本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

sales-enablement

When the user wants sales collateral — 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'objection handling,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'help my sales team' — any asset that helps reps close deals. For comparison pages and battle cards, see competitor-alternatives; website copy, copywriting; prospecting, cold-email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md13.2 KB
  • evals/evals.json6.3 KB
  • references/deck-frameworks.md7.5 KB
  • references/demo-scripts.md11.5 KB
  • references/objection-library.md13.1 KB
  • references/one-pager-templates.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Sales Enablement

Create B2B sales collateral reps actually use — decks, one-pagers, objection docs, demo scripts, and playbooks that help close deals.

Before Starting

Product context: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it first and tailor output to it; only ask for what it doesn't cover.

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

  1. Value Proposition & Differentiators — What do you sell and who is it for? What makes you different from the next best alternative? What outcomes can you prove?
  2. Sales Motion — How do you sell (self-serve, inside sales, field sales, hybrid)? Average deal size and cycle length? Key personas in the buying decision?
  3. Collateral Needs — What specific assets, for what funnel stage, used by whom (AE, SDR, champion, prospect)?
  4. Current State — What materials exist, what's working and what's not, what do reps ask for most?

Core Principles

Sales Uses What Sales Trusts

Involve reps in creation and use their language, not marketing's. If reps rewrite your deck before sending it, you wrote the wrong deck. Test drafts with top performers first.

Situation-Specific, Not Generic

Tailor to persona, deal stage, and use case. A CTO deck differs from a VP of Sales deck; a post-meeting one-pager differs from a trade show handout.

Scannable Over Comprehensive

Reps need information in 3 seconds, not 30 — bold headers, short bullets, visual hierarchy. If a rep can't find the answer mid-call, the doc has failed.

Tie Back to Business Outcomes

Every claim connects to revenue, efficiency, or risk reduction. Replace "AI-powered analytics" with "cut reporting time by 80%."


Sales Deck / Pitch Deck

10-12 Slide Framework

  1. Current World Problem — The pain your buyer lives with today
  2. Cost of the Problem — What inaction costs (time, money, risk)
  3. The Shift Happening — Market or technology change creating urgency
  4. Your Approach — How you solve it differently
  5. Product Walkthrough — 3-4 key workflows, not a feature tour
  6. Proof Points — Metrics, logos, analyst recognition
  7. Case Study — One customer story told well
  8. Implementation / Timeline — How they get from here to live
  9. ROI / Value — Expected return and payback period
  10. Pricing Overview — Transparent, tiered if applicable
  11. Next Steps / CTA — Clear action with timeline

Deck Principles

  • Story arc, not feature tour. The world has a problem, there's a better way, here's proof, here's how to get there.
  • One idea per slide. Two points = two slides.
  • Design for presenting, not reading. Slides support the conversation, not replace it — minimal text, strong visuals.

Customization by Buyer Type

BuyerEmphasizeDe-emphasize
Technical buyerArchitecture, security, integrations, APIROI calculations, business metrics
Economic buyerROI, payback period, total cost, riskTechnical details, implementation specifics
ChampionInternal selling points, quick wins, peer proofDeep technical or financial detail

For full slide-by-slide guidance: See references/deck-frameworks.md


One-Pagers / Leave-Behinds

When to Use

  • Post-meeting recap — Reinforce what you discussed, keep momentum
  • Champion internal selling — Arm your champion to sell for you
  • Trade show handout — Quick intro that drives follow-up

Structure

  1. Problem statement — The pain in one sentence
  2. Your solution — What you do and how
  3. 3 differentiators — Why you vs. alternatives
  4. Proof point — One strong metric or customer quote
  5. CTA — Clear next step with contact info

Design Principles

  • One page, literally. Front only, or front and back maximum.
  • Scannable in 30 seconds: bold headers, short bullets, whitespace.
  • Include your logo, website, and a specific contact (not info@).
  • Match your brand but keep it clean — a sales tool, not a brand piece.

