本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

discovery-call

Structure and prepare for a sales discovery call. Use when the user says "prep for discovery call", "discovery call questions", "how to structure my discovery call", "first call with a prospect", "what to ask on a discovery call", "sales call prep", "plan my discovery call", "initial call framework", or wants to prepare for or debrief a first sales conversation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Overview

Based on "SPIN Selling" by Neil Rackham. Rackham's 12-year, 35,000-call research study found that top performers don't pitch - they ask questions in a specific sequence that leads prospects to articulate their own pain and desired outcomes. The SPIN framework (Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff) structures discovery to surface explicit needs before any solution discussion.

Workflow

Step 1: Set call objectives before dialing

Define three things before the call starts:

  • Minimum outcome: the one thing you must leave with (e.g., a confirmed pain point, a next meeting)
  • Ideal outcome: what a perfect call ends with (e.g., confirmed budget, sponsor identified, demo scheduled)
  • Opening statement: one sentence on why this call is worth their 30 minutes

Write these down. Do not improvise the opening.

Step 2: Run Situation questions - establish context (5-8 min)

Gather facts about the prospect's current state. Keep this section short - prospects find these questions low-value. Limit to 3-4 questions.

Examples:

  • "How does your team currently handle [relevant process]?"
  • "How many people are involved in [relevant workflow]?"
  • "What tools are you using today for [relevant area]?"

Do not ask questions whose answers are on their website or LinkedIn. That signals you didn't prepare.

Step 3: Run Problem questions - surface dissatisfaction (8-12 min)

Shift to asking about difficulties, frustrations, and gaps. This is where top performers spend the most time.

Examples:

  • "Where does that process break down for you?"
  • "What's the biggest friction point when [relevant scenario] happens?"
  • "How often does that cause issues downstream?"
  • "What happens when it doesn't work the way you need it to?"

Listen for language that signals explicit pain. Write it down verbatim - you'll use their words back in your proposal.

Step 4: Run Implication questions - expand the problem (5-8 min)

Make the prospect feel the cost of inaction. Connect the problem to business impact: revenue lost, time wasted, team morale, customer churn, competitive risk.

Examples:

  • "When that breaks down, what's the downstream effect on [team/metric/customer]?"
  • "How much time does your team spend working around that?"
  • "What does that mean for your [quarterly target / renewal rate / customer satisfaction]?"
  • "If this isn't solved in the next six months, what happens?"

You are not inventing urgency - you are helping them calculate the cost of the status quo.

Step 5: Run Need-Payoff questions - let them sell themselves (5 min)

Ask questions that get the prospect to articulate the value of solving the problem. Do not pitch. Let them describe the benefit.

Examples:

  • "If you could eliminate that friction, what would that unlock for your team?"
  • "How valuable would it be to get that time back?"
  • "What would it mean for your roadmap if this was no longer a bottleneck?"

The prospect describing the solution in their own words is worth more than any demo slide.

Step 6: Confirm, summarize, and advance

Before ending the call:

  1. Summarize what you heard: "So the core issue is [X], and if left unaddressed it impacts [Y]. Is that right?"
  2. Confirm explicit interest: "Does solving this feel like a priority right now?"
  3. Propose a specific next step with a date: "I'd like to put together a recommendation and walk through it with your team on [date]. Does that work?"

Never leave a call with "I'll follow up." Leave with a confirmed next step.

Anti-Patterns

1. Pitching too early Bad: "Great, sounds like you have [problem] - we actually solve that. Let me show you how..." Good: Ask an Implication question to expand the problem before saying anything about your product.

2. Asking Situation questions you could have researched Bad: "How many employees does your company have?" Good: "Your team grew 40% last year - how has that affected your [relevant process]?"

3. Treating a surface-level pain as a green light Bad: Moving to demo scheduling the moment a prospect says "yeah, that's a challenge for us." Good: Follow up with an Implication question to understand scope and severity before advancing.

4. Vague next steps Bad: "I'll send over some materials and we can reconnect." Good: "Can we put 45 minutes on the calendar for Thursday at 2pm? I'll bring [specific deliverable]."

Quality Checklist

  • Wrote down minimum outcome and ideal outcome before the call
  • Asked fewer than 5 Situation questions - did not over-research on the call
  • Asked at least 2 Implication questions that tied the problem to business impact
  • Asked at least 1 Need-Payoff question and let the prospect answer fully
  • Captured the prospect's exact words for their pain and desired outcome
  • Left the call with a specific next step confirmed (not "I'll follow up")
  • Did not pitch the product before the prospect articulated an explicit need

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Design clean and consistent APIs. Use when the user says "design an API", "API design review", "design these endpoints", "REST API for X", "GraphQL schema", "API contract", "how should this endpoint work", "review my API design", or wants to create or improve an API interface - even if they don't explicitly say "API design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

qa-aman のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する