Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content strategy, copywriting frameworks (AIDA/PAS/BAB/4Ps/FAB), editorial calendar management, platform-specific content, A/B testing, campaign planning, audience targeting, and content performance measurement.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Enable marketing-strategist agents to produce high-quality, data-driven marketing content using proven frameworks, structured workflows, and measurable performance loops.
This skill covers the full content lifecycle:
Invoke when asked to:
Input validated against schemas/input.schema.json before execution.
Output contract defined in schemas/output.schema.json.
Pre-execution hook: hooks/pre-execute.cjs
Post-execution hook: hooks/post-execute.cjs
Before writing a single word, define:
Audience Awareness Stages → Framework Match:
| Awareness Stage | Best Framework | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Unaware (cold) | AIDA, PAS | Build attention first; introduce problem |
| Problem-aware | PAS, BAB | Lead with pain, show resolution |
| Solution-aware | 4Ps, FAB | Evidence-based; translate features to value |
| Product-aware | FAB, BAB | Show transformation; competitor contrast |
| Most aware | Direct CTA | Skip education; they are ready |
Organize content into 3-5 pillars per brand/product:
| Channel | Content Type | Goal | Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blog/SEO | Long-form evergreen, 1500-3000 words | Organic traffic | 2-4x/month |
| Thought leadership, case studies | B2B awareness | 3-5x/week | |
| Segmented newsletters, drip sequences | Retention + conversion | 1-3x/week | |
| TikTok/Reels | Short-form video, <60s hooks | Discovery + top-of-funnel | Daily |
| Carousel, events, community posts | Community + retargeting | 3-5x/week |
ATTENTION: Grab with bold claim, stat, or question
INTEREST: Explain relevance to reader's situation
DESIRE: Show transformation, testimonials, proof
ACTION: Single clear CTA (avoid multiple options)
Example (Email subject + body):
Subject: "68% of marketers are wasting their content budget"
[ATTENTION] Most companies publish content nobody reads.
[INTEREST] The difference? A documented content strategy.
[DESIRE] Teams using structured content plans see 3x ROI.
[ACTION] Download the 2025 Content Strategy Playbook →
PROBLEM: Name the exact pain point
AGITATE: Amplify the consequences of inaction
SOLUTION: Present your offer as the logical answer
BEFORE: Describe life with the problem
AFTER: Paint the aspiration/desired state
BRIDGE: Explain how your product/service creates the bridge
PROBLEM: State the problem (brief; audience already aware)
PROMISE: Make a specific, believable claim
PROOF: Evidence (stats, case studies, testimonials)
PROPOSAL: Concrete offer with CTA
FEATURE: What the product has/does
ADVANTAGE: Why that feature matters
BENEFIT: How it improves the customer's life
Month View:
- Content pillars assigned to week blocks
- Platform rotation (ensures channel balance)
- Campaign anchors (product launches, seasonal events, holidays)
- Buffer capacity (20% reserved for reactive/trending content)
Week View:
- Monday: Brief writer + assign assets
- Tuesday-Wednesday: Draft creation
- Thursday: Review + edits
- Friday: Schedule/publish
## Content Brief
**Title/Working Headline**: [H1 target]
**Content Type**: Blog / Email / Social / Ad
**Platform**: [channel]
**Pillar**: Educational / Inspirational / Promotional / Community
**Framework**: AIDA / PAS / BAB / 4Ps / FAB
**Target Audience**: [segment + awareness stage]
**Primary Goal**: [Awareness / Traffic / Lead / Conversion]
**Primary Keyword/Topic**: [keyword or topic]
**CTA**: [exact text + destination]
**Due Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Assigned To**: [human / AI / both]
**Word Count / Length**: [target]
**Assets Needed**: [images, video, graphics]
IDEATION → Content brief draftedIN_PROGRESS → Draft being writtenREVIEW → Awaiting approvalSCHEDULED → Approved + in queuePUBLISHED → LiveMEASURING → Post-publish tracking window (7-30 days)1. HYPOTHESIS: "Changing X to Y will increase Z because [reason]"
