本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

docs-seeker

Find documentation for APIs, libraries, and error messages. Looks up official docs, changelog entries, and migration guides.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

docs-seeker

Purpose

Documentation lookup utility. Receives a library name, API reference, or error message, resolves the correct documentation, and returns API signatures, usage examples, and known issues. Stateless — no memory between calls.

Calls (outbound)

None — pure L3 utility using WebSearch, WebFetch, and Context7 MCP tools directly.

Called By (inbound)

  • debug (L2): lookup API docs for unclear errors
  • fix (L2): check correct API usage before applying changes
  • review (L2): verify API usage is current and correct
  • adversary (L2): verify framework/API assumptions in plan are correct

Execution

Input

target: string         — library name, API endpoint, or error message
version: string        — (optional) specific version to look up
query: string          — specific question about the target (e.g., "how to configure retry")

Step 1 — Identify Target

Parse the input to extract:

  • Library or framework name (e.g., "react-query", "fastapi", "prisma")
  • Version if specified
  • The specific API, method, or error to look up

Step 2 — Try Context7 MCP (fastest)

Attempt Context7 MCP lookup first (faster, higher quality):

  1. Call mcp__plugin_context7_context7__resolve-library-id with the library name and query
  2. Select the best matching library ID from results (prioritize: name match, source reputation, snippet count)
  3. Call mcp__plugin_context7_context7__query-docs with the resolved library ID and the specific query
  4. If Context7 returns a satisfactory answer with code examples, proceed to Step 5

Step 3 — Try llms.txt Discovery

If Context7 MCP is unavailable or insufficient, try llms.txt (AI-optimized documentation):

For GitHub repos — pattern: https://context7.com/{org}/{repo}/llms.txt

github.com/vercel/next.js    → context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt
github.com/shadcn-ui/ui      → context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt

For doc sites — pattern: https://context7.com/websites/{normalized-domain}/llms.txt

docs.imgix.com               → context7.com/websites/imgix/llms.txt
ffmpeg.org/doxygen/8.0        → context7.com/websites/ffmpeg_doxygen_8_0/llms.txt

Topic-specific — append ?topic={query} for focused results:

context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt?topic=date-picker
context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt?topic=cache

Traditional llms.txt fallback: WebSearch "[library] llms.txt" → common paths: docs.[lib].com/llms.txt, [lib].dev/llms.txt

Use WebFetch on the resolved llms.txt URL. If it contains multiple section URLs (3+), launch parallel Explorer agents (one per section, max 5).

Step 4 — Fallback to Web Search

If neither Context7 nor llms.txt available:

  1. Use WebSearch with queries:
    • "[library] [api/method] official documentation"
    • "[library] [version] [query]"
    • "[error message] [library] fix"
  2. Identify official documentation URLs (docs.*, official GitHub, npm/pypi pages)
  3. Call WebFetch on the top 1-3 official sources

Repository analysis fallback (when docs are sparse but code is available):

npx repomix --output /tmp/repomix-output.xml   # in the cloned repo

Read the repomix output to extract API patterns, usage examples, and internal documentation.

Step 5 — Extract Answer

From Context7, llms.txt, or fetched pages, extract:

  • Exact API signature with parameter types and return type
  • Minimal working code example
  • Version-specific notes (deprecated in X, changed in Y)
  • Known issues or common pitfalls mentioned in docs

Step 6 — Report

Return structured documentation in the output format below.

Constraints

  • Prefer Context7 MCP → llms.txt → WebSearch (in that priority order)
  • Only fall back to web if Context7 and llms.txt both lack coverage
  • Use ?topic= parameter on llms.txt URLs for targeted results
  • Always include source URL so callers can verify
  • If the API is deprecated, say so explicitly and link to the replacement
  • For parallel fetching: 1-3 URLs = single agent, 4-10 = 3-5 Explorer agents, 11+ = 5-7 agents

Output Format

## Documentation: [Library/API]
- **Version**: [detected or "latest"]
- **Source**: [official docs URL or "Context7"]

### API Reference
- **Signature**: `functionName(param1: Type, param2: Type): ReturnType`
- **Parameters**:
  - `param1` — description
  - `param2` — description
- **Returns**: description

### Usage Example
```[lang]
[minimal working code snippet from official docs]

Known Issues / Deprecations

  • [relevant warning, deprecation notice, or common mistake]

## Sharp Edges

Known failure modes for this skill. Check these before declaring done.

| Failure Mode | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Returning deprecated API without flagging it | HIGH | Must explicitly state "deprecated in X.Y, use Z instead" with replacement link |
| Wrong version docs returned when version specified | HIGH | Verify version match — if version-specific docs unavailable, state that explicitly |
| Skipping Context7 and going directly to web search | MEDIUM | Constraint: Context7 MCP → llms.txt → WebSearch — follow the priority chain |
| Not using ?topic= on llms.txt for focused queries | LOW | Topic parameter dramatically reduces noise — always append when query is specific |
| Returning docs without source URL | MEDIUM | Constraint: always include source URL so callers can verify |

## Done When

- Context7 attempted first (resolve-library-id + query-docs)
- If Context7 insufficient: top 1-3 official doc URLs fetched via WebFetch
- API signature extracted with parameter types and return type
- Minimal working code example included
- Deprecation/version notes included if applicable
- Source URL provided
- Documentation emitted in output format

## Returns

| Artifact | Format | Location |
|----------|--------|----------|
| API reference (signature + params) | Markdown | inline |
| Minimal working code example | Code block | inline |
| Deprecation / version notes | Markdown | inline |
| Source URL | Plain text | inline |

## Cost Profile

~300-600 tokens input, ~200-400 tokens output. Haiku. Fast lookup.

**Scope guardrail:** docs-seeker looks up documentation only — it does not apply changes, write code, or interpret whether the API fits the caller's use case.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adversary

無料

Pre-implementation red-team analysis. Use when a plan is high-risk, critical path, or expensive to reverse. Challenges plans before code is written — finds edge cases, security holes, scalability bottlenecks, error propagation risks, and integration conflicts. Catches flaws at plan time (10x cheaper than post-implementation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

Creates code-based visual assets — SVG icons, OG image HTML templates, social banners, and icon sets. Use when generating visuals as code (vector/HTML), NOT raster images — for raster generation see @rune-pro/media. Outputs files with usage instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

audit

無料

Comprehensive project audit — security, dependencies, code quality, architecture, performance, infra, docs, and mesh analytics. Use when needing a full 8-dimension health-score snapshot before a major release, M&A diligence, or quarterly review. Delegates to specialist skills (sentinel, dependency-doctor, perf, autopsy, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

autopsy

無料

Full codebase health assessment. Use when diagnosing project health or starting a rescue workflow on legacy code — OR when evaluating an external GitHub repo for dependency / fork / contribution decisions (--external mode). Analyzes complexity, dependencies, dead code, tech debt, and git hotspots. Produces a health score and rescue plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

ba

無料

Business Analyst agent. Use when starting a new feature requiring requirements elicitation BEFORE plan or cook. Asks probing questions, identifies hidden requirements, maps stakeholders, defines scope boundaries, and produces a structured Requirements Document that plan and cook consume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

Creative ideation and solution exploration. Generates multiple approaches with trade-offs, uses structured frameworks (SCAMPER, First Principles), and hands off to plan for structuring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rune-kit/rune862026年8月16日 更新

Rune-kit のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する