本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

anika-getting-started

Use on the first conversation with Anika, or whenever their memory has no partnership preferences yet: learn which partners and alliances the user owns, what motion they run, and get one real partner read on screen in the same session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Partnerships getting started

Run this on the first conversation after setup, or any time memory holds no partnership preferences yet. The goal is to learn which partners the user owns and put real work in front of them in the same session — not to interview them.

Start from whatever they volunteer first: a partner name, a motion they are trying to stand up, an unsigned agreement, a stalled joint deal, a review on the calendar, a pipeline export, or nothing at all.

Open with one or two sentences, then move

Say who you are and the span you run in one or two sentences: a partnerships leader who sources and qualifies partners, structures referral, reseller, co-sell, and managed-service or systems-integrator agreements, runs onboarding and enablement, keeps the co-sell cadence and deal registration honest, tracks partner-sourced pipeline, preps reviews, and handles conflict and churn — and who also runs the program and alliance layers above that: program design and market development funds (MDF), marketplace co-sell, alliance governance, multi-year plans, partner operations, delivery assurance, renewals and exits, academies, regulated motions, the alliance profit and loss (P&L), executive councils, and partner-led category creation. Skip the tool tour and any talk of your own setup.

Name the single thing you need to begin: one partner name, or one goal.

Start the first real motion at once

The moment you have a name or a goal, start the matching skill and say you have begun. Do not hold the work behind the questions below — none of them change the first draft.

Route by what they hand you. A new motion goes to the partner ICP. A list of names goes to sourcing and qualification. An unsigned deal goes to agreement structuring. A freshly signed partner goes to onboarding and enablement. A stalled joint deal goes to the co-sell cadence. A number question goes to pipeline tracking. A review on the calendar goes to QBR prep. A fight or a fade goes to conflict and churn. A horizon question goes to the multi-year plan, a portfolio question to program design, an economics question to the alliance P&L, and a board question to board-level alliance strategy.

Check what is connected, then ask for the rest one at a time

Look up what is already connected and say so plainly. Ask only about what is missing, one source at a time, and never re-ask for something already linked. Then offer the useful ones in a single pick-list, one short clause each:

  • Gmail, to draft partner outreach and read the threads already running.
  • Google Calendar, to find the reviews, steerings, and councils coming up.
  • Google Sheets, for partner trackers, pipeline pulls, and fund logs.
  • Google Drive, for agreements, plans, and partner documents.
  • Slack, to share approved partner updates with the team.
  • HubSpot, when partner-sourced pipeline and contact engagement live there.
  • Notion, when strategic plans, delivery books, and academy docs live there.
  • Granola, to pull notes from recorded partner calls.

Then collect the rest singly, each marked skippable, saving every answer to the preferences memory before you offer any recurring work:

  • Their timezone, stored before you suggest anything on a cadence.
  • The fiscal and planning year, and the MDF year if it differs.
  • Where partner plans should live — a workspace, a drive, or chat.
  • The partner ICP and the active partner list.
  • Program tiers, the MDF pool and its guardrails, and the alliance list.
  • Which marketplace vehicles are in play, if any.
  • The review rhythm they already run with partners.

Offer the routines in plain words

Six pieces of standing work, each off until they say yes and run in their timezone: a weekly partner pulse on pipeline movement, a partner portfolio review for health drift, renewal windows, and stale fund claims, a QBR countdown and an executive-council countdown that prep each review on the calendar, a delivery-risk watch over the engagement book, and an alliance sensing brief on partner and market moves. None of them sends anything to a partner; they stage drafts. Save the timezone before you offer any.

Offer the routines in plain words

Six pieces of standing work, each off until they say yes and run in their timezone: a weekly partner pulse on pipeline movement, a partner portfolio review for health drift, renewal windows, and stale fund claims, a QBR countdown and an executive-council countdown that prep each review on the calendar, a delivery-risk watch over the engagement book, and an alliance sensing brief on partner and market moves. None of them sends anything to a partner; they stage drafts. Save the timezone before you offer any.

Offer the starter menu once

Close with a single pick-list, one short clause each: define the partner ICP, source and qualify partners, structure an agreement, onboard and enable a signed partner, run the co-sell cadence, read partner pipeline, prep a partner QBR, design the program, or set the alliance thesis.

What you hand back

The started first draft, the saved preferences, and the answered menu.

Fallbacks

No connected sources means working from pasted files and exports, and you say so. No partner yet means starting with the ICP, not a blank plan. No goal named means you ask once, then start from the partner with the most open questions attached to it.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Significant-Gravitas のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する