For templates by use case: See references/one-pager-templates.md


Objection Handling Docs

Objection Categories

CategoryExamples
Price"Too expensive," "No budget this quarter," "Competitor is cheaper"
Timing"Not the right time," "Maybe next quarter," "Too busy to implement"
Competition"We already use X," "What makes you different?"
Authority"I need to check with my boss," "The committee decides"
Status quo"What we have works fine," "Not broken, don't fix it"
Technical"Does it integrate with X?," "Security concerns," "Can it scale?"

Response Framework

For each objection, document:

  1. Objection statement — Exactly how reps hear it
  2. Why they say it — The real concern behind the words
  3. Response approach — How to acknowledge and redirect
  4. Proof point — Specific evidence that addresses the concern
  5. Follow-up question — Keep the conversation moving forward

Two Formats

  • Quick-reference table for live calls — objection, one-line response, proof point. Fits on one screen.
  • Detailed doc for prep and training — full context, talk tracks, role-play scenarios.

For the full objection library: See references/objection-library.md


ROI Calculators & Value Props

Calculator Design

Inputs (current-state metrics from the prospect): time spent on manual processes, current tool costs, error rates or inefficiency metrics, team size.

Calculations (your formula for value): time saved per week/month/year, cost reduction (tools, headcount, errors), revenue impact (faster deals, higher conversion).

Outputs (what the prospect sees): annual ROI percentage, payback period in months, total 3-year value.

Value Prop by Persona

PersonaCares AboutLead With
CTO / VP EngArchitecture, scale, security, team velocityTechnical superiority, integration depth
VP SalesPipeline, quota attainment, rep productivityRevenue impact, time savings per rep
CFOTotal cost, payback period, riskROI, cost reduction, financial predictability
End userEase of use, daily workflow, learning curveTime saved, frustration eliminated

Implementation Options

  • Spreadsheet — Fastest to build, easy to customize per deal. Works for inside sales.
  • Web tool — More polished, captures leads, scales better. Worth building if deal volume is high.
  • Slide-based — ROI story embedded in the deck. Good for executive presentations.

Demo Scripts & Talk Tracks

Script Structure

  1. Opening (2 min) — Context setting, agenda, confirm goals for the call
  2. Discovery recap (3 min) — Summarize what you learned, confirm priorities
  3. Solution walkthrough (15-20 min) — 3-4 key workflows mapped to their pain
  4. Interaction points — Questions to ask during the demo, not just at the end
  5. Close (5 min) — Summarize value, propose next steps with timeline

Talk Track Types

TypeDurationFocus
Discovery call30 minQualify, understand pain, map buying process
First demo30-45 minShow 3-4 workflows tied to their pain
Technical deep-dive45-60 minArchitecture, security, integrations, API
Executive overview20-30 minBusiness outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment

Key Principles

  • Demo after discovery, not before. Without their pain, you're guessing which features matter.
  • Customize to their use case. Their terminology, their data (if possible), their workflow.
  • Leave time for questions. A demo where the prospect doesn't talk doesn't close.

For full script templates: See references/demo-scripts.md


Case Study Briefs (Sales Format)

Marketing case studies tell a story; sales case studies arm reps with fast-access proof. Keep them short, outcome-focused, and tagged for retrieval.

Structure

  1. Customer profile — Industry, company size, buyer role
  2. Challenge — What they were struggling with (2-3 sentences)
  3. Solution — What they implemented (1-2 sentences)
  4. Results — 3 specific metrics (before/after)
  5. Pull quote — One sentence from the customer
  6. Tags — Industry, use case, company size, persona

Organization

Organize so reps find the right one instantly:

  • By industry — "Show me a case study for healthcare"
  • By use case — "Show me someone who used us for X"
  • By company size — "Show me an enterprise example"

Proposal Templates

Structure

  1. Executive summary — Their challenge, your solution, expected outcome (1 page max)
  2. Proposed solution — What you'll deliver, mapped to their requirements
  3. Implementation plan — Timeline, milestones, responsibilities
  4. Investment — Pricing, payment terms, what's included
  5. Next steps — How to move forward, decision timeline

Customization Guidance

  • Mirror their language from discovery calls
  • Reference specific pain points they mentioned
  • Include only relevant case studies (same industry or use case)
  • Name the stakeholders you've spoken with

Common Mistakes

  • Too long — Over 10 pages won't get read. Aim for 5-7.
  • Too generic — Templated proposals signal low effort. Customize the exec summary at minimum.
  • Burying the price — Don't make them hunt for it. Be transparent and confident.

