本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

attack-chain-web3

Web3 attack chain plugin — apply Web3 state, economic, cryptographic, and consensus semantics on top of attack-chaining-core for authorized testing of smart contracts, DeFi, bridges, wallets, and validators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagenticスター 92(GitHub 92 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB
  • references/economic-checklist.md526 B
  • references/web3-chain-matrix.md1.1 KB
  • templates/web3-extension.yaml734 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Web3 Attack Chain Plugin

Purpose

Apply Web3-specific state, economic, cryptographic, and consensus semantics on top of attack-chaining-core for authorized testing of smart contracts, DeFi protocols, bridges, wallets, validators, and distributed systems.

Use local forks, testnets, simulators, or private clusters. Do not move real user assets or disrupt public networks.

Web3 chain families

  • temporary liquidity -> state/price influence -> value extraction;
  • oracle input/control -> incorrect valuation -> borrow/liquidation/accounting impact;
  • callback/reentrancy -> intermediate-state reuse -> invariant violation;
  • rounding/precision/accounting drift -> repeated amplification -> asset imbalance;
  • signature/domain/replay weakness -> unauthorized message acceptance -> state transition;
  • governance weight acquisition -> proposal/control action -> treasury or parameter impact;
  • bridge message/proof validation weakness -> unauthorized mint/release;
  • wallet/session/approval weakness -> signer authority abuse -> asset movement;
  • transaction ordering/MEV -> state-dependent operation -> economic extraction;
  • validator/message scheduling -> state divergence or liveness failure;
  • snapshot/restart/replay inconsistency -> persistent state corruption or consensus impact.

Mandatory Web3 state model

For every step record:

  • chain/network and block/slot/epoch context;
  • contract/program/component and exact version;
  • pre-state and post-state;
  • caller/signer authority;
  • balances, shares, debt, collateral, reserves, and supply affected;
  • oracle values, timestamps, confidence/deviation bounds;
  • transaction atomicity and ordering;
  • finality/reorg assumptions;
  • economic capital required and recoverable;
  • fees, slippage, liquidity, and profitability where relevant.

Composition rules

Atomic chains

For flash-loan or single-transaction chains, every step must succeed under transaction atomicity. A state that disappears on revert cannot satisfy a later step.

Multi-transaction chains

Prove persistence between transactions, front-running exposure, required approvals, timing windows, and whether defenders/arbitrageurs can restore state.

Oracle chains

Separate ability to trade an asset from ability to move the protocol's consumed oracle. Validate source, aggregation, update cadence, TWAP window, liquidity depth, deviation checks, stale-price handling, and downstream use.

Governance chains

Separate temporary token ownership from voting power. Check snapshots, delegation, quorum, proposal delay, timelock, veto/guardian controls, execution permissions, and capital lock duration.

Bridge chains

Trace the complete trust path:

source event/state -> relayer/validator observation -> proof/signature verification -> replay/domain checks -> destination execution

A bug in one component matters only if it creates an accepted destination transition.

Signature and replay chains

Check signer authority, domain separator, chain ID, contract/program address, nonce, expiry, message encoding, malleability, and replay storage. A valid signature for another context is not automatically reusable.

Validator and consensus chains

Classify schedules as attacker-forced, attacker-biased, network-possible, harness-only, or protocol-illegal. Distinguish task/process/node crash from quorum loss or network halt. Prove legal message sequences and persistence through replay, fork choice, reconciliation, restart, and finality.

Economic impact discipline

Do not equate temporary accounting deviation with extractable loss. Calculate:

  • attacker capital at risk;
  • maximum executable size under liquidity;
  • fees and slippage;
  • liquidation/arbitrage response;
  • per-block/per-epoch limits;
  • recoverable versus irreversible loss;
  • protocol bad debt or locked assets;
  • whether the chain is profitable, griefing-only, or safety/liveness impact.

Severity follows demonstrated loss/control/safety impact, not theoretical TVL.

Web3 chain blockers

Search for:

  • checks-effects-interactions or reentrancy guards;
  • invariant checks after callbacks;
  • transaction revert/atomicity;
  • oracle TWAP/deviation/staleness limits;
  • caps, pauses, guardians, timelocks;
  • signature domain separation and nonces;
  • replay protection;
  • proof finality and confirmation thresholds;
  • quorum and Byzantine fault assumptions;
  • slashing/economic cost;
  • fork-choice reconciliation;
  • liquidity depth and price recovery;
  • privilege already equivalent to claimed impact.

Required output additions

Include:

  • transaction/state timeline;
  • balance and invariant deltas;
  • signer/caller table;
  • oracle and liquidity assumptions;
  • atomicity/finality analysis;
  • economic feasibility estimate;
  • validator/consensus schedule classification when applicable;
  • safe verifier plan on a fork/testnet/private cluster.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

Web2 attack chain plugin — apply Web2 trust boundaries and composition rules on top of attack-chaining-core for authorized testing of web apps, APIs, identity, cloud, and internal services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

Domain-neutral attack chain analysis — determine whether independently identified security primitives compose into a realistic, authorized, evidence-backed attack path with greater impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

Build an evidence-backed map of externally and internally reachable attack surfaces, trust boundaries, privileged transitions, security assets, and high-value audit targets before vulnerability hunting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

THE master bug bounty hunting skill — hasil merge arsenal 69 skill (bughunter-os, webhunter-os, open-kritt, ghost-scan, dll) + SYADAGENTIC-bugbounty v7.1 + submission review gate. Full-spectrum: recon, attack-surface mapping, bug discovery (Web/API, smart contract, crypto, infra), exploit dev, adversarial triage, evidence packaging, and submission. HARD FLOW: policy first, full recon pass, verify everything, hub before operator report, bug-bounty-submission-review gate before ANY submit, wait for operator "gas" before platform POST. Timer triggered whenever SYADAGENTIC is bug hunting or auditing anything. Includes 13 sub-skills, 28 commands, 10 agents, 51 tools, MCP servers, wordlists, tons of references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sekolah76/syadagentic922026年8月27日 更新

Sekolah76 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する