, state, count(*)
FROM pg_stat_activity
GROUP BY datname, usename, state
ORDER BY count(*) DESC;
-- Identify long-running connections
SELECT pid, usename, datname, state, query_start, query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state != 'idle'
ORDER BY query_start;
-- Terminate idle connections
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid)
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state = 'idle'
AND query_start < now() - interval '10 minutes';
-- Check lag on replica
SELECT
CASE
WHEN pg_last_wal_receive_lsn() = pg_last_wal_replay_lsn() THEN 0
ELSE extract(epoch from now() - pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp())
END AS lag_seconds;
-- If lag > 60s, consider:
-- 1. Check network between primary/replica
-- 2. Check replica disk I/O
-- 3. Consider failover if unrecoverable
# Check disk usage
df -h /var/lib/postgresql/data
# Find large tables
psql -c "SELECT relname, pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(relid))
FROM pg_catalog.pg_statio_user_tables
ORDER BY pg_total_relation_size(relid) DESC
LIMIT 10;"
# VACUUM to reclaim space
psql -c "VACUUM FULL large_table;"
# If emergency, delete old data or expand disk
## Best Practices
### Do's
- **Keep runbooks updated** - Review after every incident
- **Test runbooks regularly** - Game days, chaos engineering
- **Include rollback steps** - Always have an escape hatch
- **Document assumptions** - What must be true for steps to work
- **Link to dashboards** - Quick access during stress
### Don'ts
- **Don't assume knowledge** - Write for 3 AM brain
- **Don't skip verification** - Confirm each step worked
- **Don't forget communication** - Keep stakeholders informed
- **Don't work alone** - Escalate early
- **Don't skip postmortems** - Learn from every incident
## Resources
- [Google SRE Book - Incident Management](https://sre.google/sre-book/managing-incidents/)
- [PagerDuty Incident Response](https://response.pagerduty.com/)
- [Atlassian Incident Management](https://www.atlassian.com/incident-management)
## Iron Laws
1. **ALWAYS** write and test runbooks before an incident occurs — an untested runbook written during an active P0 incident introduces errors when cognitive load is highest.
2. **NEVER** assume operator knowledge in a runbook — write every step as if for a new on-call engineer at 3 AM with no context; assumed knowledge creates fatal gaps under stress.
3. **ALWAYS** include a rollback step for every mitigation action — mitigation steps that cannot be reversed trap teams in a worse state when the fix makes the incident worse.
4. **NEVER** resolve an incident without updating the runbook if a step failed or was missing — unupdated runbooks repeat the same failures in the next incident.
5. **ALWAYS** define explicit escalation triggers with time bounds and contact owners — runbooks without escalation criteria leave operators guessing when to escalate, causing under-escalation or over-escalation.
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Runbooks written during the incident | High stress + cognitive load = errors and gaps; untested steps fail | Write and game-day runbooks before incidents; update post-incident |
| Steps that assume domain knowledge | New on-call engineers fail; team knowledge is a single point of failure | Write each step as a complete command with expected output and failure signal |
| No rollback steps | Mitigation makes incident worse; team is stuck without recovery path | Every `change X` step must have a matching `revert X` step with commands |
| Runbook not updated after incident | Same failure mode repeated in next incident | Mandate runbook review as part of postmortem action items |
| Vague escalation criteria ("escalate if needed") | Under-escalation extends MTTR; over-escalation burns on-call | Define triggers: "escalate after 15 minutes without mitigation progress" |
## Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
**Before starting:**
Read `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`
**After completing:**
- New pattern -> `.claude/context/memory/learnings.md`
- Issue found -> `.claude/context/memory/issues.md`
- Decision made -> `.claude/context/memory/decisions.md`
> ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。