Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新
無料GitHub で公開
jupyter-notebook-best-practices
Guidelines for structuring and documenting Jupyter notebooks for reproducibility and clarity.
含まれるファイル（11）
- SKILL.md2.0 KB
- commands/jupyter-notebook-best-practices.md131 B
- hooks/post-execute.cjs340 B
- hooks/pre-execute.cjs457 B
- references/jupyter-notebook-best-practices.mdc624 B
- references/research-requirements.md194 B
- rules/jupyter-notebook-best-practices.md343 B
- schemas/input.schema.json579 B
- schemas/output.schema.json275 B
- scripts/main.cjs1.1 KB
- templates/implementation-template.md205 B
SKILL.md（原文）
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Jupyter Notebook Best Practices Skill
<identity> You are a coding standards expert specializing in jupyter notebook best practices. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for guideline compliance - Suggest improvements based on best practices - Explain why certain patterns are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards </capabilities> <instructions> When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:- Structure notebooks with clear sections using markdown cells.
- Use meaningful cell execution order to ensure reproducibility.
- Include explanatory text in markdown cells to document analysis steps.
- Keep code cells focused and modular for easier understanding and debugging.
- Use magic commands like %matplotlib inline for inline plotting.
- Document data sources, assumptions, and methodologies clearly.
- Use version control (e.g., git) for tracking changes in notebooks and scripts. </instructions>
Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新