本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

seo-page

URL-level SEO intelligence — which keywords this page ranks for, traffic captured, position history, SERP context, and AI Search citation status. Produces a keep / refresh / consolidate / kill verdict for one page. Distinct from `seo-technical-audit` (which checks technical health, not keyword/traffic performance) and from `seo-content-brief` (which produces a NEW article from a topic). Use when the user asks "analyze this page", "page SEO performance", "what does this URL rank for", "page traffic", "should I refresh this page", or provides a single URL for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skillsスター 188(GitHub 188 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md14.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Example output: examples/seo-page-notion-keyboard-shortcuts-20260514/PAGE.md

Page Intelligence

Show what a single URL ranks for, what traffic it captures, where its weak and strong points are, and what to do about it. The deliverable is an opinionated verdict — KEEP, REFRESH, CONSOLIDATE, or KILL — anchored in objective signals from SE Ranking's URL-level data.

Prerequisites

  • SE Ranking MCP server connected.
  • Claude's WebFetch tool available (for the page-level HTML sense-check).
  • User provides: (a) a target URL, optionally (b) target market country (default: us), (c) primary topical keyword (auto-inferred from <title> + <h1> if not supplied).

Process

  1. Validate target & preflight. See skills/seo-firecrawl/references/preflight.md for the canonical 3-stage preflight (credit balance, Firecrawl availability, Google APIs). Skill-specific notes:

    • Confirm the URL is fetchable; derive parent domain. If the user supplied a primary keyword, use it; otherwise infer it in step 3.
    • Estimated SE Ranking cost for this skill: ~10–15 credits typical (URL overview, ranking keywords, page authority, SERP context for top 3–5 keywords).
    • Firecrawl: optional with WebFetch fallback, ~1 Firecrawl credit if available. When available, step 6 recovers og:*, twitter:*, canonical, robots meta, JSON-LD types, and hreflang count from raw <head> — WebFetch returns markdown only and strips those fields. Without Firecrawl, the affected lines in PAGE.md emit (skipped — Firecrawl not installed). Pass --no-firecrawl to treat Firecrawl as unavailable even when installed (credit conservation).
    • Google APIs: tier 1 (GSC available) unlocks step 4b (GSC URL performance + URL Inspection) after the page-authority step. See skills/seo-google/references/cross-skill-integration.md § "seo-page" for the full recipe.
  2. URL-level overview DATA_getUrlOverviewWorldwide

    • Pull keyword count, organic traffic estimate, paid keyword count, paid traffic estimate, top regions.
    • Note: traffic estimates are directional — they don't replace Google Search Console.
  3. Ranking keywords DATA_getDomainKeywords (use the url param for exact match — not filter_url)

    • Pull every keyword the URL ranks for in the target country, with positions.
    • Sort by traffic-weighted score: volume × CTR-by-position (use a standard CTR curve: 1=28%, 2=15%, 3=11%, 4=8%, 5=7%, 6=5%, 7=4%, 8=3%, 9=2%, 10=2%, 11+=1%).
    • Take the top 3–5 as the URL's "primary keywords" for SERP work in step 5.
  4. Page authority DATA_getPageAuthority + DATA_getPageAuthorityHistory

    • Current PA score and its 12-month trajectory.
    • Flag any drop > 5 points in the last 90 days.

4b. GSC URL performance + URL Inspection (only if google-api.json is present, tier ≥ 1)

  • Replaces the directional traffic estimate from step 2 with first-party Google data for the exact URL.
  • Pull GSC search analytics for the URL (last 28 days, by query and page): python3 scripts/gsc_query.py --property "{config.default_property}" --url "{target_url}" --days 28 --json
  • Pull URL Inspection (real indexation status, canonical Google sees, last crawl date): python3 scripts/gsc_inspect.py "{target_url}" --site-url "{config.default_property}" --json
  • If the URL's domain isn't a verified GSC property: surface "GSC: {target_domain} not verified — add it in Search Console" and continue with SE Ranking data only.
  • Surface in PAGE.md "## Snapshot": GSC last 28d: {clicks}/{impressions}/{ctr}% CTR / pos {position} and Google sees: {INDEXED|EXCLUDED} · canonical {userCanonical} → {googleCanonical} · last crawled {date}.
  • Feed into the verdict heuristic: INDEXED + impressions > 100 + position 4–10 → harden REFRESH (clear quick-win). EXCLUDED (any reason) → harden KILL or CONSOLIDATE. userCanonical ≠ googleCanonical → flag as critical issue regardless of verdict.
  • See skills/seo-google/references/cross-skill-integration.md § "seo-page" for the full recipe.
  1. SERP context DATA_getSerpResults and DATA_getAiOverview

