本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

one-on-one

Structure and run effective 1:1 meetings with direct reports using Camille Fournier's Manager's Path and Andy Grove's High Output Management frameworks. Use when a manager says "help me structure my 1:1s", "my 1:1s feel like status updates", "I don't know what to talk about in 1:1s", "my reports don't open up", "how do I make 1:1s useful", "what questions should I ask in 1:1s", or "I need a 1:1 template". Also trigger when someone mentions their 1:1s feel transactional, that they keep canceling them, or that they're not sure if their report is happy.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Overview

Based on "The Manager's Path" by Camille Fournier and "High Output Management" by Andy Grove. Grove's core insight: the 1:1 is the employee's meeting, not the manager's. Its purpose is to surface information the manager would not otherwise get - problems, morale, blockers, aspirations. Fournier adds the career dimension: the 1:1 is where you build the relationship that makes all other conversations (feedback, promotion, hard decisions) possible. A 1:1 that is purely a status update is a wasted hour.

The 1:1 Operating Model

Frequency: Weekly for new reports (first 3-6 months), every 2 weeks for established reports. Never less than monthly. Canceling 1:1s signals they are not a priority - the report reads that signal.

Length: 30 minutes minimum. 45-60 minutes for complex situations, career conversations, or performance discussions.

Owner: The report owns the agenda. The manager owns the follow-through. If the report comes with nothing, that is information - either they don't understand the purpose of 1:1s, or they don't feel safe raising things.

Format: Running shared doc. Both parties add to it before the meeting. History is visible - follow-ups don't fall through gaps.

Workflow

Step 1: Set Up the 1:1 Doc

Create a shared doc with this structure:

1:1 - [Manager] + [Report]
Cadence: [weekly / biweekly]

[Date]
Report agenda:
  -

Manager agenda:
  -

Follow-ups from last time:
  -

Notes:

Tell your report explicitly: "This is your meeting. Add whatever is on your mind before we meet. I'll add anything I need to cover, but your items come first."

Step 2: Open Questions (Use These to Start)

Do not open with project status. Open with one of these:

For general 1:1s:

  • "What's on your mind this week?"
  • "What's been hardest or most frustrating?"
  • "What are you most excited about right now?"
  • "Is there anything you're stuck on that I can help with?"
  • "What's something you've noticed that I might not be aware of?"

For career-focused 1:1s (run quarterly):

  • "Where do you want to be in 2 years? What does that look like for you?"
  • "What parts of your work feel like your best work?"
  • "What skills do you want to build this quarter?"
  • "Is there a project or responsibility you want to take on?"

For struggling reports:

  • "What would make your work feel easier or better?"
  • "What's something I'm doing that isn't helping you?"
  • "If you could change one thing about how we work together, what would it be?"

Step 3: Four Topics to Cover Across 1:1s

Not every topic in every meeting. Rotate them based on what the report raises. Over a month, make sure all four get covered.

1. Current work and blockers What are they working on, what's in the way, what decisions need to be made. This is the status-update layer - keep it brief. If there are no blockers, move on. Do not spend 30 minutes here.

2. Team and relationships How is collaboration going? Are there interpersonal tensions? Are they getting what they need from teammates or stakeholders? This surfaces problems early before they become escalations.

3. Growth and career What are they working toward? What feedback do they need? What's their next challenge? This is where you have the career conversation most managers avoid until review time.

4. Your feedback and their feedback to you Deliver specific feedback (positive and corrective). Invite feedback on your own behavior: "What's something I could do differently that would help you?" This models the behavior you want.

Step 4: Follow-Up Protocol

End every 1:1 with explicit follow-ups:

Follow-ups from this meeting:
  - [Report] will [specific action] by [date]
  - [Manager] will [specific action] by [date]

At the start of the next 1:1, review these before anything else. Skipped follow-ups tell the report their items aren't tracked. That trust, once lost, is hard to rebuild.

Step 5: Signals to Watch For

These patterns in 1:1s indicate problems that need attention:

SignalWhat it meansResponse
Report never has agenda itemsDoesn't feel safe raising issues, or doesn't understand the purposeHave a meta-conversation about what 1:1s are for
Conversation is always surface-levelLow psychological safety or disengagementAsk one level deeper: "What's really going on?"
Report cancels repeatedlyEither very busy (check on workload) or disengaged from the relationshipAddress directly, don't let it slide
Same problems come up every weekSystemic issue not being resolvedStop treating the symptom - fix the root cause
Report mentions the team in passingThere may be an interpersonal issue they're not raising directlyProbe gently: "Tell me more about that"

Anti-Patterns

1. 1:1 as status meeting Bad: Spending the 30 minutes walking through Jira tickets and project updates. Good: You can read Jira. The 1:1 is for things that don't surface in writing - morale, friction, growth, what the person is actually thinking. Status belongs in standup, not 1:1.

2. Manager dominating the agenda Bad: Coming with 10 things to cover and barely asking the report anything. Good: The report's items come first. Always. Your items are secondary and can often be handled asynchronously.

3. Canceling 1:1s Bad: Canceling when you're busy or have a conflict. Good: Protect 1:1s more than almost any other meeting. Canceling signals that this person is low priority. If you must cancel, reschedule in the same week.

4. No shared doc, no follow-ups Bad: Verbal conversation that disappears immediately. Good: A running shared doc creates accountability, continuity, and a record. Without it, the same problems recur because nothing is tracked.

5. Waiting for the performance review for career conversations Bad: Discussing growth and promotion only during the annual review cycle. Good: Career conversations in 1:1s (quarterly minimum) mean no one is surprised by a promotion decision or performance rating. Build the relationship before you need it for hard conversations.

Quality Checklist

  • Report owns the agenda and added items before the meeting
  • Meeting opened with a question, not a status request
  • At least one of the four topic areas covered beyond current work
  • Specific follow-ups written down with owners and dates
  • Follow-ups from the previous meeting reviewed at the start
  • No 1:1 canceled without same-week reschedule
  • Feedback (positive or corrective) delivered at least once every 2 weeks

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

Design clean and consistent APIs. Use when the user says "design an API", "API design review", "design these endpoints", "REST API for X", "GraphQL schema", "API contract", "how should this endpoint work", "review my API design", or wants to create or improve an API interface - even if they don't explicitly say "API design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年9月10日 更新

qa-aman のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する