本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gaia-architecture-comparison

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

GAIA Architecture Comparison Skill

Compare ruflo's GAIA benchmark harness against the Princeton HAL reference implementation and other open-source harnesses to understand capability gaps and prioritize improvements.

When to use

  • Planning the next iteration of GAIA work
  • Evaluating which architectural change has the highest pass-rate ROI
  • Onboarding a new contributor to the benchmark codebase

Architecture overview

ruflo harness (current)

gaia-bench run
  └─ gaia-loader.ts      — HF dataset download + cache
  └─ gaia-agent.ts       — multi-turn Anthropic Messages loop
       └─ gaia-tools/    — web_search, file_read, web_browse,
                           image_describe, python_exec
  └─ gaia-voting.ts      — Track A self-consistency (N attempts → majority vote)
  └─ gaia-hardness/      — Track Q difficulty predictor (ADR-136)
  └─ gaia-judge.ts       — two-stage LLM-as-judge scorer

HAL reference (Princeton)

HAL uses a similar loop but with:

  • OpenAI function calling as the tool interface
  • BrowserBase / Playwright for real browser automation
  • Code interpreter sandbox (Jupyter kernel)
  • Larger token budget per turn (4096+)
  • Full 300-question evaluation set

Key differences

DimensionrufloHAL referenceGap
Question count53 (partial L1)300 (full L1)Use --limit 165 for full L1
Web searchDuckDuckGo / Google CSEBrowserBase liveAdd Playwright or Browserless
Code executionpython_exec stubReal Jupyter kernelImplement real sandbox
Image OCRimage_describe (Gemini)GPT-4V / GeminiFunctionally equivalent
File handlingfile_readFull PDF/XLSX/ZIP parserExpand file_read
Self-consistencyvoting.ts (Track A)Not in referenceruflo advantage
Hardness routingpredictor.ts (Track Q)Not in referenceruflo advantage
MemoryAgentDB HNSWNoneruflo advantage
Pass-rate L1~20.8% (iter 23)74.6% (HAL Sonnet 4.5)~54 pp gap

Gap analysis

Primary gaps (high impact)

  1. Real code execution — many L2/L3 questions require running Python to compute a numerical answer. The current python_exec tool is a stub. Implementing a real sandbox (E2B, Pyodide, or subprocess) is the single highest-ROI change.

  2. Full question set — running 53/300 L1 questions underestimates true pass-rate because the first 53 skew easier. Run --limit 165 (full L1) for a comparable HAL score.

  3. Real browser — web_browse currently fetches raw HTML. Replacing it with Playwright/Browserless for JavaScript-rendered pages would unlock many web navigation questions.

Secondary gaps (medium impact)

  1. Structured file parsing — PDF, XLSX, and ZIP attachments require dedicated parsers. file_read currently handles plain text and images only.

  2. Turn budget — 12 turns may be insufficient for complex multi-step questions. HAL uses up to 20 turns for L3.

  3. System prompt tuning — HAL's system prompt is more elaborate and explicitly instructs the model to use tools before answering.

ruflo advantages

  1. Self-consistency voting (Track A) — running N attempts per question and taking the majority answer reduces variance on borderline questions. HAL does not implement this.

  2. Hardness routing (Track Q) — routing each question to an appropriate model and turn budget based on predicted difficulty. This reduces cost on easy questions while providing more resources for hard ones.

  3. AgentDB memory — storing patterns across runs enables the agent to recall successful strategies for similar question types.

Improvement roadmap

PriorityChangeExpected LiftEffort
P0Real python_exec sandbox (E2B)+15-25 ppHigh
P0Full 165-Q L1 evaluationAccurate baselineLow
P1Playwright-based web_browse+5-10 ppMedium
P1PDF/XLSX file parser+3-8 ppMedium
P2Increase max-turns to 20 for L2/L3+2-5 ppLow
P2System prompt tuning (iter 30 research)+2-5 ppLow
P3Google Grounding via Gemini (iter 32)+3-7 ppMedium
P3Multi-provider routing (Gemini Flash for cheap Q's)Cost reductionMedium

Loading context from past research

npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory search \
  --namespace gaia-patterns \
  --query "architecture comparison HAL benchmark"

Storing comparison findings

npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory store \
  --namespace gaia-patterns \
  --key "architecture-comparison-$(date +%Y%m%d)" \
  --value "HAL gap: 54pp. Primary: python_exec stub. Secondary: browser, file parsing."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Add descriptions for new models from the HuggingFace router to chat-ui configuration. Use when new models are released on the router and need descriptions added to prod.yaml and dev.yaml. Triggers on requests like "add new model descriptions", "update models from router", "sync models", or when explicitly invoking /add-model-descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Create a new Architecture Decision Record with sequential numbering and AgentDB registration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

adr-index

無料

Build or rebuild the ADR index + dependency graph by running scripts/import.mjs (handles v3-style and plugin-style ADR formats; one Bash call vs hundreds of MCP round-trips)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Reconcile the ADR index against a DELETED ADR file or relation line by dropping and rebuilding adr-patterns + adr-edges from scratch (scripts/reindex.mjs). Use when adr-index alone leaves stale rows behind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Review code changes against accepted ADRs for compliance violations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Read back adr-patterns + adr-edges namespaces, surface dangling refs / supersede cycles / status mismatches; exit 1 on cycles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

ruvnet のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する