Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Jira project management and issue tracking integration
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Mode: Cognitive/Prompt-Driven - No standalone utility script; use via agent context.
<identity> Jira PM (Project Management) - Provides integration with Atlassian Jira for issue tracking, project management, and workflow automation. Enables 90%+ context savings over direct MCP integration. </identity> <capabilities> - Issue management: search, create, update, transition - Project discovery and metadata retrieval - Sprint management and issue tracking - Comment management on issues - JQL-based advanced queries </capabilities> <requirements> ## Environment VariablesRequired:
Optional:
<tool_categories>
| Tool | Description | Confirmation Required |
|---|---|---|
| search | Search issues using JQL | No |
| get-issue | Get detailed issue information | No |
| create-issue | Create a new issue | Yes |
| update-issue | Update existing issue fields | Yes |
| transition | Change issue status/workflow state | Yes |
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| list-projects | List all accessible projects |
| project-info | Get detailed project information |
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| active-sprint | Get currently active sprint for a board |
| sprint-issues | List all issues in a specific sprint |
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| get-comments | Retrieve all comments on an issue |
| add-comment | Add a comment to an issue |
</tool_categories>
<usage_patterns>
Issue Creation: List projects -> Get project info -> Create issue -> Add comment
Sprint Management: Get active sprint -> List sprint issues -> Update issue status -> Add comments
Issue Search: Use JQL for targeted searches -> Retrieve issue details -> Update issues
</usage_patterns>
<agent_integration>
</agent_integration>
<error_handling>
</error_handling>
<best_practices>
</best_practices> </instructions>
<progressive_disclosure>
Context Savings: 90%+ compared to loading full Jira MCP server </progressive_disclosure>
<api_reference>
See https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/jira/platform/rest/v3/ for full reference. </api_reference>
PUT /issue to change status — Jira status changes must go through valid workflow transitions via POST /issue/{key}/transitions; direct field updates bypass workflow validators and automation rules.summary, issuetype, and project fields when creating an issue — these three fields are the minimum required by Jira Cloud REST API v3; missing any produces a 400 error.| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Updating status via field PUT | Bypasses workflow guards; invalid state transitions succeed silently; automation rules don't fire | Use POST /issue/{key}/transitions with the correct transition ID |
| Fetching all issues and filtering locally | Times out on large projects; wastes API quota; slow for paginated results | Always use JQL with specific project/sprint/status filters |
| Creating issues without duplication check | Splits work tracking; team sees multiple tickets for same task | Search with JQL (project = X AND summary ~ "keyword") before creating |
Hardcoding field IDs (e.g., customfield_10016) | Field IDs differ between Jira instances and cloud/server; breaks across projects | Discover field IDs dynamically via /rest/api/3/field endpoint |
| No error handling for rate limits (429) | Jira Cloud rate limits at ~300 requests/minute; unhandled 429 crashes automation | Implement exponential backoff; check Retry-After header on 429 responses |
Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it is not in memory, it did not happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。