2. VARIABLE: Isolate ONE variable per test (subject line, CTA, headline, image)
3. SAMPLE: Minimum 500 impressions per variant for statistical significance
4. DURATION: Run minimum 7 days to account for day-of-week variance
5. METRIC: Define primary metric BEFORE running (CTR, conversion rate, open rate)
| Variable | Impact | Effort | Recommended Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Email subject line | High | Low | 1st |
| Ad headline | High | Low | 2nd |
| CTA text | High | Low | 3rd |
| Landing page hero | High | Medium | 4th |
| Email send time | Medium | Low | 5th |
| Content format (video vs. static) | High | High | 6th |
{
"test_id": "email-subject-2026-03",
"variable": "subject_line",
"variant_a": "68% of marketers waste their budget",
"variant_b": "Is your content strategy costing you money?",
"metric": "open_rate",
"result_a": 0.24,
"result_b": 0.31,
"winner": "b",
"confidence": 0.95,
"applied_to": "all future campaign emails",
"date": "2026-03-01"
}
CAMPAIGN NAME: [descriptive + date range]
OBJECTIVE: [SMART goal: Awareness / Traffic / Leads / Revenue]
AUDIENCE: [Primary segment + targeting parameters]
BUDGET: [total + channel allocation]
CHANNELS: [ranked by expected ROI]
TIMELINE: [start → warm-up → peak → wind-down → analysis]
KPIs: [primary metric + 2-3 supporting metrics]
CONTENT MAP: [content pieces by channel and funnel stage]
| Funnel Stage | Channel | Content Type | Framework | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness | TikTok | 30s tutorial video | AIDA | Reach 50k |
| Awareness | Blog | SEO article | Educational | 1000 organic visits |
| Consideration | Drip sequence (5 emails) | PAS | 500 nurture enrollments | |
| Conversion | Offer email | 4Ps | 50 conversions | |
| Retention | Onboarding sequence | FAB | 80% activation rate |
| KPI | Definition | Target Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Engaged sessions | Sessions >10s with interaction | >60% of sessions |
| Scroll depth | % of page scrolled | >50% to 75% mark |
| Time on page | Average seconds spent | Varies by content type |
| Social shares | Organic amplification | >1% of views |
| KPI | Definition | Target Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| CTR (organic) | Click-through rate from SERP | >3% |
| Email open rate | Opens / delivered | >25% |
| Email CTR | Clicks / opened | >3% |
| Content conversion rate | CTA completions / visitors | >2% |
| KPI | Definition | Target Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Return visit rate | % of visitors who return | >20% in 30 days |
| Email list growth rate | Net new subscribers / total | >5% monthly |
| Unsubscribe rate | Churned / sent | <0.5% |
| KPI | Definition | Target Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Content ROI | (Revenue attributable - cost) / cost | >200% |
| Cost per lead | Total content cost / leads | Varies by industry |
| Customer acquisition cost via content | Total cost / customers | Trending down |
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using AIDA for product-aware audience | Over-educates audience that already knows the problem | Use 4Ps or FAB; lead with proof and offer |
| Cross-posting identical content to all platforms | Platform algorithms penalize non-native formats | Adapt format, length, and tone per platform |
| No A/B testing before scaling ad spend | Intuition-based creative selection leaves 30-40% CTR on the table | Test headlines + CTAs first; scale winners |
| Measuring pageviews as content success | Pageviews measure traffic not content quality | Track engaged sessions and conversion rate |
| Publishing without a content brief | Inconsistent messaging, poor SEO, no clear CTA | Require brief for every piece before writing starts |
| Writing for search engines, not humans | High bounce rate, low engagement, penalized by Google | Write for humans first; optimize secondarily |
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。