本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

iterative-loop

Runs continuous AI iteration loops that repeat build-test-fix cycles until success criteria are met. Use when building features requiring test-driven refinement, implementing tasks with clear pass/fail criteria, or automating iterative improvement workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qeスター 515(GitHub 515 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Iterative Loop

Overview

The Iterative Loop skill implements continuous AI-driven development loops that persist until completion criteria are met. Inspired by the Ralph Wiggum technique, this approach enables autonomous, self-correcting development cycles where the AI sees its previous work in files and git history, iteratively improving until success.

Core Philosophy

  1. Iteration > Perfection - Don't aim for perfect on first try; let the loop refine the work
  2. Failures Are Data - Each failure provides information to improve the next attempt
  3. Clear Criteria - Success must be objectively measurable (tests, metrics, validations)
  4. Persistence Wins - Keep trying until success; the loop handles retry logic automatically

Prerequisites

  • Claude Code with session management
  • Clear completion criteria (tests, linting, metrics)
  • Version control (git) for tracking iterations

Quick Start

Basic Iterative Development Pattern

# Define task with clear completion criteria
TASK="Implement user authentication with JWT.
Success criteria:
- All unit tests pass
- Integration tests pass
- No TypeScript errors
- Security audit passes
Output <promise>COMPLETE</promise> when all criteria met."

# Execute iterative loop (conceptual)
while ! task_complete; do
  claude_execute "$TASK"
  check_completion_criteria
done

AQE v3 Integration Example

# Using claude-flow hooks for iterative task
npx --no-install ruflo hooks pre-task --description "Implement auth with iteration" --taskId "auth-impl"

# Store iteration state in memory
npx --no-install ruflo memory store \
  --key "iteration-auth" \
  --value '{"iteration": 1, "maxIterations": 20, "criteria": "all tests pass"}' \
  --namespace iterations

Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1: Define Clear Success Criteria

Essential: Every iterative task MUST have objectively measurable completion criteria.

Good Criteria Examples:

✅ All unit tests pass (npm test returns exit code 0)
✅ Coverage > 80% (coverage report shows 80%+)
✅ No TypeScript errors (tsc --noEmit returns 0)
✅ Linting passes (eslint returns 0)
✅ Performance < 100ms (benchmark shows < 100ms)

Bad Criteria Examples:

❌ "Code looks good" (subjective)
❌ "Works properly" (undefined)
❌ "Well-structured" (no measurable check)

Step 2: Structure the Task with Phases

Break complex tasks into incremental phases:

## Task: Implement User Authentication

### Phase 1: Data Layer
- Create User model with Prisma schema
- Write migration
- Run tests: `npm test -- --grep "User model"`
- Criteria: Model tests pass

### Phase 2: Service Layer
- Implement AuthService with JWT
- Add token generation/validation
- Run tests: `npm test -- --grep "AuthService"`
- Criteria: Service tests pass

### Phase 3: API Layer
- Create /auth/login endpoint
- Create /auth/register endpoint
- Run tests: `npm test -- --grep "auth API"`
- Criteria: API tests pass

### Phase 4: Integration
- End-to-end authentication flow
- Run tests: `npm test`
- Criteria: ALL tests pass

Output <promise>AUTH_COMPLETE</promise> when Phase 4 passes.

Step 3: Implement Safety Mechanisms

Always include escape conditions:

## Safety Rules

1. **Max Iterations**: Stop after 20 attempts
2. **Stuck Detection**: After 5 iterations without progress:
   - Document what's blocking
   - List attempted approaches
   - Suggest alternative strategies
3. **Critical Errors**: Stop immediately if:
   - Database corruption detected
   - Security vulnerability introduced
   - Breaking changes to existing features

Step 4: Execute with Verification

Each iteration should:

  1. Make targeted changes
  2. Run verification (tests, lint, build)
  3. Analyze results
  4. Plan next iteration based on feedback
# Iteration pattern
1. Read previous state (files, git log)
2. Identify remaining work
3. Implement specific change
4. Run verification suite
5. If all pass -> output completion promise
6. If failures -> analyze and continue iteration

Iterative Patterns

Pattern 1: Test-Driven Iteration

## TDD Iteration Task

1. Write failing test for [feature]
2. Implement minimal code to pass test
3. Run `npm test`
4. If test fails -> debug and fix implementation
5. If test passes -> check if more tests needed
6. Repeat until all acceptance tests pass
7. Refactor if needed
8. Output <promise>TDD_COMPLETE</promise>

Pattern 2: Bug Fix Iteration

## Bug Fix Task

1. Write failing test that reproduces bug
2. Implement fix
3. Run test suite
4. If reproduction test fails -> analyze why fix didn't work
5. If other tests fail -> fix regressions
6. If all tests pass -> output <promise>BUG_FIXED</promise>

Max iterations: 10
After 5 iterations without fix:
- Document root cause analysis
- Suggest alternative approaches

