本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

omh-decide

[omh] Team or business decision between options: tradeoffs, a recommendation, and a decision note you can act on. Use when the user says: strategy-brief, strategy brief, strategy memo, product strategy, strategic options, decision note, leadership strategy, next strategy.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • references/capacity-planning.md3.3 KB
  • references/decision-records.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Strategy Brief

This is a Hermes-native strategy-brief workflow skill.

Why This Exists

strategy-brief exists to keep strategy work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.

Do Not Use When

  • The strategic question is whether an early idea's customer problem and segment are real, and no validated discovery receipt exists yet; use product-discovery-validation.
  • The question is how to run a hiring process — scorecards, interview loops, candidate comparison — rather than whether to hire at all; use people-ops.
  • The user wants Jev's typed probabilities for a yes/no, pick-one, or scored question over supplied text rather than tradeoffs and a recommendation; use jev-ask.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: strategy-brief: decide whether our onboarding should prioritize solo founders or enterprise buyers.
  • Expected behavior: Frame options, tradeoffs, assumptions, rejected paths, and the decision evidence needed.
  • Why: The request is strategy-shaped and should not jump directly into implementation.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: strategy-brief: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
  • Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing strategy-brief.
  • Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.

Completion Checklist

  • The decision, options, tradeoffs, assumptions, and rejected alternatives are named.
  • Observed signals are separated from strategic inference.
  • Accepted decisions and implementation follow-ups are not conflated.

Recovery Notes

  • If evidence is mostly assumption, label it and recommend a research or feedback-triage pass.
  • If the decision owner is missing, keep the output as options rather than accepted strategy.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Research and company ops (product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, model-optimization, inference-serving, model-finetuning, research-brief, +20 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.

Use When

Use when Hermes should turn goals and evidence into options, tradeoffs, recommendations, and a decision-ready brief.

Strong routing signals: `strategy-brief`, `strategy brief`, `strategy memo`, `product strategy`, `strategic options`, `decision note`, `leadership strategy`, `next strategy`, `capacity planning`, `hire or outsource`, `outsource or hire`, `cut scope`, `headcount plan`, `demand versus capacity`, `다음 전략`, `전략 정리`, `전략 메모`, `전략 옵션`, `의사결정`, `리더십 회의`

Catalog Metadata

Category: strategy Phase: brief Hermes role: operator Quality tier: decision-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Name the decision, constraints, options, tradeoffs, and rejected alternatives.
  • Tie recommendations to observed evidence or mark them as assumptions.
  • Keep coding handoff disabled until strategy is accepted and code work is explicit.
  • When the decision is a resourcing one — hire, outsource, or cut scope — quantify demand and capacity against each other in one unit before comparing options, and price each option with the lag before it lands; a gap that exists this quarter is not closed by a hire that ramps next quarter. The worked example is omh-decide/references/capacity-planning.md.
  • Ask whether the decision deserves a durable record - hard to reverse, surprising without its context, and carrying a real trade-off; all three or no record, a decision note in chat is enough.
  • When a record is warranted, draft it per omh-decide/references/decision-records.md - the docs/adr/ convention with Context, Drivers, Considered Options, Decision, Consequences with mitigations, and Related - and stop for the user's approval before any file is written.
  • Never edit an accepted record: status moves Proposed to Accepted to Deprecated or Superseded, supersession is a new record pointing back at the old one, and a Rejected record is kept - it is what decision-recall reads later.

Handoff policy:

Keep strategy synthesis in Hermes; do not create implementation handoff until a decision is accepted and code work is explicit.

Required inputs:

  • goal
  • known evidence
  • constraints
  • decision owner

Expected outputs:

  • options
  • tradeoffs
  • recommended direction
  • decision note

Artifact expectations:

  • strategy brief or decision note when a wrapper captures it

Safety rules:

  • Do not treat a draft recommendation as an accepted decision.
  • Keep unresolved assumptions visible.
  • Separate strategy from implementation planning unless the user asks for execution.
  • A drafted decision record stays a proposal: nothing is written under docs/adr/ until the user approves the write.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: strategy-synthesis.

omh runtime record --skill strategy-brief --harness strategy-synthesis --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Onboard a new model generation or sibling into oh-my-hermes: probe router recognition, research the official contract, write trait-to-counter calibration, place routing in both lanes, price from documented list only, gate machine config on a served route, prove with the gates, close with a benchmark pair. Use when a model family ships a new generation (for example "Fable 5.1 is out", "GLM 5.4 shipped", "onboard new model", "add model to chains").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

[omh] Screen-reader or keyboard accessibility gaps: prepare WCAG, keyboard, focus, screen-reader, target-size, and reflow evidence gates for UI surfaces. Use when the user says: accessibility-audit, accessibility audit, a11y audit, a11y architect, wcag audit, wcag 2.2, wcag 2.2 aa, accessibility pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

[omh] Hermes badges unlocked and achievement progress: achievements observation: summarize hermes-achievements badges, tiers, recent unlocks, and progress from local plugin artifacts. Use when the user says: achievements, achievement, badges, badge, my badges, show achievements, achievement summary, unlocked badges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

[omh] Coordinating several agents or profiles: coordinate multiple Hermes profiles or agents with task, handoff, heartbeat, blocker, and completion states. Use when the user says: agent-board, agent board, kanban, multi-agent, multi agent, multi agent board, multiple hermes agents, multiple hermes profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

[omh] Agent is stuck, looping, or drifting: capture a stuck, looping, drifting, or repeatedly failing agent run, diagnose the likely failure pattern, and prepare the smallest safe recovery action. Use when the user says: agent-debug, agent debug, agent debugging, agent introspection, agent self-debug, self-debug, self debugging, looping agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3,3552026年10月12日 更新

rlaope のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する