本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

orchestrate

Apply the Workflow Orchestration methodology for complex, multi-step tasks — plan-first approach, subagent strategy, self-improvement loop, verification before done, elegant solutions, and autonomous bug fixing. Use for any non-trivial task with 3+ steps or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Orchestrate — Complex Task Orchestration

Apply workflow orchestration methodology for multi-step tasks with 3+ steps or architectural decisions.

How to use

  • /orchestrate <task> — plan-first approach for any non-trivial task

Methodology

1. Plan first (invoke writing-plans skill)

Always start by invoking the writing-plans skill (or native plan mode if your platform has it) to produce a structured plan with TDD-style task steps. Write it to wherever writing-plans puts plans for this repo — do not assume a fixed path. Do not proceed to coding until the plan is written and reviewed.

  • If something goes sideways mid-task: STOP, re-plan using writing-plans again
  • Track progress via tasks/todo.md checkboxes

2. Use subagents (fan out independent work)

  • Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents
  • Keep main context window clean and focused
  • One task per subagent for precision
  • Invoke the subagents skill for the fan-out ladder and standard return contract

Once the plan splits into independent workstreams, do not implement them serially. Fan them out using the ladder from the subagents skill (Workflow tool → parallel subagents → serial fallback):

plan (writing-plans)
  → parallel implementation subagents     # one per independent workstream, isolated
      each returns { summary, files[], diff, risks[], confidence }
  → gather the structured diffs
  → independent reviewer subagent          # fresh context, runs /code-review — no self-review bias
      returns { findings[]{severity,file,detail}, verdict }
  → merge / verify gate                    # apply, run /gate, only then mark done

Reference dispatching-parallel-agents and subagent-driven-development for the mechanics. Use worktree isolation when subagents edit files in parallel so they don't collide. Workstreams that share state (same module, ordering dependency) stay serial.

3. Self-improvement loop

  • After any correction: note the pattern in tasks/lessons.md
  • Review lessons at session start for relevant context

4. Verify before done

  • Never mark complete without proving it works
  • Run tests, check logs, diff behaviour vs main
  • Ask: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"

5. Demand elegance

  • After a working but messy fix: "Implement the elegant solution"
  • Skip this for simple, obvious fixes

6. Autonomous bug fixing

  • When given a bug: investigate and fix. Do not wait for hand-holding.
  • Pair with /fix for CI failures and log-based bugs.

Task Management

  1. Write plan → tasks/todo.md
  2. Check in before implementation starts
  3. Mark items complete as you go
  4. Document results in review section
  5. Capture lessons → tasks/lessons.md

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Act as a Senior Accessibility Engineer to audit a page, component, or design against WCAG 2.2 AA. Produces a triaged finding list (critical/serious/moderate), focus-order map, contrast report, ARIA decision tree, and a screen-reader test plan. Use when shipping new UI, hardening an existing flow, or preparing for VPAT/accessibility conformance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment — "split test," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," or comparing two versions. For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking. For page-level conversion optimization, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, full variations — for any paid platform; 'ad copy variations,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'creative testing,' 'write me some ads.' For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

ai-seo

無料

When the user wants content cited by LLMs or surfaced in AI-generated answers — 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude,' 'AI citations,' 'zero-click search.' For traditional technical/on-page audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement — "GA4," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "tracking plan," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or how to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

architect

無料

Architectural decision advisor for cloud, data, and SaaS distributed systems. Use when the user asks "should we use X or Y", weighs a tradeoff, or needs a decision matrix, scaling analysis, cost-at-scale review, data-tier design, multi-tenancy model, or API/resilience guidance. For full technical blueprints, use enterprise-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

rajitsaha のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する