本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

seo-subdomain

Subdomain ownership map for a domain. Lists subdomains, queries overview/keywords/competitors/backlinks per subdomain, surfaces which subdomains own which topic clusters, where there's fragmentation, and whether consolidation is warranted. Use when the user asks "subdomain analysis", "subdomain ownership", "subdomain SEO", "blog vs main domain", "support vs docs subdomain", or "should I consolidate subdomains".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skillsスター 188(GitHub 188 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Example output: examples/seo-subdomain-notion-so-20260514/SUBDOMAINS.md

Subdomain Analysis

Map a domain's subdomain ecosystem. Which subdomains exist, what each ranks for, where they overlap, and whether the structure is healthy or fragmented. Output: an ownership map (which topic is owned by which subdomain), a fragmentation report, and recommendations for consolidate / split / leave alone.

Prerequisites

  • SE Ranking MCP server connected.
  • User provides: a target root domain (e.g. example.com). The skill discovers subdomains automatically.
  • Optional: --limit N to cap the number of subdomains analysed (default: top 10 by ranked keyword count).

Process

  1. Validate & preflight

    • Normalise root domain (no protocol, no www.).
    • DATA_getCreditBalance — surface remaining credits. Subdomain analysis is N × ~5 calls; cost scales with subdomain count.
  2. Discover subdomains DATA_getDomainSubdomains

    • List all subdomains of the root domain.
    • For each: keyword count, traffic estimate, backlinks count.
    • Sort by ranked-keyword count descending.
    • Apply --limit (default top 10).
  3. Per-subdomain overview DATA_getDomainOverviewWorldwide

    • For each subdomain in scope: domain authority, traffic estimate, organic + paid keyword counts, top regions.
    • This establishes a baseline for cross-subdomain comparison.
  4. Per-subdomain top keywords DATA_getDomainKeywords

    • For each subdomain: top 100 organic keywords with positions, intent, traffic.
    • Cluster keywords by topic. This skill's grouping is a lightweight per-subdomain ownership map, not a content plan — token-grouping by head term + intent is sufficient here. (For full content-cluster planning use seo-keyword-cluster, which now clusters by SERP overlap, not text similarity.)
    • Each subdomain gets a list of "owned topics" (clusters where it dominates) and "minor topics".
  5. Per-subdomain competitors DATA_getDomainCompetitors

    • For each subdomain: top organic competitors by common_keywords.
    • Surface: do different subdomains have different competitor sets? (Sign of legitimately separate scopes.) Do they share competitors? (Sign of redundant scopes.)
  6. Per-subdomain backlinks DATA_getBacklinksSummary and DATA_getBacklinksRefDomains (top 20)

    • Subdomains often have separate backlink profiles. Capture each.
    • Surface: do subdomains have meaningfully different referring-domain populations?
  7. Authority distribution DATA_getDistributionOfDomainAuthority

    • For each subdomain, pull DA distribution of referring domains.
  8. Detect fragmentation

    • For each topic-cluster, identify all subdomains ranking for keywords in that cluster.
    • Fragmentation signal: ≥ 2 subdomains rank in the top 50 for the same high-volume keyword (cannibalization).
    • Healthy split: distinct topic clusters per subdomain, minimal overlap.
  9. Make recommendations

    • Consolidate: if blog.example.com and example.com/blog/ both rank for the same topic cluster but neither dominates — pick one canonical home.
    • Split: if a subdomain is ranking for a topic completely off-mission for the root domain, that's a split worth keeping.
    • Leave alone: if subdomains have distinct topic ownership and don't cannibalize, don't disturb.
    • Investigate: ambiguous cases flagged for human review.
  10. Synthesise SUBDOMAINS.md

Output format

Create a folder seo-subdomain-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/ with:

seo-subdomain-{target-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}/
├── SUBDOMAINS.md                       (synthesised report + recommendations — primary deliverable)
├── 06-topic-ownership-map.md           (cluster × subdomain matrix — load-bearing reference content teams brief from)
├── 07-fragmentation-flags.md           (cannibalization detected — load-bearing reference for consolidation decisions)
└── evidence/
    ├── 01-subdomains-list.md           (DATA_getDomainSubdomains — raw step output)
    ├── 02-overview-by-subdomain.md     (per-subdomain overview rows)
    ├── 03-keywords-by-subdomain/
    │   ├── blog-example-com.md
    │   ├── docs-example-com.md
    │   └── ...                          (one per subdomain)
    ├── 04-competitors-by-subdomain.md
    └── 05-backlinks-by-subdomain.md

Top-level: SUBDOMAINS.md + 06-topic-ownership-map.md + 07-fragmentation-flags.md. Content teams brief from the ownership map; consolidation decisions cite the fragmentation flags directly. The 01–05 step files preserve raw API outputs in evidence/.

SUBDOMAINS.md follows this shape:

# Subdomain Analysis: {root domain}

> Snapshot dated {YYYY-MM-DD} · Subdomains analysed: {n} of {n discovered} (limit: top {limit} by keyword count)

## Subdomain inventory

| Subdomain | Keywords | Traffic est. | Backlinks | Domain authority | Top topics owned |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {root} | {n} | {n}/mo | {n} | {DA} | {topics} |
| blog.{root} | {n} | {n}/mo | {n} | {DA} | {topics} |
| docs.{root} | {n} | {n}/mo | {n} | {DA} | {topics} |
| ... |

## Topic ownership map

| Topic cluster | Owned by | Also ranks (cannibalization?) |
|---|---|---|
| {topic 1} | blog.{root} (avg pos 3.2 across 47 keywords) | {root} (avg pos 12) — {⚠ cannibalization} |
| {topic 2} | docs.{root} | (none) |
| ... |

## Fragmentation flags

### {⚠ Cannibalization detected: topic = {topic X}}
- `blog.{root}` ranks {n} keywords for {topic X}, avg position {p}.
- `{root}` (root path) ranks {m} keywords for the same topic, avg position {p}.
- The two sets overlap on {k} exact keywords.
- **Recommendation:** consolidate to `blog.{root}` (the stronger ranker). 301 the root-path duplicates with intent preserved.

