本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

lead-scoring

Score and prioritize leads based on firmographic fit and behavioral engagement signals, producing ranked tiers for sales team focus. Use when the user requests lead scoring or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Lead Scoring

Score and prioritize inbound and outbound leads by combining firmographic fit (how closely a lead matches your ideal customer profile) with behavioral engagement signals (actions that indicate purchase intent). This skill builds scoring rubrics, assigns weighted points, calculates composite scores, and segments leads into actionable tiers — Hot, Warm, and Cold — so sales teams focus time on the highest-converting opportunities.

Workflow

  1. Define ICP Criteria — Establish the firmographic attributes of your ideal customer: target industries, company size ranges, revenue bands, geographic regions, and technology stack indicators. Each attribute gets a weight reflecting its predictive importance based on historical conversion data.

  2. Assign Fit Scores — Score each lead's company against ICP criteria. A perfect-fit lead earns maximum fit points; partial matches earn proportional scores. Negative scoring applies for explicit disqualifiers (e.g., company size below minimum threshold, industries you don't serve, students or competitors).

  3. Track Engagement Signals — Capture behavioral signals from marketing automation, CRM, and product analytics: email opens/clicks, website page visits (especially pricing and case study pages), content downloads, webinar attendance, demo requests, free trial signups, and reply sentiment. Weight each signal by its correlation to closed-won deals.

  4. Calculate Composite Score — Combine fit score (typically 0–50 points) and engagement score (typically 0–50 points) into a composite score (0–100). Apply decay to engagement signals older than 30 days to ensure the score reflects current intent, not stale activity.

  5. Rank and Segment into Tiers — Sort leads by composite score and assign tiers: Hot (75–100), Warm (40–74), Cold (0–39). Route Hot leads to SDRs for immediate outreach, Warm leads to nurture sequences, and Cold leads to low-touch automated campaigns. Review tier thresholds quarterly against actual conversion rates and adjust.

Usage

Provide your ICP definition, the engagement signals you track, and a list of leads with their attributes. The skill outputs a scoring rubric and scored/ranked lead list.

Example prompt:

Build a lead scoring model for our B2B analytics platform. ICP: Series A+ SaaS companies, 50–500 employees, US/Canada, using Snowflake or BigQuery. Score these 5 leads and assign Hot/Warm/Cold tiers.

Examples

Example 1: Building a Lead Scoring Rubric

Input: B2B analytics platform targeting mid-market SaaS companies.

Fit Scoring Rubric (0–50 points):

CriterionWeightScoring Rules
Company size15 pts200–500 emp: 15 · 50–199 emp: 10 · 501–1000 emp: 5 · <50 or >1000: 0
Industry10 ptsSaaS/Software: 10 · Fintech/E-commerce: 7 · Other tech: 4 · Non-tech: 0
Funding stage10 ptsSeries A–C: 10 · Seed: 5 · Public/Pre-seed: 2
Geography5 ptsUS/Canada: 5 · UK/EU: 3 · Other: 1
Tech stack10 ptsSnowflake or BigQuery: 10 · Redshift: 6 · No cloud DW: 0

Engagement Scoring Rubric (0–50 points):

SignalPointsDecay
Demo requested20 ptsNone (one-time event)
Pricing page visit8 ptsHalved after 14 days
Case study download6 ptsHalved after 21 days
Email link clicked3 pts (per click, max 12)Halved after 14 days
Webinar attended7 ptsHalved after 30 days
Blog visit1 pt (per visit, max 5)Expires after 30 days

Tier Thresholds:

TierScore RangeAction
Hot75–100Immediate SDR outreach within 4 hours
Warm40–74Enroll in high-touch nurture sequence
Cold0–39Low-touch automated drip campaign

Example 2: Scoring a Batch of Leads

Input: 5 leads with attributes and recent activity.

Scored Output:

LeadCompanyEmployeesIndustryFundingTech StackFit ScoreKey EngagementEng. ScoreTotalTier
Rachel M.StreamOps320SaaSSeries BSnowflake50Demo request + pricing visit + 2 email clicks3484🔥 Hot
David K.PayFlow180FintechSeries ABigQuery37Webinar + case study download + 3 email clicks2259🟡 Warm
Priya S.HealthBridge90HealthcareSeries BRedshift21Pricing page visit + 1 email click1132🔵 Cold
Marcus T.DevLayer450SaaSSeries CSnowflake504 blog visits + 1 email click858🟡 Warm
Lisa C.TinyML Labs30AI/MLSeedBigQuery20Demo request + webinar2747🟡 Warm

Summary: 1 Hot lead (route to SDR), 3 Warm leads (nurture sequence), 1 Cold lead (automated drip). Marcus T. has a perfect fit score but low engagement — prioritize getting him to a demo.

Best Practices

  • Weight your scoring model on historical closed-won data, not intuition — run a correlation analysis between lead attributes and conversion to calibrate point values.
  • Apply score decay to engagement signals so that a lead who was active 6 months ago doesn't rank above a lead showing intent today.
  • Include negative scoring for explicit disqualifiers (competitors, students, non-target geographies) to keep noise out of the Hot tier.
  • Review and recalibrate tier thresholds quarterly; as your ICP evolves and marketing channels shift, static thresholds drift from reality.
  • Separate fit and engagement scores in your reporting so reps can distinguish "great company, not engaged yet" from "engaged lead at a poor-fit company."
  • Set a minimum fit score threshold (e.g., 15 points) below which no amount of engagement can push a lead to Hot — this prevents poor-fit leads from wasting SDR time.

Edge Cases

  • High engagement, zero fit — A lead who downloads every resource but works at a 5-person agency outside your ICP. Cap their maximum tier at Warm regardless of engagement score to avoid wasting sales cycles.
  • Perfect fit, no engagement — A lead matching ICP criteria exactly but showing no behavioral signals. Flag for outbound prospecting rather than inbound follow-up; they may not know you exist yet.
  • Duplicate leads from the same company — When multiple contacts at one company score independently, consolidate into an account-level score to avoid double-counting the same buying intent.
  • Engagement signal spam — A lead who opens every email and visits every page may be a researcher, bot, or competitor. Set engagement score caps per signal type and flag anomalous activity patterns for manual review.
  • Scoring model cold-start — For new products or markets without historical conversion data, start with a simple unweighted model, collect 90 days of pipeline data, then recalibrate weights based on actual outcomes.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

Design reproducible evaluations for AI agents with representative task sets, explicit rubrics, appropriate graders, baselines, regression gates, and failure analysis. Use when defining agent quality, comparing prompts or models, validating a release, measuring tool-use reliability, investigating regressions, or deciding whether an agent is ready for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

Generate comprehensive marketing analytics reports by collecting KPIs, analyzing trends, and delivering actionable insights with attribution modeling and funnel analysis. Use when the user requests analytics reporting or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

Design RESTful APIs with proper resource modeling, HTTP method semantics, status codes, pagination, versioning, and documentation. Use when the user requests api design or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2112026年8月10日 更新

seb1n のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する