Sales Playbooks

What Goes in a Playbook

  • Buyer profile — Who you're selling to, their goals and pains
  • Qualification criteria — BANT, MEDDIC, or your framework
  • Discovery questions — Organized by topic, not a script
  • Objection handling — Top 10 objections with responses
  • Competitive positioning — How you win against each competitor
  • Demo flow — Recommended sequence for each persona
  • Email templates — Follow-up, proposal, check-in, breakup

When to Build

  • New product launch — Reps need a single source of truth
  • New market segment — Different buyers need different approaches
  • New hire ramp — Playbooks cut ramp time significantly

Keeping It Living

Playbooks die when not updated. Review quarterly, get input from top reps, remove anything outdated, and assign an owner — unowned playbooks rot.


Buyer Persona Cards

Card Structure

FieldDescription
Role / titleCommon titles and reporting structure
GoalsWhat success looks like for them
PainsWhat frustrates them daily
Top objectionsThe 3-5 objections you'll hear from this role
Evaluation criteriaHow they judge solutions
Buying processTheir role in the decision, who they influence
Messaging angleThe one sentence that resonates most

Persona Types

  • Economic buyer — Signs the check. Cares about ROI and risk.
  • Technical buyer — Evaluates the product. Cares about capabilities and integration.
  • End user — Uses it daily. Cares about ease and workflow fit.
  • Champion — Advocates internally. Needs ammunition to sell for you.
  • Blocker — Opposes the purchase. Understand their concern to neutralize it.

Output Format

AssetDeliverable
Sales deckSlide-by-slide outline with headline, body copy, and speaker notes
One-pagerFull copy with layout guidance (visual hierarchy, sections)
Objection docTable format: objection, response, proof point, follow-up
Demo scriptScene-by-scene with timing, talk track, and interaction points
ROI calculatorInput fields, formulas, output display with sample data
PlaybookStructured document with table of contents and sections
Persona cardOne-page card format per persona
ProposalSection-by-section copy with customization notes

Task-Specific Questions

If context is missing, ask:

  1. What collateral do you need? (deck, one-pager, objection doc, etc.)
  2. Who will use it? (AE, SDR, champion, prospect)
  3. What sales stage is it for? (prospecting, discovery, demo, negotiation, close)
  4. Who is the target persona? (title, seniority, department)
  5. What are the top 3 objections you hear most?

Related Skills

  • competitor-alternatives: For public-facing comparison and alternative pages
  • copywriting: For marketing website copy
  • cold-email: For outbound prospecting emails
  • revops: For lead lifecycle, scoring, routing, and pipeline management
  • pricing-strategy: For pricing decisions and packaging
  • product-marketing-context: For foundational positioning and messaging

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Act as a Senior Accessibility Engineer to audit a page, component, or design against WCAG 2.2 AA. Produces a triaged finding list (critical/serious/moderate), focus-order map, contrast report, ARIA decision tree, and a screen-reader test plan. Use when shipping new UI, hardening an existing flow, or preparing for VPAT/accessibility conformance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment — "split test," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," or comparing two versions. For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking. For page-level conversion optimization, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, full variations — for any paid platform; 'ad copy variations,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'creative testing,' 'write me some ads.' For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

ai-seo

無料

When the user wants content cited by LLMs or surfaced in AI-generated answers — 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude,' 'AI citations,' 'zero-click search.' For traditional technical/on-page audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement — "GA4," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "tracking plan," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or how to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

architect

無料

Architectural decision advisor for cloud, data, and SaaS distributed systems. Use when the user asks "should we use X or Y", weighs a tradeoff, or needs a decision matrix, scaling analysis, cost-at-scale review, data-tier design, multi-tenancy model, or API/resilience guidance. For full technical blueprints, use enterprise-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rajitsaha/100xprism102026年10月14日 更新

rajitsaha のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する