### ... (per fragmentation finding)

## Recommendations summary

- **Consolidate:** {n} subdomain pairs → see fragmentation flags above.
- **Split intentional and healthy:** {n} subdomains have distinct ownership; leave alone.
- **Investigate:** {n} edge cases flagged for human review.

## Risk notes

- Subdomain consolidation requires careful 301 redirect mapping; track via `seo-drift` after the migration.
- A subdomain with separate backlinks (per `evidence/05-backlinks-by-subdomain.md`) is harder to consolidate without losing link equity — plan accordingly.

## Raw data
- See per-subdomain files under `evidence/03-keywords-by-subdomain/`.
- Topic ownership matrix: `06-topic-ownership-map.md`.

Tips

  • Respect rate limit. The skill makes ~5 calls per subdomain. With --limit 10, that's ~50 calls; pace sequentially.
  • Call DATA_getCreditBalance before running. Cost scales with subdomain count: ~20–60 credits typical for --limit 10; up to 150+ for unlimited.
  • --limit is your friend. Sites with hundreds of subdomains (large platforms) don't need every subdomain analysed — top 10 by keyword count covers >90% of organic value usually.
  • Don't conflate "subdomain has lower DA" with "subdomain is bad." Subdomains often have lower DA than the root because they accumulate links separately. The question is topic ownership and cannibalization, not DA per se.
  • Consolidation is risky. A 301 from blog.example.com to example.com/blog/ retains most link equity but can lose 5–15% in transition. Track post-migration with seo-drift.
  • Don't recommend consolidation when one subdomain is on a different platform. If blog.example.com is on a different CMS, the engineering cost of consolidation may exceed the SEO benefit. Surface this as a constraint, not a recommendation.
  • The topic-ownership matrix is the highest-leverage artifact. Use it to brief content teams on which subdomain should publish what.
  • Pair with seo-page to deep-dive into specific URLs flagged in cannibalization.
  • Pair with seo-drift to baseline subdomains before major restructures.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Find the AI-search prompts and topics where a brand is invisible (or losing to competitors) in SE Ranking, then turn those gaps into a social campaign in Planable and set up before/after tracking. Use this skill whenever the user wants to improve how their brand shows up in AI answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overview, AI Mode) through content, or says things like "what should we post to get cited by AI", "where are competitors winning in AI answers and we're not", "create content for the prompts we're missing", "improve our AI visibility with social", "AEO/GEO content plan", or "turn our AI search gaps into posts". Always activate when AI-search visibility is the goal and Planable is where the content will be made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Build a data-backed client onboarding proposal for an agency starting a new engagement, combining an SE Ranking SEO + AI-search audit with a Planable analysis of the client's current social performance. Use this skill whenever an agency wants to show a new (or about-to-sign) client where they stand and what the plan is, or says things like "build an onboarding proposal for [client]", "we're starting with [client], put together the SEO + social analysis", "create a client proposal with audit and social baseline", "scope a SEO + AI + social engagement", or "show the client their opportunities and our plan". Assumes the client's social accounts are already connected in Planable. Always activate for new-engagement proposals that pair SE Ranking analysis with Planable social data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Build and track local search visibility with SE Ranking city-level rank tracking and turn it into local social content in Planable, including Google Business Profile posts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to grow a business's presence in a specific city or cities and pair it with local social, or says things like "track our rankings in [city]", "set up local rank tracking", "we want to show up in local search", "create Google Business Profile posts", "local SEO plus social for our locations", or "how are we ranking city by city and what should we post locally". Always activate for local/multi-location visibility work that combines SE Ranking rankings with Planable local/GMB content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

seo-ads

無料

Paid-search competitive landscape for a domain or keyword. Pulls SE Ranking's PPC data — domain ad keyword footprint, ad copy patterns, who else bids on the same keywords, SERP shopping/ad-pack visibility — and produces a competitive ads brief plus a recommended bid-keyword shortlist. Use when the user asks "paid search analysis", "competitor ads", "PPC competitive", "ad copy intelligence", "shopping pack", "who bids on this keyword", or "paid keyword footprint".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Generate a demand-gen landing page for an SEO agency, complete with pain-point hook, proof, a free-audit lead magnet flow, and CTAs tuned for cold traffic. Pulls real competitive and AI-search data for the agency's target niche to make the copy specific and credible. Use when the user asks for an SEO agency landing page, lead-gen page for an SEO agency, demand-gen page, free-audit landing page, or wants to convert cold traffic into discovery calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

Measure AI Search share of voice for a target domain versus competitors across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overview, and AI Mode. Pulls the AIO leaderboard, then samples prompts where each domain appears as a source or brand mention, and analyses topic clusters each brand owns. Use when the user asks for AI Search share of voice, LLM visibility tracking, AEO/GEO analysis, AI Overview competitive analysis, or wants to know which brands LLMs cite in their category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seranking/seo-skills1882026年6月25日 更新

seranking のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する