本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

form-strategy

Design forms that convert, validate well, resist spam, and integrate cleanly with downstream systems. Use this skill when designing or auditing any form (contact, signup, checkout, multi-step, embedded), planning validation logic, fighting spam, choosing form tooling, or improving form conversion. Triggers on form design, form validation, form conversion, multi-step form, form spam, captcha, honeypot, form abandonment, signup form, contact form. Also triggers when form completion rates are low or spam is overwhelming.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md11.2 KB
  • README.md354 B
  • references/form-anatomy-checklist.md8.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Form Strategy

Forms are where intent becomes action. Design them well or lose conversions, frustrate users, and drown in spam. Stack-agnostic.


When to use

  • Designing or redesigning a form
  • Conversion is dropping on a key form
  • Spam volume is overwhelming the inbox or database
  • Auditing forms across a site
  • Planning validation logic
  • Choosing form tooling (form service, custom build, no-code)
  • Integrating forms with CRM, email, or other downstream systems
  • Multi-step form decisions

When NOT to use

  • Generic conversion optimization (use cro-optimization)
  • The copy on the form (use landing-page-copy)
  • Backend handling beyond form-specific concerns (use frontend-component-build, code-review-web)
  • General accessibility (use accessibility-audit)

Required inputs

  • The form's purpose (what action, what outcome)
  • Current form (URL, screenshot, or fields)
  • Current performance (completion rate, spam rate, conversion to next step)
  • Downstream system (where submissions go: CRM, email, database, support tool)
  • Business context (volume, urgency of leads, cost of false vs missed signups)

The framework: 5 dimensions

Every form decision falls into one of these dimensions.

Dimension 1: Field strategy

The biggest lever. Every additional field reduces conversion.

Questions to ask for each field:

  • Is this required to deliver value to the user?
  • Is this required to deliver value to the business?
  • Can it be inferred from another source (email domain, behavior, context)?
  • Can it be asked later (after first contact, on second visit, on settings page)?

Default rule: ask for the minimum to make the next step happen. Everything else later.

For a B2B contact form: name and email get you started. Phone, company size, role are nice-to-haves that often hurt conversion more than they help qualification.

For a checkout: country, postal code, address, name, payment. Anything else (referral source, marketing opt-in, account creation) is optional or moved to post-purchase.

Dimension 2: Field design

How each field looks and behaves.

  • Labels above inputs beat placeholders. Placeholder labels disappear when typing.
  • Inline labels (floating labels) work for very compact forms.
  • Single column for almost every form. Eyes flow vertically.
  • Logical grouping with visible spacing. Don't put unrelated fields next to each other.
  • Right input type: email for emails, tel for phone, number for numbers, date for dates. Mobile keyboards adapt.
  • Autocomplete attributes: autocomplete="email", autocomplete="given-name", etc. Browsers and password managers fill them in.
  • Sensible defaults for fields where one applies (country pre-selected by IP, etc.). Don't default to anything that would mislead if wrong.

Dimension 3: Validation

Tell users what's wrong, when, and how to fix it.

  • Validate on blur, not on every keystroke. Inline errors that appear as someone types are jarring.
  • Re-validate on submit (catch fields the user skipped).
  • Specific messages: "Email must include @" beats "Invalid email."
  • Position errors next to the field they refer to.
  • Don't submit a form when there are errors. Highlight the first errored field. Scroll to it.
  • Validate server-side too. Client validation is UX. Server validation is correctness.

For format-flexible fields (phone numbers, postal codes), validate liberally. Reject only what's clearly wrong, not what's "non-standard." Many phone formats exist.

Dimension 4: Spam defense

Public forms attract spam. Plan for it from day one.

