本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

decommission-validated-system

Decommission a validated computerized system at end-of-life. Covers data retention assessment by regulation, data migration validation (mapping, transformation, reconciliation), archival strategy, access revocation, documentation archival, and stakeholder notification. Use when a validated system is being replaced, reaching end-of-life without replacement, vendor support is discontinued, multiple systems are consolidating, or regulatory changes render a system obsolete.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Decommission Validated System

Plan and execute the controlled retirement of a validated computerized system while preserving data integrity and meeting regulatory retention requirements.

When to Use

  • A validated system is being replaced by a new system
  • A system is reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
  • Vendor discontinues support for a validated product
  • Consolidation of multiple systems into a single platform
  • Regulatory or business changes render a system obsolete

Inputs

  • Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
  • Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
  • Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
  • Optional: Current validation documentation package
  • Optional: Data volume and format inventory
  • Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list

Procedure

Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements

Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:

# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |

### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |

Expected: Every data category has a defined retention period, format requirement, and planned disposition. On failure: If retention requirements are unclear, consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to the longest applicable retention period.

Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)

If data is migrating to a replacement system:

# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |

### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |

### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |

Expected: Migration plan includes mapping, transformation rules, and validation checks that prove data integrity was maintained. On failure: If migration validation fails, do not proceed to decommission. Fix the migration issues and re-validate.

Step 3: Define Archival Strategy

For data that will be archived rather than migrated:

# Archival Strategy

### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |

### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)

### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |

Expected: Archived data is readable, searchable, and verifiable without the original system. On failure: If data cannot be read independently of the source system, the archive is not compliant. Consider exporting to an open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.

Step 4: Execute Decommissioning

# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)

### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture

### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved

### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |

Expected: Decommissioning is controlled, documented, and approved — not just "turn it off." On failure: If any checklist item cannot be completed, document the exception and obtain QA approval before proceeding.

Validation

  • Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
  • Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, and checksums (if applicable)
  • Archive created in a format readable without the source system
  • Archive integrity verified with checksums
  • All user access revoked
  • Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
  • SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
  • Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, and IT

Common Pitfalls

  • Premature decommission: Turning off a system before data migration is validated risks permanent data loss. Complete all validation before pulling the plug.
  • Unreadable archives: Storing data in a proprietary format that requires the original system to read defeats the purpose of archival. Use open formats.
  • Forgotten audit trails: Archiving the data but not the audit trail means the data provenance cannot be demonstrated. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
  • Orphaned SOPs: SOPs that still reference a decommissioned system confuse users and create compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
  • No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until the data is needed for an inspection.

Related Skills

  • design-compliance-architecture — update the system inventory and compliance architecture after decommission
  • manage-change-control — decommissioning is a major change requiring change control
  • write-validation-documentation — migration validation follows the same IQ/OQ methodology
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — retire or update SOPs referencing the decommissioned system
  • prepare-inspection-readiness — archived data must remain accessible for regulatory inspections

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Execute structural metamorphosis using strangler fig migration, chrysalis phases, and interface preservation. Covers transformation planning, parallel running, progressive cutover, rollback design, and post-metamorphosis stabilization for system architecture evolution. Use when assess-form has classified the system as READY for transformation, when migrating from monolith to microservices, when replacing a core subsystem while dependents continue operating, or when any architectural change must be gradual rather than big-bang.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

adaptic

無料

Master skill composing the 5-step synoptic cycle for panoramic synthesis across multiple domains. Orchestrates meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, and express-insight into a coherent process that produces unified understanding rather than sequential compromise. Use when a problem genuinely spans 3+ domains and the interactions between domains matter more than depth in any one, when sequential analysis feels like compromise rather than integration, or before major architectural decisions affecting multiple stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

Scaffold a new puzzle type across all 10+ pipeline integration points in jigsawR. Creates the core puzzle module, wires it into the unified pipeline (generation, positioning, rendering, adjacency), adds ggpuzzle geom/stat layers, updates DESCRIPTION and config.yml, extends the Shiny app, and creates a comprehensive test suite. Use when adding a completely new puzzle type to the package or following the 10-point integration checklist to ensure nothing is missed end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

aikido

無料

Practice aikido as a defensive martial art emphasizing harmony, redirection, and controlled resolution. Covers centering and grounding, ukemi (safe falling and rolling), core techniques (irimi-nage, shiho-nage, kote-gaeshi, ikkyo), blending and tai sabaki (body movement), randori (multiple attacker practice), weapons awareness, and applying principles off the mat. Use when learning a defensive martial art that prioritizes de-escalation, developing the ability to redirect aggression without causing unnecessary harm, building safe falling skills, or cultivating calm centeredness under physical pressure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to identify functions, APIs, and data sources suitable for exposure as MCP tools, producing a tool specification document. Use when planning an MCP server for an existing project, auditing a codebase before wrapping it as an AI-accessible tool surface, comparing what a codebase can do versus what is already exposed via MCP, or generating a tool spec to hand off to scaffold-mcp-server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

pjt222 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する