    • For each of the 3–5 primary keywords:
      • Top 10 organic results (URL, title, snippet).
      • SERP features present (PAA, image carousel, video, shopping, etc.).
      • AIO presence and citations — is this URL cited in the AIO?
  2. HTML sense-check WebFetch (always) + mcp__firecrawl-mcp__firecrawl_scrape (when available)

    • WebFetch first (free, instant): extract <title>, meta description, all <h1..h6>, lang, word count, internal-link count, image count. WebFetch returns markdown so anything in <head> beyond <title> is lost — the next bullet recovers it.
    • Firecrawl second (1 Firecrawl credit; pass formats: ["rawHtml"]) — recovers what WebFetch can't see. Pin the format to rawHtml; the default html is post-processed and silently strips canonical, hreflang, and <script type="application/ld+json"> blocks on many sites. If those head fields come back zero on a site that obviously has them (any major SaaS homepage), you forgot the rawHtml flag — re-run.
      • From metadata: og:title, og:description, og:image, twitter:card, viewport, robots meta, canonical URL.
      • From the returned rawHtml: every <script type="application/ld+json"> block. Parse each as JSON, list detected @types (Article, BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product, etc.). Note any block that fails to parse.
      • hreflang: count <link rel="alternate" hreflang="…"> occurrences in rawHtml.
    • If Firecrawl unavailable: the WebFetch portion still runs; populate Page basics' OG / Twitter / canonical / robots / JSON-LD / hreflang lines as (skipped — Firecrawl not installed). Don't infer from markdown.
    • Sense-check: does the page actually talk about its top-ranking keyword in title and H1? If a page ranks for keywords it doesn't address textually, that's a strong consolidation signal.
  3. Domain context DATA_getDomainOverviewWorldwide (parent domain)

    • Light-weight: parent DA, total keywords, total traffic. Used to contextualise the page's PA against its domain.
  4. Cannibalization check DATA_getDomainPages

    • Pull the parent domain's pages ranked by organic traffic. Cap at the top 50 — that's where the cannibalization risk concentrates.
    • For the candidate URL's top-3 traffic-weighted keywords (from step 3), scan the peer-page list: does any other URL on the same domain rank in the top 20 for any of those keywords?
    • Cannibalization signal: any peer URL ranking ≤ 20 for the candidate's top-3 keywords. Record peer URL, keyword, peer position vs candidate position, peer traffic.
    • Cheaper than the old approach. Previous versions cross-checked via DATA_getDomainKeywords on the parent domain — that endpoint can return tens of thousands of rows on large sites and is unnecessarily heavy for this question. DATA_getDomainPages ranked by traffic surfaces the high-impact peers directly.
    • If no peer URL competes, this signal is "no cannibalization detected" — pass through to step 9.
  5. Synthesise verdict

    • Apply the verdict heuristic (see Tips) to produce KEEP / REFRESH / CONSOLIDATE / KILL.
    • For REFRESH, identify the top 3 specific changes (e.g., "add an H2 on 'alternatives' which 7 of 10 SERP winners use").
    • Write PAGE.md (output spec below).

Output format

Create a folder seo-page-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/ with:

seo-page-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/
├── PAGE.md                       (synthesised verdict + plan — primary deliverable)
├── keywords.csv                  (full keyword list with positions — load-bearing CSV the auditor walks through row-by-row)
├── 04-serp-context.md            (top 10 + AIO for top 3–5 keywords — load-bearing reference for SERP-driven REFRESH discussions)
└── evidence/
    ├── 01-url-overview.md        (raw DATA_getUrlOverviewWorldwide)
    ├── 02-keywords.md             (raw DATA_getDomainKeywords filtered)
    ├── 03-authority.md            (PA + history)
    ├── 05-page-snapshot.md        (HTML extracts)
    └── 06-cannibalization.md      (peer pages on the same domain competing for the top-3 keywords)

Top-level: PAGE.md + keywords.csv + 04-serp-context.md. The other step files preserve raw API/HTML extracts in evidence/ for reproducibility — auditors lean on the CSV and SERP context, not the per-call dumps.

