無料GitHub で公開

email-copy-review

Use this skill when you want an honest review of outreach copy before sending: "roast my cold email", "review this sequence", "why is nobody replying", "score my email". Scores the email on relevance, clarity, proof, ask, length and deliverability risk, quotes the exact lines that hurt, explains why from the reader's point of view, and returns a rewritten version. Works for cold emails, LinkedIn messages and whole sequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

prosyo-ai/gtm-skillスター 11(GitHub 11 + cccskills 0)

連携ツールLinkedIn

実行スコア未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル（2）

SKILL.md3.5 KB
references/review-rubric.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Use this before a campaign goes out, or when results are poor. It produces a scorecard, exact line-level fixes and a rewrite, judged from the reader's side of the inbox.

Inputs

The email, message or full sequence.
Who it is for and what it should achieve.
Results so far, if any.

The play

1. Read it as the recipient

A busy person on a phone, between meetings, who has never heard of you. Note the moment you would stop reading.

2. Score six dimensions

Score each 1-5 using references/review-rubric.md:

Dimension	Question
Relevance	Is it clearly about my situation?
Clarity	Do I understand what they do and why it matters to me in one read?
Proof	Is there a specific, believable reason to trust the claim?
Ask	Is the next step easy and low-commitment?
Brevity	Is every sentence earning its place?
Deliverability	Does anything look like spam or marketing?

3. Quote and fix

For every issue, quote the exact line, say why it hurts from the reader's side, and give the replacement. Prioritise: fix the top three issues first; polishing a weak angle is wasted effort.

4. Rewrite

Return a rewritten version that keeps the sender's offer and proof. Show the word count before and after.

5. Diagnose results (if provided)

Symptom	Most likely cause
High bounce	List quality, not copy
Low replies, few opt-outs	Weak relevance or targeting
Replies mostly negative	Offer or ask mismatch, or wrong persona
Positive replies but few meetings	Slow or weak reply handling
Spam complaints	Volume, targeting or misleading subject

Output format

Score: <total>/30  |  Verdict: send / fix first / rewrite
Top 3 issues: <quoted line - why - fix>
Other notes: <short>
Rewrite (<words before> → <words after>):
<email>

What good looks like

Feedback quotes the email; it never says "make it more personal" without showing how.
Honest but useful: "this reads like a brochure" is followed by the line that proves it and a better line.
The review separates copy problems from list and deliverability problems.
The common mistake is rewriting the whole thing in the reviewer's voice and losing the sender's facts and proof.

Rules

MUST quote the exact line for every criticism.
MUST keep the sender's facts, offer and proof in the rewrite.
NEVER add claims, numbers or customers the sender did not provide.

Example prompts

"Roast this cold email. Be brutal but useful."
"Review our 4-step sequence; replies dropped to 1%."
"Score these three variants and tell me which to send."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

同じリポジトリのスキル

abm-account-plan

無料

Use this skill when you run account-based marketing or sales on a short list of named accounts: "build an ABM plan", "account plan for our top 20", "how do we break into this enterprise account", "1:1 ABM program". Picks the accounts and the ABM tier (1:1, 1:few, 1:many), maps the buying group, writes the account insight and value hypothesis, plans coordinated sales and marketing plays by stage, and sets the metrics (engagement, meetings, pipeline) that show it is working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。