Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-backed SEO keyword insights and strategy using SandBase-managed search, keyword, site-analysis, and SERP capabilities. Use when asked to discover or prioritize keywords, assess search demand or ranking feasibility, map intent and topics, find competitor gaps, plan organic-search landing pages or content, or analyze a website's SEO opportunities.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Build a decision-ready organic-search strategy from a site, product, seed topic, or competitor set. This Skill is a SandBase API workflow: it calls the named SEO capabilities in the SandBase API map through the SandBase MCP gateway. Use an authorized SandBase MCP connection and the discover → inspect → run workflow below; never request, print, or store an API key in the research output.
The primary capability is DataForSEO keyword search through SandBase: discover candidates, validate demand and difficulty, compare site visibility, and inspect live SERPs. Read example workflows when the user needs a starting prompt or wants to understand the output.
Collect or infer the target site or product, target market, language, conversion goal, audience, content scope, and competitors. Classify the request as one or more of: discovery, site opportunity, competitor gap, content roadmap, or page keyword map.
If a site is supplied, form a compact site brief before researching: category, offer, ICP, jobs-to-be-done, differentiators, conversion action, current content themes, and exclusions. Inspect the homepage and a small set of representative product, use-case, pricing, docs, and content pages. Use a SandBase site/content capability when available; use SandBase web search only as a fallback. Record inaccessible or JavaScript-heavy pages as evidence gaps.
When market details are missing, choose a defensible default only if the site or request makes one clear; otherwise ask for the market. Never merge metrics from different markets or engines without labels.
Read the SandBase API map before selecting tools. Treat each listed tool_name as a capability identifier to resolve through the SandBase gateway:
sandbase_discover with the provider and capability to find the current endpoint name.name to sandbase_inspect; read inputSchema, pricing, and execute_as.execute_as to call sandbase_run using execute_as.arguments.name and schema-defined arguments. If it returns a run_id, poll sandbase_run_get within the task budget until completed or failed; report pending or failed runs without automatically resubmitting them.Use the API map to select the intended SEO capability and sandbase_discover to resolve its current name. If it is unavailable, search for a relevant alternative and verify it with sandbase_inspect before running it.
Prefer this evidence ladder:
The API map intentionally fixes the product-facing capability names, while sandbase_inspect remains authoritative for payload shape, supported locations, and optional parameters. If an expected capability is unavailable, identify the evidence gap and continue only with evidence that is available.
Create 3–10 justified seed themes from the site brief or product description: category, capability, use case, pain point, buyer role, integration, comparison, and transactional or informational modifiers. Keep brand terms separate unless brand SEO is explicitly in scope.
Expand a small number of diverse seeds first, then deduplicate and remove clearly irrelevant, unsafe, navigational, or off-market terms. Preserve the provenance of each candidate: site, seed, suggestion, related, competitor, SERP, or hypothesis.
Validate the promising candidates with the available SandBase capabilities. Keep search volume, difficulty, CPC, trend, clickstream, rank, and SERP features in their original market and source context. Mark unavailable metrics as unavailable; never estimate them.
For competitor work, distinguish:
Do not call every available provider merely because it exists. Stop expanding once clusters have enough evidence to make a decision; expand again only for thin or ambiguous clusters.
Use the keyword capabilities deliberately:
keyword_suggestions, keyword_ideas, related_keywords, or Google Ads seed expansion.search_volume, historical volume, Google Trends, and bulk difficulty only after shortlisting candidates.keywords_for_site and ranked_keywords to distinguish existing coverage from true gaps.competitors_domain, domain_intersection, and serp_competitors only for a justified competitor comparison.Cluster validated candidates by user problem and shared ranking intent, then label each cluster with funnel stage and the best page purpose. Use live SERPs to verify whether the query rewards a product page, feature page, comparison, integration page, programmatic template, documentation, category page, or editorial content.
Score at cluster level before scoring individual keywords. Use a transparent qualitative scorecard:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Qualified demand | Is the audience and demand meaningful for the business? |
| Commercial fit | Can the offer or a conversion path serve this query well? |
| Feasibility | Do difficulty, incumbent quality, topical authority, and SERP shape make entry plausible? |
| Strategic leverage | Does winning support positioning, product adoption, or a reusable page family? |
| Evidence confidence | Are the market, metrics, and SERP evidence sufficiently complete? |
Explain the reasoning behind each priority. Do not use a universal volume or difficulty cutoff: an opportunity's threshold depends on the market, query intent, business value, and the target's authority. If the user supplies a threshold, honor it and show which candidates meet it.
Return a concise report using the report template for full deliverables. Separate observed data, calculated prioritization, and strategic judgment. Include assumptions, market labels, sources/capabilities used, data gaps, and next validation actions.
For every recommended page, specify its target cluster, primary query, supporting queries, intent, proposed page type, angle, conversion path, and SERP evidence. Recommend updates to an existing page when that is stronger than creating a new URL. Flag potential cannibalization between pages targeting the same intent.
example.com in the United States. Prioritize commercial intent and show the evidence behind every recommendation.”AI agent observability into keyword clusters, then validate volume, difficulty, trends, and the Google SERP for the top cluster.”our-domain.com with competitor-a.com and competitor-b.com. Separate coverage gaps from performance gaps and recommend the next three pages.”CRM software in Germany. Keep Germany/German metrics separate from any English-language research.”Before delivering, verify that:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research emerging academic trends by combining scholarly databases, web sources, and news to identify rising research areas, breakthrough papers, and shifting scientific consensus. Ideal for R&D teams tracking frontier science.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, implement, or review accessibility review work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on accessibility review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, implement, or review agentic eval work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests agentic eval work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or review ai seo deliverables with audience, evidence, voice, and conversion-quality controls. Use when the user explicitly asks for ai seo work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply airflow dag patterns in reproducible local data workflows with version-aware APIs, explicit assumptions, and validation. Use when the user chooses airflow dag patterns or its strengths fit the task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。