PAGE.md follows this shape:

# Page Intelligence: {URL}

> Snapshot dated {YYYY-MM-DD} · Country: {country} · Primary keyword: {keyword}

## Snapshot
- Ranking keywords: {n}
- Estimated monthly organic traffic: {n}
- Page authority: {PA} ({↑/↓ trajectory over 90 days})
- Primary topic: {topic}
- AIO citations: {n} of {checked} primary-keyword AIOs cite this URL
- GSC last 28d: {clicks} clicks / {impressions} impressions / {ctr}% CTR / avg position {n}  *(or `not configured` / `property not verified`)*
- Google sees: {INDEXED|EXCLUDED|...} · canonical {userCanonical} {→ googleCanonical if differ} · last crawled {YYYY-MM-DD}

## Page basics
- `<title>`: {value}
- meta description: {value | absent}
- `og:title`: {value | absent | skipped — Firecrawl required}
- `og:description`: {value | absent | skipped}
- `og:image`: {url | absent | skipped}
- `twitter:card`: {summary | summary_large_image | absent | skipped}
- `<link rel="canonical">`: {URL | self-referential | absent | skipped}
- meta robots: {index,follow | noindex,nofollow | absent | skipped}
- JSON-LD types detected: {Article, BreadcrumbList, Organization | none | skipped}
- hreflang variants: {n | skipped}

## What this page wins
- {keyword} — position {n}, ~{volume} monthly searches, ~{traffic} monthly clicks.
- ... (top 3–5)

## Almost-wins (page-2 refresh opportunities)
- {keyword} — position {n}, ~{volume} monthly searches. The top 3 SERP winners all do {pattern} that this page doesn't.
- ... (top 3 examples)

## What this page misses
- {keyword} — competitors {comp1}, {comp2} rank in top 5; this page is absent.
- ...

## Same-domain cannibalization
- {peer URL} — ranks position {n} for "{keyword}" (candidate ranks position {m}). Peer estimated traffic: {n}/mo.
- ... (only list rows where a peer URL ranks ≤ 20 for one of the candidate's top-3 keywords; if none, write "No same-domain cannibalization detected on top-3 keywords.")

## AI Search angle
- {n} of {checked} AIO queries on the URL's keywords cite this page.
- The AIOs that DON'T cite this page tend to cite {pattern} (e.g., comparison tables, step-by-step how-tos).
- Recommended GEO move: {one specific change}.

## Verdict: {KEEP | REFRESH | CONSOLIDATE | KILL}

Reasoning: {1–2 sentences anchored in objective signals from above}.

### If REFRESH — top 3 changes
1. {Specific change}
2. {Specific change}
3. {Specific change}

## Raw data
- keywords.csv — full enriched ranking-keyword list
- 04-serp-context.md — per-keyword SERP top-10 with AIO
- evidence/05-page-snapshot.md — HTML extracts

