Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, review, or restructure Windows node documentation and agent instructions using current source, task-focused explanations, and explicit fact preservation.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use for repository docs, contributor instructions, and skill explanations. A request to audit or plan remains read-only; rewriting requires authorization.
Read documentation ownership, then the target page and the source that owns its claims. Do not preload the entire docs collection.
| Page | First useful result |
|---|---|
| Overview | The reader chooses the appropriate guide |
| Guide | One recommended workflow reaches an observable outcome |
| Reference | A precise contract answers a specific lookup |
| Troubleshooting | A symptom leads to a check, interpretation, and next action |
| Agent instruction | A task routes to its owner, constraints, and required evidence |
State what the page covers and what it does not. Explain the normal path before alternatives. Put prerequisites and safety boundaries before the affected command; place rare cases and exhaustive contracts in named references. Concise means less unnecessary explanation, not an arbitrary word or line cap.
winnode command reference: it is shipped as skill.md
and checked against capability registration. A catalog split is a packaging
change, not an editorial shortcut.For a rewrite or split, use the fact-preservation procedure. Do not turn a documentation request into code cleanup or a repo-wide audit.
Run the existing checks from the repository root:
.\scripts\validate-docs.ps1
.\scripts\validate-agent-skills.ps1
git diff --check
Use test selection for executable changes or shipped command-reference changes. Do not run native runtime proof for ordinary prose changes. Do not claim a command or UI flow was exercised when only its source or documentation was checked.
Report the page's purpose, corrected claims, destinations of moved facts, checks performed, and unresolved claims. Publication needs separate authority.
Windows-owned guidance, informed by the MIT-licensed OpenClaw documentation overlay and refactoring workflow. This is not a synchronized copy. Windows owns its commands, proof requirements, GitHub Markdown conventions, and paired Excalidraw/SVG diagrams.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Crabbox from macOS, Linux, or native Windows controllers to run OpenClaw Windows node builds, tests, and targeted proof on remote native Windows or WSL2 hosts, including Azure or brokered AWS leases and static SSH hosts. Use when remote Windows validation is needed or the user asks for Crabbox validation. Always report the actual provider, lease id, run URL, command, and result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run complete OpenClaw Windows Node issue and PR triage, including landing queues, proof pools, ownership audits, and release planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial dual-model code review that runs two AI models in parallel, cross-references findings, and produces a consensus severity table with fix confidence ratings. Use when asked for a thorough code review, adversarial review, dual-model review, confidence-rated review, or 'Hanselman review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build the native (MSIX, isolated-session) OpenClaw Gateway from the latest openclaw/openclaw sources (or any ref, local checkout, or prebuilt openclaw.tgz), register it side by side with the Microsoft Store Gateway, and run Companion against it with OPENCLAW_NATIVE_GATEWAY_DEV_PATCH. Use when the user asks to test Companion with Gateway main, an unreleased Gateway change, or a source-built native Gateway, or to remove such a build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and collect OpenClaw Windows validation/proof: tests, rubber-duck review, UI evidence, MCP output, and gateway runtime proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。