本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ticket-authoring

Write complete, ready-to-pull work items for an issue tracker: bugs, tasks, stories, spikes, and epics, each with the fields, attachments, and done test its type requires. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write a ticket, create a Jira issue, Linear issue, or GitHub issue, file a bug report, write a user story or acceptance criteria, scope a spike, open an epic, or break work into tasks. Triggers on write a ticket, create an issue, file a bug, bug report, user story, spike, epic, task breakdown, turn this into tickets, break this down, acceptance criteria, definition of ready, ready for dev, backlog item, capitalization stage. Also triggers when the user pastes a PRD, a spec, or a bug description and asks what to do with it, even if they never say the word ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

連携ツールJiraLinearGitHub
インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md10.2 KB
  • README.md357 B
  • references/bug-template.md3.9 KB
  • references/capitalization-guide.md5.8 KB
  • references/definition-of-ready-checklist.md3.3 KB
  • references/epic-template.md2.4 KB
  • references/example-bug-and-story.md5.8 KB
  • references/spike-template.md2.3 KB
  • references/story-template.md2.8 KB
  • references/task-template.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Ticket Authoring

Turn specs, bug reports, and loose requests into work items someone can pull and start without asking a question. Tracker-agnostic: works in Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, or your tracker of choice.


When to use

  • Turning a PRD or spec into a set of tickets
  • Filing a bug that someone else will fix
  • Writing a user story with checkable acceptance criteria
  • Scoping a spike so it ends in a decision, not a shrug
  • Opening an epic with a goal, a metric, and a way to kill it
  • Auditing a backlog for tickets that are not ready to pull
  • Tagging work items with a capitalization stage for finance

When NOT to use

  • Writing the PRD or spec itself (use pm-spec-writing)
  • Deciding what ships this quarter (use roadmap-planning)
  • Running sprint ceremonies or measuring the team (use sprint-operations)
  • Writing up what went wrong after the fact (use after-action-report)
  • Handing a whole plan to a coding agent to execute unattended (use dispatch-authoring)

Required inputs

  • The source material: a spec, a bug description, a request, or a conversation
  • The ticket type, or enough context to pick one
  • The tracker's field set, if it has required custom fields
  • The parent epic or story, if one exists
  • The capitalization policy, if the team capitalizes software development

If the source is vague, ask before writing. A ticket written around a guess becomes a second ticket later.


The framework: five types, one definition of ready each

A ticket is ready when the person who pulls it can start work without a question. Each type has its own required fields, its own attachments, and its own done test. A field left blank is a question someone will ask in the middle of the sprint.

Every type shares a base: title, type, owner, parent link, labels, and capitalization stage.

Bug

A bug ticket proves the defect exists and defines how to prove it is gone.

  • Title. [area] [symptom] when [trigger]. Example: "Checkout: total shows $0.00 when a promo code is removed."
  • Repro steps. Numbered. Each step is one action. Someone who has never seen the product can follow them.
  • Environment. Build or version, browser or device, account type, data state.
  • Observed vs expected. Two separate lines. Never one sentence with "but."
  • Current test result. The test that fails today, or "no test covers this."
  • Severity and priority. Two fields. Severity is how bad the defect is. Priority is when the team fixes it.
  • Regression risk. What else touches this code path.
  • QA notes. Edge cases to check beyond the repro.
  • Fix verification method. The specific test that proves the fix, by name or by steps.
  • Expected test result after fix. What passing looks like.

Done test: the named verification passes, and the repro steps no longer reproduce.

Task

A task is a unit of build work with no direct user-facing outcome of its own.

  • Task spec: what changes, in plain language
  • Parent story link, if any
  • Touches list: files, services, flags, and tables in scope. This lets an executor scope the change and lets a reviewer spot drift.
  • Estimate
  • Screenshots of the affected area
  • QA notes
  • Definition of done

Done test: every item in the definition of done is checked, and nothing outside the touches list changed without a note.

Story

A story delivers one user-visible outcome.

  • User story statement: "As a [user], I want [action], so that [outcome]."
  • Link to the PRD or spec. If none exists, write one first with pm-spec-writing.
  • Acceptance criteria in checkable form (Given, When, Then, or a checkbox list with observable outcomes)
  • Explicit non-goals
  • Wireframe or mockup screenshots, if any
  • Analytics events to emit, with names and properties
  • Feature flag, if any
  • QA notes

Done test: every acceptance criterion is checked by someone other than the author.

Spike

A spike buys information with a fixed amount of time.

  • The question being answered, as one sentence ending in a question mark
  • Timebox, in days
  • Exit criteria: what counts as an answer
  • Resources, services, and platforms to evaluate
  • Competitor examples, if any
  • Required output artifact: a decision memo with a recommendation. Never "we looked into it."

Done test: the memo exists, names a recommendation, and lands before the timebox ends. If time runs out, the memo says what is still unknown.

Epic

An epic groups work toward one outcome and carries the business case.