Pattern 3: Coverage Improvement Iteration

## Coverage Improvement Task

Target: 80% line coverage

1. Run coverage analysis
2. Identify uncovered code paths
3. Write test for highest-impact uncovered path
4. Run tests with coverage
5. If coverage >= 80% -> output <promise>COVERAGE_ACHIEVED</promise>
6. If coverage < 80% -> continue iteration

Max iterations: 30
Progress check: If coverage doesn't improve for 3 iterations -> analyze blockers

Pattern 4: Performance Optimization Iteration

## Performance Optimization Task

Target: Response time < 100ms

1. Run performance benchmark
2. Identify slowest operation
3. Implement optimization
4. Run benchmark again
5. If target met -> output <promise>PERF_TARGET_MET</promise>
6. If not improved -> try different approach

Max iterations: 15
Record metrics each iteration for trend analysis

Integration with Claude Flow

Memory-Enhanced Iteration

# Store iteration state
npx --no-install ruflo memory store \
  --key "current-iteration" \
  --value '{"task": "auth", "iteration": 5, "lastResult": "2 tests failing"}' \
  --namespace iterations

# Search for similar past iterations
npx --no-install ruflo memory search \
  --query "auth implementation" \
  --namespace iterations

# Learn from successful completions
npx --no-install ruflo hooks post-task \
  --taskId "auth-impl" \
  --success true \
  --quality 0.9

Swarm-Coordinated Iteration

For complex tasks, use multiple agents iterating in parallel:

# Initialize swarm for parallel iteration
npx --no-install ruflo swarm init --topology mesh --max-agents 5

# Spawn specialized iterators
Task("Iterate on unit tests", "Fix failing unit tests until all pass", "tester")
Task("Iterate on integration", "Fix integration tests until all pass", "tester")
Task("Iterate on performance", "Optimize until benchmarks pass", "performance-engineer")

Best Practices

Prompt Engineering for Iteration

Include:

  • Explicit completion criteria with verification commands
  • Phase-based breakdown for complex tasks
  • Safety limits (max iterations)
  • Progress tracking instructions
  • Stuck detection and recovery procedures

Example Well-Structured Prompt:

## Task: Implement Feature X

### Success Criteria (ALL must pass):
1. `npm test` exits with code 0
2. `npm run lint` exits with code 0
3. `npm run typecheck` exits with code 0
4. No console.log statements in production code

### Phases:
1. Write failing tests
2. Implement feature
3. Fix any failures
4. Clean up and refactor

### Safety:
- Max iterations: 20
- After 10 iterations: summarize blockers
- Stop if security issues detected

### Completion:
When ALL success criteria pass, output:
<promise>FEATURE_X_COMPLETE</promise>

When to Use Iterative Loops

Ideal for:

  • Well-defined tasks with measurable success
  • Test-driven development
  • Bug fixing with reproducible tests
  • Coverage improvement
  • Performance optimization
  • Linting/formatting fixes

Not ideal for:

  • Tasks requiring human judgment
  • Design decisions
  • Vague or subjective goals
  • One-time operations
  • Production debugging without tests

Troubleshooting

Issue: Infinite Loop / No Progress

Symptoms: Same errors repeat without improvement

Solutions:

  1. Increase specificity in completion criteria
  2. Add "stuck detection" with alternative approaches
  3. Lower max iterations
  4. Break task into smaller phases

Issue: False Completion

Symptoms: Loop ends but task not actually complete

Solutions:

  1. Add more verification commands
  2. Make completion criteria more explicit
  3. Add integration tests alongside unit tests

Issue: Regression in Later Iterations

Symptoms: Previously passing tests fail after new changes

Solutions:

  1. Add regression check step
  2. Use git to compare iterations
  3. Implement smaller, targeted changes

Related Skills

Resources


Origin: Based on Ralph Wiggum plugin from claude-code repository (anthropics/claude-code) Adapted for: Agentic QE v3 with Claude Flow integration

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

a11y-ally

無料

Use when running comprehensive WCAG accessibility audits with axe-core + pa11y + Lighthouse, generating context-aware remediation, or testing video accessibility. Supports 3-tier browser cascade with graceful degradation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

Master advanced AgentDB features including QUIC synchronization, multi-database management, custom distance metrics, hybrid search, and distributed systems integration. Use when building distributed AI systems, multi-agent coordination, or advanced vector search applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

Implement persistent memory patterns for AI agents using AgentDB. Includes session memory, long-term storage, pattern learning, and context management. Use when building stateful agents, chat systems, or intelligent assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

Optimize AgentDB performance with quantization (4-32x memory reduction), HNSW indexing (150x faster search), caching, and batch operations. Use when optimizing memory usage, improving search speed, or scaling to millions of vectors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe5152026年10月26日 更新

proffesor-for-testing のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する