Layered defense:

  1. Honeypot field. A hidden field that humans don't fill in but bots do. If it's filled, reject silently. Free, low-friction, surprisingly effective for low-effort spam.
  2. Time-based detection. Reject submissions completed in under 2-3 seconds (bots) or after very long delays (suspicious sessions).
  3. Rate limiting. Reject if the same IP submits too many times.
  4. CAPTCHA as a last resort. Modern invisible CAPTCHAs (hCaptcha, reCAPTCHA v3, Turnstile) are low-friction. Old image CAPTCHAs are conversion-killers.
  5. Behavioral signals. Did the cursor move? Was there scroll? Modern services track this.
  6. Content filtering. Reject obvious spam content (links, foreign-language content if your audience is local, common spam words).
  7. Server-side review. A queue rather than direct delivery to inboxes for high-spam-target forms.

For most contact forms: honeypot + time check + Turnstile (or similar) is sufficient.

Dimension 5: Submission flow

What happens after submit.

  • Inline success message for short forms. Don't redirect just to confirm.
  • Confirmation page for high-value submissions (to provide next steps, set expectations).
  • Email confirmation for signups, purchases, RSVPs. Always.
  • Save data on errors so the user doesn't re-enter everything.
  • Optimistic UI (show success before the server confirms) for low-stakes forms; risky for high-stakes.

For multi-step forms:

  • Show progress (3 of 5)
  • Save state between steps (in case of refresh or navigation)
  • Allow back navigation without losing data
  • Validate per step, not just at the end

Workflow

Step 1: Audit current state

For each form on the site:

  • What's its purpose?
  • Number of fields, required vs optional
  • Current completion rate
  • Current spam rate
  • Validation rules
  • What happens after submit
  • Where the data goes downstream

Step 2: Define success per form

Different forms have different success metrics:

  • Lead form: qualified leads (defined by sales)
  • Newsletter: confirmed subscriptions (after double opt-in)
  • Contact: substantive replies (not just submissions)
  • Checkout: successful payments

Track the metric that matters, not just submissions.

Step 3: Cut fields ruthlessly

Apply the field strategy filter. For each field, answer:

  • Required to deliver value? Keep.
  • Nice to have? Move to optional or later.
  • Used for routing or qualification? Often can be inferred.

A 7-field form becomes a 3-field form. Conversion rises.

Step 4: Set up spam defense

Before launching a public form:

  • Add a honeypot field
  • Add time-based detection
  • Add rate limiting
  • Add a modern CAPTCHA if the form is high-traffic or high-spam

After launch, monitor. Tune layers based on what's actually getting through.

Step 5: Improve validation

Walk through each field:

  • Is validation specific?
  • Does it run at the right time (blur or submit, not on keystroke)?
  • Are error messages actionable?
  • Is server-side validation matching client-side?

Step 6: Verify accessibility

Critical baseline:

  • Every input has an associated label (visually visible or aria-label)
  • Errors are associated with inputs (aria-describedby, aria-invalid)
  • Focus order matches visual order
  • Color isn't the only way to indicate errors
  • Form is fully keyboard-navigable

See accessibility-audit for the full WCAG audit.

Step 7: Test downstream

Submit the form. Verify:

  • Data lands where it should
  • Required fields are populated correctly
  • Spam defenses are working (test with a script)
  • The user gets the confirmation they expect
  • Internal notification is timely

Forms break silently when downstream systems change. Test after any integration update.

Step 8: Monitor

  • Completion rate over time
  • Spam rate over time
  • Errors per submission (high errors = bad UX)
  • Drop-off field (where do people abandon?)

Failure patterns

Too many fields. Most B2B contact forms have 3x more fields than they need. Cut.

Validation that fires while typing. Annoying. Causes errors before the user has finished.

Generic error messages. "Invalid input." Where? Why? Be specific.

Required fields not marked. Users discover they're required only after submission fails. Mark required (or, for short forms, mark optional).

Autocomplete disabled. "For security." It's almost never a security improvement and always a UX cost. Leave autocomplete on.

Tab order is broken. Tab key skips fields or jumps backward. Set tabindex only when necessary; use natural DOM order.

Submit button below the fold. Especially on mobile. Users don't see it.