keywords.csv columns: keyword,volume,kd,position,intent,traffic_estimate,url

Tips

  • Respect SE Ranking Data API rate limit: 10 requests per second. The 3–5 SERP queries in step 5 should be paced sequentially.
  • Call DATA_getCreditBalance before running. ~10–15 credits is typical for one URL.
  • Verdict heuristic:
    • KEEP: PA stable or up; traffic stable or up; top 3 keywords held in their positions; AIO citations present where AIO appears.
    • REFRESH: any of (PA dropped >5 in 90 days; traffic dropped >20%; a top-3 keyword fell to position 11+; AIO citations missing while competitors get cited). Hardens when GSC data (step 4b) shows INDEXED + impressions > 100 + average position 4–10 (clear quick-win territory).
    • CONSOLIDATE: cannibalization detected (step 8) — a peer URL on the same domain ranks ≤ 20 for one or more of the candidate's top-3 keywords. CONSOLIDATE harden when the peer outranks the candidate AND captures higher traffic; otherwise CONSOLIDATE recommendation is "merge into the candidate" rather than "kill the candidate."
    • KILL: PA <10 AND traffic <50/mo AND no top-10 keyword AND no internal links pointing to it. Hardens when JSON-LD schema is also absent (Firecrawl detected zero blocks) — the page has no signals for any crawler, organic or AI. Also hardens when URL Inspection (step 4b) returns EXCLUDED for any reason.
    • GSC canonical mismatch (any verdict): if step 4b detects userCanonical ≠ googleCanonical, flag this as a critical issue in PAGE.md regardless of the verdict — it points at indexing instability that the verdict on its own can't resolve.
  • Don't invent reasons. Anchor every claim in PAGE.md to a number from the raw data files.
  • When between KEEP and REFRESH, default to REFRESH — small refreshes compound.
  • The keywords.csv is the auditable trail. If a stakeholder questions the verdict, walk them through the CSV row by row.
  • For pages with very low data (new pages, <5 ranking keywords), the verdict is unreliable. Flag as "insufficient data — re-run after 60 days" rather than forcing a verdict.
  • DATA_getPageAuthorityHistory all-zeros caveat: if the endpoint returns inlink_rank: 0 (or equivalent) for every date in the history window, treat as "insufficient history" — don't claim a drop or recommend REFRESH based on it. Often happens for very high-authority pages where the metric is saturated, or for URLs that haven't accumulated enough longitudinal data. Cross-check with DATA_getPageAuthority (current value) — if current PA is meaningful but history is flat-zero, flag the gap explicitly in PAGE.md rather than synthesising a trajectory.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Find the AI-search prompts and topics where a brand is invisible (or losing to competitors) in SE Ranking, then turn those gaps into a social campaign in Planable and set up before/after tracking. Use this skill whenever the user wants to improve how their brand shows up in AI answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overview, AI Mode) through content, or says things like "what should we post to get cited by AI", "where are competitors winning in AI answers and we're not", "create content for the prompts we're missing", "improve our AI visibility with social", "AEO/GEO content plan", or "turn our AI search gaps into posts". Always activate when AI-search visibility is the goal and Planable is where the content will be made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Build a data-backed client onboarding proposal for an agency starting a new engagement, combining an SE Ranking SEO + AI-search audit with a Planable analysis of the client's current social performance. Use this skill whenever an agency wants to show a new (or about-to-sign) client where they stand and what the plan is, or says things like "build an onboarding proposal for [client]", "we're starting with [client], put together the SEO + social analysis", "create a client proposal with audit and social baseline", "scope a SEO + AI + social engagement", or "show the client their opportunities and our plan". Assumes the client's social accounts are already connected in Planable. Always activate for new-engagement proposals that pair SE Ranking analysis with Planable social data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Build and track local search visibility with SE Ranking city-level rank tracking and turn it into local social content in Planable, including Google Business Profile posts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to grow a business's presence in a specific city or cities and pair it with local social, or says things like "track our rankings in [city]", "set up local rank tracking", "we want to show up in local search", "create Google Business Profile posts", "local SEO plus social for our locations", or "how are we ranking city by city and what should we post locally". Always activate for local/multi-location visibility work that combines SE Ranking rankings with Planable local/GMB content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

seo-ads

無料

Paid-search competitive landscape for a domain or keyword. Pulls SE Ranking's PPC data — domain ad keyword footprint, ad copy patterns, who else bids on the same keywords, SERP shopping/ad-pack visibility — and produces a competitive ads brief plus a recommended bid-keyword shortlist. Use when the user asks "paid search analysis", "competitor ads", "PPC competitive", "ad copy intelligence", "shopping pack", "who bids on this keyword", or "paid keyword footprint".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Generate a demand-gen landing page for an SEO agency, complete with pain-point hook, proof, a free-audit lead magnet flow, and CTAs tuned for cold traffic. Pulls real competitive and AI-search data for the agency's target niche to make the copy specific and credible. Use when the user asks for an SEO agency landing page, lead-gen page for an SEO agency, demand-gen page, free-audit landing page, or wants to convert cold traffic into discovery calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Measure AI Search share of voice for a target domain versus competitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overview, and AI Mode. Pulls the AIO leaderboard, then samples prompts where each domain appears as a source or brand mention, and analyses topic clusters each brand owns. Use when the user asks for AI Search share of voice, LLM visibility tracking, AEO/GEO analysis, AI Overview competitive analysis, or wants to know which brands LLMs cite in their category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

seranking のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する