本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

advisor

Consult an independent, read-only GPT-6 Astra advisor before committing to a substantive interpretation, approach, or final result. Not for routine work, implementation, or file edits. Uses gpt-6-astra at an effort matched to the question.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml306 B
  • assets/architecture.svg3.3 KB
  • scripts/sol-advisor.sh4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Advisor (GPT-6 Astra)

This is the Codex-native advisor maintained in this library. It is a single-turn, independent, read-only consult — not delegated implementation and not a substitute for the lead's judgment.

<p align="center"><img src="assets/architecture.svg" alt="Codex advisor: the solver (any Codex lead) sends a self-contained briefing to an Astra advisor at an effort chosen for the question; the advisor returns one decisive read-only review" width="900"></p>

Use a new output path or directory for each run; preserve earlier results and existing user edits.

Choose the effort

The advisor is gpt-6-astra. Pick its effort per consult from the difficulty and stakes of the question, and tell the user the level and reason in one line:

EffortUse for
high (default)a completion check, a bounded question with a checkable answer, a sanity read before writing
xhighan interpretation or design decision, stuck or non-converging work, a change of approach
maxrare: high-stakes and hard to verify, where a stronger read is worth the latency

OpenAI advises xhigh only where it clearly pays for its latency and cost, so high is the default. Astra does not support none. A fresh Astra session is a separate review context, not an independent model family when the caller also runs Astra.

Luna is not an advisor tier. It is appropriate only for tightly specified mechanical work with objective acceptance checks, not for judgment or synthesis.

When to consult

  • Before committing to a substantive interpretation, writing/analysis strategy, or change of approach.
  • When stuck: repeated errors, a non-converging approach, or results that do not fit.
  • Before declaring a multi-step task complete, after the deliverable is durable.
  • Before high-impact decisions that are hard to verify cheaply.

Do not consult for simple orientation or routine, cheaply verifiable work. On longer work, use one focused consultation before committing to the approach and one before final sign-off when the residual risk warrants it.

Sandbox constraint

scripts/sol-advisor.sh keeps its legacy filename for existing callers and defaults to Astra. Nested CLI calls depend on the parent sandbox, network access, and authentication; headless execution or approval never alone does not rule them out. Use the session's authorized permissions. If a restricted parent blocks initialization, the child cannot bypass it. Request escalation only when supported and necessary; otherwise report the missing independent consult and continue the authorized work without claiming it was reviewed.

Run a consult

  1. Write a self-contained briefing: task, key evidence and paths, current approach or claim, alternatives considered, exact question, and any irreversible or high-impact consequences. The advisor has no access to the original conversation.

  2. Make any deliverable durable before a completion review.

  3. Run the consult at the effort you chose:

    scripts/sol-advisor.sh --prompt-file <briefing-path> --out <output-path> -C "$PWD" --effort <high|xhigh|max>
    
  4. Read the output, verify factual claims where possible, and record why you follow or decline any material recommendation.

Codex-plugin result-handling guidance (stop after presenting review findings) applies to code-review handoffs, not here: this skill's contract is that the caller reads the advice, weighs it against primary evidence, and acts — presenting the advisor's text and stopping is not a completed consult.

The spawned session is --sandbox read-only and --ephemeral; it must not edit files. scripts/sol-advisor.sh --check verifies that the Codex CLI is available.

Decision rules

  • Ask one decision-focused question per consult; do not turn the advisor into an unbounded co-worker.
  • Treat advice as evidence, not authority. Primary evidence and direct checks outrank confidence or rhetoric.
  • If the advisor identifies an unresolved material conflict, run one focused follow-up consult rather than broadening the first prompt.
  • If the advisor's recommendation conflicts with authoritative evidence, state the conflict and follow the evidence.
  • If high-impact uncertainty remains after a consult, stop and ask the human rather than manufacturing certainty.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

advisor

無料

Consults Fable as an independent, read-only reviewer at an effort the caller matches to the question. The calling session (usually Opus, or Haiku) holds the task and escalates one decision point. Use before committing to an interpretation or a substantial piece of writing or analysis, when stuck or not converging, when changing approach, or as a final check on a finished task. Fallback for when the native advisor tool is unavailable. Not for a session already running Fable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

beamer

無料

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer slide decks (lectures, seminars, talks), drawn from the author's own Overleaf edits and published slide-design guidance. Covers storyboarding, frame titles, slide prose, word and frame budgets, layout without overfull boxes, XeLaTeX fonts and Korean (xeCJK), color, figures and screenshots, Overleaf source hygiene, speaker notes, and a build-and-QA loop with a contact sheet. Use when writing, editing, reviewing, or building a Beamer deck, theme, or storyboard. A course skill supplies course facts and the frame skeleton; this skill supplies the craft. Not for HTML or PowerPoint decks, posters, or papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

beamer

無料

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer decks (storyboarding, slide prose, frame budgets, layout, XeLaTeX and Korean fonts, color, figures, Overleaf hygiene, build QA). Use to write, edit, review, or build a Beamer deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

Audit a manuscript's citations for fabricated sources, DOIs that resolve to the wrong work, in-text and reference-list mismatches, style, and claim support, verified against Crossref and OpenAlex. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

Audits a manuscript's citations for fabricated or nonexistent sources, DOIs that resolve to a different work, mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list, APA 7 or journal style, and whether each source supports the claim it is attached to. Checks entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, and DataCite and labels anything it could not verify NOT CHECKED. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs, or when a source may be AI-invented. Figures and tables go to figure-table-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into analysis-ready long-format data: implementation identification, reshaping, choice-profile alignment, reference categories, and pilot exclusion. Use when a conjoint CSV needs cleaning, reshaping, or debugging before AMCE estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

scdenney/open-science-skills652026年10月8日 更新

scdenney のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する