No save on error. User submits, has one error, returns to the form, all fields empty. Nightmare. Save the state.

Captcha as the only spam defense. Captchas are friction. Layered defense beats brute-force friction.

Captcha visible by default. Modern CAPTCHAs (Turnstile, reCAPTCHA v3) are invisible most of the time and only escalate when needed. Use those.

Newsletter signup that's actually a marketing list. Honor opt-in scope. If the user signed up for product updates, don't add them to the marketing newsletter.

Confirmation page that's a dead end. "Thanks for submitting" with no next step. What now? Provide an action (read related content, return to homepage, follow on social).

No double opt-in for marketing email. Bots and typos pollute the list. See email-deliverability for why this matters.

Email field accepting name@ as valid. Browser spec validation is loose. Validate against an actual format.

Custom date pickers worse than native. The native <input type="date"> is now good on most platforms. Don't reinvent unless you have a specific reason.

Forms that lose state on refresh. For long forms, save to localStorage and restore on load.


Output format

A form audit document includes:

  • Form inventory: every form on the site
  • Per-form review: purpose, fields, performance
  • Recommendations: field cuts, validation improvements, spam defense, design changes
  • Spam defense plan: layers per form
  • Accessibility status: WCAG compliance per form
  • Downstream integration map: where each form's data goes
  • Monitoring plan: what's tracked

If required data is unavailable

This skill's output depends on data, measurements, or tool results it cannot generate on its own. When a required input, tool, or data source is unavailable or unverifiable, the sanctioned output is the deliverable with the gap stated: what was needed, what was actually obtained or verified, and which parts of the output are affected. Fabricating, estimating, or interpolating a required number to complete the deliverable is never sanctioned. A stated gap is a complete answer.


Reference files

  • references/form-anatomy-checklist.md: A field-by-field, behavior-by-behavior checklist for auditing or designing a form, covering structure, accessibility, validation, and spam defense.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Run a comprehensive WCAG accessibility audit covering perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to audit accessibility, review WCAG compliance, fix accessibility issues, prepare for accessibility certification, address an accessibility lawsuit risk, or systematically improve a site's accessibility. Triggers on accessibility audit, WCAG audit, a11y audit, accessibility compliance, ADA compliance, screen reader test, keyboard navigation, accessibility report, fix accessibility, axe scan. Also triggers when accessibility issues have been reported and need systematic remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

How to produce ad creative that converts at performance scale. Hook patterns, format selection, video pacing, variation systems, sequential testing methodology, fatigue detection, brand-voice alignment without conversion dilution, and platform-specific creative norms. Triggers on ad creative, ad design, hook patterns, ad video pacing, creative testing, ad variations, creative refresh, creative fatigue, refresh ad creative, video ads for Meta, TikTok creative, LinkedIn ad creative, ad asset library. Also triggers when a team is producing creative at scale, planning a creative test cycle, or auditing why creative is not converting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

How to read paid media dashboards without fooling yourself. Attribution models, platform reporting quirks, multi-platform reconciliation, ROAS vs LTV horizon traps, statistical noise in performance metrics, incrementality testing, and the failure modes that produce expensive lessons. Triggers on read paid media dashboard, attribution analysis, ROAS vs LTV, multi-platform reconciliation, ad incrementality, geo holdout, conversion lift study, ghost bidding, paid media reporting, board-deck paid media metrics, blended CAC, MMM, MTA, last-click attribution. Also triggers when a marketer is about to scale, kill, or rebudget a campaign based on platform metrics, or when reconciling platform reports against warehouse revenue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement. Triggers on analytics strategy, measurement plan, event taxonomy, tracking plan, KPI framework, dashboard design, north star metric, attribution model, conversion tracking, GA4 setup, Mixpanel setup, analytics audit. Also triggers when the user has data but no clear way to use it, or wants to make decisions but doesn't know what to track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9542026年10月7日 更新

rampstackco のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する