Expert guide for automated and manual Web Accessibility (a11y) testing — axe-core, Pa11y, Playwright a11y, screen reader testing, and WCAG 2.2 Level AA/AAA compliance / Panduan ahli pengujian aksesibilitas web.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for AI Safety, Governance, and Responsible AI in production — Constitutional AI enforcement, runtime guardrails (NeMo Guardrails 2.0, Llama Guard 3), bias auditing, hallucination detection, EU AI Act compliance, model cards, and content provenance / Panduan ahli untuk Keamanan AI, Tata Kelola, dan AI Bertanggung Jawab di produksi.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Define constitutional rules as structured guardrails for all AI operations. Implement policies at multiple interception points: pre-generation, post-generation, and retrieval.
# NeMo Guardrails configuration example (config.yml)
models:
- type: main
engine: openai
model: gpt-4o
rails:
input:
flows:
- check_jailbreak
- check_topic_restriction
output:
flows:
- check_hallucination
- check_toxicity
instructions:
- type: general
content: |
You are a helpful, respectful, and honest assistant.
Always prioritize safety, avoid giving harmful advice, and maintain neutrality.
Implement layered defense mechanisms to intercept unsafe input and redact sensitive output. Utilize state-of-the-art moderation models such as Llama Guard 3.
// Multi-layer guardrail pipeline in TypeScript
import { LlamaGuard } from '@safety/llama-guard';
import { PIIRedactor } from '@safety/redactor';
import { LLMService } from './llm';
export async function generateSafeResponse(prompt: string): Promise<string> {
// Layer 2: Input Guardrail
const inputCheck = await LlamaGuard.checkPrompt(prompt);
if (!inputCheck.isSafe) {
throw new Error(`Unsafe prompt detected: ${inputCheck.violationCategory}`);
}
// Layer 3: Model Generation
const rawResponse = await LLMService.generate(prompt);
// Layer 4: Output Guardrails
const outputCheck = await LlamaGuard.checkResponse(prompt, rawResponse);
if (!outputCheck.isSafe) {
throw new Error('Unsafe response blocked by output guardrails.');
}
const redactedResponse = PIIRedactor.redact(rawResponse);
// Layer 5: Delivery
return redactedResponse;
}
Employ grounding techniques and retrieval-augmented verification to minimize hallucinations. Implement real-time factuality metrics on generated text.
# Hallucination detection with SelfCheckGPT principles
from selfcheckgpt.modeling_selfcheck import SelfCheckNLI
import spacy
nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
selfcheck_nli = SelfCheckNLI(device="cpu") # use cuda if available
def detect_hallucination(response_text, context_documents):
sentences = [sent.text for sent in nlp(response_text).sents]
# Calculate NLI scores against provided context
nli_scores = selfcheck_nli.predict(
sentences=sentences,
sampled_passages=[context_documents] * len(sentences)
)
threshold = 0.85
hallucinated_sentences = [
sentences[i] for i, score in enumerate(nli_scores) if score < threshold
]
return {
"is_grounded": len(hallucinated_sentences) == 0,
"hallucinations": hallucinated_sentences
}
Continuously monitor AI systems for demographic parity, equal opportunity, and equalized odds.
# Bias audit script using fairlearn
from fairlearn.metrics import demographic_parity_difference
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import pandas as pd
def audit_model_fairness(predictions, true_labels, sensitive_features):
df = pd.DataFrame({
'y_true': true_labels,
'y_pred': predictions,
'sensitive_feature': sensitive_features
})
dp_diff = demographic_parity_difference(
y_true=df['y_true'],
y_pred=df['y_pred'],
sensitive_features=df['sensitive_feature']
)
overall_accuracy = accuracy_score(df['y_true'], df['y_pred'])
print(f"Demographic Parity Difference: {dp_diff:.4f}")
print(f"Overall Accuracy: {overall_accuracy:.4f}")
if dp_diff > 0.1:
print("WARNING: Significant demographic parity violation detected.")
Maintain standardized Model Cards for transparency and accountability, automatically generated from evaluation results.
Map AI deployments against global regulatory frameworks. Implement automated risk classification checks.
# Risk classification decision tree
def classify_eu_ai_act_risk(system_purpose, employs_biometrics, affects_safety):
if system_purpose in ["social_scoring", "subliminal_manipulation"]:
return "UNACCEPTABLE_RISK"
if employs_biometrics or affects_safety or system_purpose in ["employment", "education", "credit_scoring"]:
return "HIGH_RISK"
if system_purpose in ["chatbot", "deepfake", "emotion_recognition"]:
return "LIMITED_RISK"
return "MINIMAL_RISK"
Ensure transparency in AI-generated outputs by embedding provenance data.
This skill connects to the broader ecosystem to enforce safety across all capabilities.
ai-llm-integration-expertai-prompt-engineering-expertautonomous-red-teamercompliance-gdpr-privacy-expertsession-memory-managerproduction-ready-hardenerbrainstormingzero-to-prod-orchestratorzero-to-prod-orchestratorbrainstormingまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Expert guide for automated and manual Web Accessibility (a11y) testing — axe-core, Pa11y, Playwright a11y, screen reader testing, and WCAG 2.2 Level AA/AAA compliance / Panduan ahli pengujian aksesibilitas web.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for intelligent model cascading and routing — complexity-scored task routing from Flash/Haiku to Sonnet/Opus/Astra, dynamic escalation with quality gates, 40-60% token cost reduction while maintaining output quality / Panduan ahli untuk kaskade dan routing model cerdas — routing tugas berbasis skor kompleksitas dari Flash/Haiku ke Sonnet/Opus/Astra, eskalasi dinamis dengan gerbang kualitas, pengurangan biaya token 40-60% dengan kualitas output terjaga.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for Affective Computing, emotional AI, and real-time sentiment analysis through native multimodal tokens (voice intonation and facial micro-expressions) / Panduan ahli komputasi afektif, AI emosional, dan analisis sentimen real-time melalui token multimodal native.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for AI-assisted coding workflows — agentic code generation, multi-agent code swarms, self-healing CI/CD, automated PR review, spec-to-code pipelines, codebase knowledge graphs, and human-in-the-loop approval gates / Panduan ahli untuk workflow pengkodean berbasis AI — generasi kode agentic, code swarm multi-agen, CI/CD self-healing, review PR otomatis, pipeline spec-to-code, knowledge graph codebase, dan gate persetujuan human-in-the-loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for long-term episodic memory integration (Mem0 v2, Letta/MemGPT, Zep v2), memory tier architecture, pgvector HNSW storage, and unified context management for autonomous AI agents / Panduan ahli untuk integrasi memori episodik jangka panjang (Mem0 v2, Letta/MemGPT, Zep v2), arsitektur tier memori, penyimpanan pgvector HNSW, dan manajemen konteks terpadu untuk agen AI otonom.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for designing Machine-to-Machine (M2M) micro-economies, autonomous agent wallets, and swarm budget allocation / Panduan ahli merancang ekonomi mikro antar-agen (M2M), dompet agen otonom, dan alokasi anggaran swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。