  • Date opened
  • Goal, in one sentence
  • Success metric, with baseline and target
  • Kill criteria: the signal that ends the epic early
  • Owner, one name
  • Roadmap fitment: which quarter, which objective (see roadmap-planning and okr-design)
  • Notes
  • Capitalization stage, if the work is capitalizable

Done test: the success metric is measured, or the kill criteria fired and the epic closed on purpose.

Severity is not priority

Severity describes the defect. Priority describes the schedule. A typo on the pricing page is low severity and high priority. A crash in an admin screen used once a quarter is high severity and can be lower priority. Collapsing them into one field hides that tradeoff.

Capitalization stage

If the company capitalizes software development, every work item carries a stage: preliminary, application development, or post-implementation. The stage lives on the work item. It is inherited from the epic by default and overridden per ticket when the work differs. A spike inside a build epic that evaluates alternatives is preliminary. A bug fix on a shipped feature is post-implementation. See references/capitalization-guide.md. This is not accounting advice. Your finance team owns the final determination.


Workflow

  1. Read the source. Identify every distinct outcome, defect, question, and unit of build work in it.
  2. Pick the type for each. One outcome is a story. One defect is a bug. One open question is a spike. Build work under a story is a task. A group of stories toward one metric is an epic.
  3. Fill the template. Use the type's template from references. Fill every field. Write "none" when a field is truly empty, so the reader knows it was considered.
  4. Run the definition of ready. Check each ticket against its section of references/definition-of-ready-checklist.md. Fix or flag every unchecked item.
  5. Set the capitalization stage. Inherit from the epic. Override where the ticket's work differs, and note why.
  6. Link the tree. Epic to stories, stories to tasks, bugs to the story that introduced them if known.
  7. Hand off. Post to the tracker, or return the tickets as markdown ready to paste.

Failure patterns

  • Bug ticket with no repro steps. Cannot be fixed with confidence or verified. Push back until steps exist, or file it as a spike to find the repro.
  • Story with acceptance criteria that cannot be checked. "Page loads fast" is not checkable. "Page renders the first result in under 2 seconds on a mid-tier phone" is.
  • Spike with no timebox. Becomes an open-ended research project. Every spike gets days, not "until we know."
  • Epic with no kill criteria. Nobody can stop it, so it never stops.
  • Severity and priority collapsed into one field. The team loses the ability to say "bad, but not now."
  • Capitalization stage set at the epic only. Hours on preliminary spikes and post-launch bug fixes get capitalized by default. Tag the ticket.
  • Task with no touches list. The executor guesses the blast radius. Reviewers cannot tell scope from drift.
  • Ticket that restates the spec. Link the spec. Copying it means two sources that will disagree by next week.
  • "Fix verification: test it." Name the test or write the steps.

Output format

One markdown block per ticket, ready to paste into the tracker. Order: epic first, then stories, then tasks and spikes under each story, then bugs.

For a batch, return a summary table first:

#TypeTitleParentEstimateCap stageReady

Then each ticket in full. Name files tickets-[initiative].md when saving to disk.


Reference files

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Run a comprehensive WCAG accessibility audit covering perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to audit accessibility, review WCAG compliance, fix accessibility issues, prepare for accessibility certification, address an accessibility lawsuit risk, or systematically improve a site's accessibility. Triggers on accessibility audit, WCAG audit, a11y audit, accessibility compliance, ADA compliance, screen reader test, keyboard navigation, accessibility report, fix accessibility, axe scan. Also triggers when accessibility issues have been reported and need systematic remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

How to produce ad creative that converts at performance scale. Hook patterns, format selection, video pacing, variation systems, sequential testing methodology, fatigue detection, brand-voice alignment without conversion dilution, and platform-specific creative norms. Triggers on ad creative, ad design, hook patterns, ad video pacing, creative testing, ad variations, creative refresh, creative fatigue, refresh ad creative, video ads for Meta, TikTok creative, LinkedIn ad creative, ad asset library. Also triggers when a team is producing creative at scale, planning a creative test cycle, or auditing why creative is not converting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

How to read paid media dashboards without fooling yourself. Attribution models, platform reporting quirks, multi-platform reconciliation, ROAS vs LTV horizon traps, statistical noise in performance metrics, incrementality testing, and the failure modes that produce expensive lessons. Triggers on read paid media dashboard, attribution analysis, ROAS vs LTV, multi-platform reconciliation, ad incrementality, geo holdout, conversion lift study, ghost bidding, paid media reporting, board-deck paid media metrics, blended CAC, MMM, MTA, last-click attribution. Also triggers when a marketer is about to scale, kill, or rebudget a campaign based on platform metrics, or when reconciling platform reports against warehouse revenue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement. Triggers on analytics strategy, measurement plan, event taxonomy, tracking plan, KPI framework, dashboard design, north star metric, attribution model, conversion tracking, GA4 setup, Mixpanel setup, analytics audit. Also triggers when the user has data but no clear way to use it, or wants to make decisions but doesn't know what to track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rampstackco/claude-skills9762026年10月19日 更新

rampstackco のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する