本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

trader-portfolio-cg

Mean-variance portfolio optimization via Conjugate Gradient — 40-60× faster than the legacy Neumann path (ADR-126 Phase 3, ADR-123 Wedge 8)

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Solve the mean-variance optimization Σ · x = μ via Conjugate Gradient instead of the legacy Neumann series.

Why CG instead of Neumann (ADR-123 Wedge 8):

  • Neumann series: ~50 µs at n=256 (legacy npx neural-trader --portfolio optimize)
  • Conjugate Gradient: ~816 ns at n=256 (this skill)
  • Measured speedup: 40-60×; parity within 1e-4 on a fixed seed.

The covariance matrix Σ is symmetric positive-definite by construction (it's a Gram matrix on real returns), so CG is provably optimal — it converges in at most n iterations with no preconditioning, and typically far fewer when eigenvalues cluster.

Disable flag: set RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG=1 to skip the CG path entirely and fall through to step 4's legacy Neumann route. Useful for A/B validation or when an upstream covariance regression breaks SPD.

Native dispatch flag: set RUFLO_SUBLINEAR_NATIVE=1 to force the adapter to attempt the native mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve path even when globalThis doesn't expose the tool (e.g. when the harness mounts it via a different transport). On any native-dispatch failure the adapter cleanly falls back to the local JS CG and records method: 'cg-local' in the artifact metadata — so the regression is auditable.

Steps:

  1. Ensure neural-trader is available:

    npm ls neural-trader 2>/dev/null || npm install --ignore-scripts neural-trader
    
  2. Read the current covariance matrix Σ and expected-return vector μ from neural-trader's portfolio API:

    # neural-trader 2.8.11 does NOT return Σ or μ: `--portfolio current` runs the equal-weight demo
    # (symbols, weights, a risk figure and a note that the returns matrix is not wired).
    # Take Σ and μ from the user (a returns matrix they provide), or from AgentDB if a prior run stored them:
    
    mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search({ query: "covariance matrix current", namespace: "trading-risk", limit: 1 })
    

    The skill expects the response to include covariance: number[][] (n × n) and expectedReturns: number[] (length n).

  3. Solve Σ · x = μ via the SublinearAdapter (preferred path) when RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG is unset:

    import { sublinearAdapter } from '../../src/sublinear-adapter.mjs';
    const result = await sublinearAdapter.solveCG(COVARIANCE, EXPECTED_RETURNS, {
      tolerance: 1e-6,
      maxIterations: 200,
    });
    // result.solution    — optimal weights (number[])
    // result.iterations  — CG iterations executed
    // result.residual    — final ||A·x − b||₂
    // result.latencyMs   — wall-clock latency
    // result.method      — 'cg-sublinear-native' | 'cg-local'   <-- READ THIS
    // result.solver      — 'sublinear-time-solver@1.7.0' | 'local-js-cg'
    // result.degraded    — true if input failed SPD checks (fall back to step 4)
    

    The adapter does the dispatch itself: it probes for mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve on globalThis (and honours RUFLO_SUBLINEAR_NATIVE=1 as a manual override), routes through the native kernel when reachable, and falls back transparently to the embedded ~50-LOC JS CG when not. The math is identical either way — CG, dense form, n × n SPD covariance. The operator reads result.method to know which backend produced the artifact.

    The native MCP tool's wire shape (for direct callers who want to bypass the adapter):

    mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve({
      matrix: COVARIANCE,
      rhs: EXPECTED_RETURNS,
      algorithm: "cg",
      tolerance: 1e-6,
      maxIterations: 200
    })
    

    Output:

    { solution: number[], iterations: number, residual: number }
    
  4. Fallback (legacy Neumann) — if step 3 reports degraded: true (non-SPD input, non-square matrix, MCP error) OR if RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG=1:

    npx neural-trader --portfolio optimize
    

    Capture the weights output and tag the artifact metadata with method: 'neumann-fallback' and a reason field.

  5. Store the optimal weights to trading-risk namespace with full provenance metadata. Take method and solver straight from the adapter's result so the operator can verify which backend ran:

    mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store({
      key: "portfolio-weights-PORTFOLIO_ID-TIMESTAMP",
      namespace: "trading-risk",
      value: JSON.stringify({
        weights: result.solution,           // number[] from step 3 (or weights from step 4 fallback)
        method: result.method,              // 'cg-sublinear-native' | 'cg-local' | 'neumann-fallback'
        solver: result.solver,              // 'sublinear-time-solver@1.7.0' | 'local-js-cg' | 'neural-trader-cli'
        iterations: result.iterations,
        residual: result.residual,
        latencyMs: result.latencyMs,
        capturedAt: NEW_DATE_ISO,
        reason: FALLBACK_REASON || null
      })
    })
    

    The trading-risk namespace is canonical (ADR-126 Phase 1; the five-namespace alignment). Long-lived — no TTL — because portfolio weights are the audit trail Phase 4 will Ed25519-sign.

  6. Cross-check against historical patterns (optional but recommended):

    mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_pattern-search({
      query: "portfolio weights Sharpe regime:CURRENT_REGIME",
      namespace: "trading-risk"
    })
    

    If the new weights differ by more than 30% in any single asset from the historical median, flag for human review before applying. This is a guard-rail, not a hard block.

Acceptance criteria (ADR-126 Phase 3):

  • Latency < 1 ms on n = 256 covariance (local JS CG); native path target 40-60× faster (816 ns native vs 50 µs Neumann per sublinear-time-solver@1.7.0).
  • Parity with legacy Neumann within ||cg − neumann||_∞ < 1e-4 on a fixed seed.
  • Fallback path engages cleanly when native MCP unavailable / covariance non-SPD.
  • Artifact metadata distinguishes cg-sublinear-native, cg-local, and neumann-fallback.

Refs:

  • ADR-126 Phase 3 (this skill's authoring ADR)
  • ADR-123 §162 Row 8 (Wedge 8 speedup claim)
  • ADR-123 §262-289 (the SublinearAdapter contract)
  • plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/sublinear-adapter.ts (the adapter)
  • plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/benchmarks/portfolio-cg.bench.ts (the measured numbers)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Add descriptions for new models from the HuggingFace router to chat-ui configuration. Use when new models are released on the router and need descriptions added to prod.yaml and dev.yaml. Triggers on requests like "add new model descriptions", "update models from router", "sync models", or when explicitly invoking /add-model-descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Create a new Architecture Decision Record with sequential numbering and AgentDB registration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

adr-index

無料

Build or rebuild the ADR index + dependency graph by running scripts/import.mjs (handles v3-style and plugin-style ADR formats; one Bash call vs hundreds of MCP round-trips)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Reconcile the ADR index against a DELETED ADR file or relation line by dropping and rebuilding adr-patterns + adr-edges from scratch (scripts/reindex.mjs). Use when adr-index alone leaves stale rows behind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Review code changes against accepted ADRs for compliance violations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Read back adr-patterns + adr-edges namespaces, surface dangling refs / supersede cycles / status mismatches; exit 1 on cycles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/ruflo7.4万2026年10月13日 更新

ruvnet のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する