Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profile and explore a dataset to understand its shape, quality, and patterns. Use when encountering a new table or file, checking null rates and column distributions, spotting data quality issues like duplicates or suspicious values, or deciding which dimensions and metrics to analyze.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Packaging adaptation by AutoGPT, 2026-09-25. Original authorship and licence are retained. Changes are limited to the recorded name, metadata and file references; see ATTRIBUTION.md in this skill package.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a comprehensive data profile for a table or uploaded file. Understand its shape, quality, and patterns before diving into analysis.
/explore-data <table_name or file>
If a data warehouse MCP server is connected:
If a file is provided (CSV, Excel, Parquet, JSON):
If neither:
Before analyzing any data, understand its structure:
Table-level questions:
Column classification — categorize each column as one of:
Run the following profiling checks:
Table-level metrics:
All columns:
Numeric columns (metrics):
min, max, mean, median (p50)
standard deviation
percentiles: p1, p5, p25, p75, p95, p99
zero count
negative count (if unexpected)
String columns (dimensions, text):
min length, max length, avg length
empty string count
pattern analysis (do values follow a format?)
case consistency (all upper, all lower, mixed?)
leading/trailing whitespace count
Date/timestamp columns:
min date, max date
null dates
future dates (if unexpected)
distribution by month/week
gaps in time series
Boolean columns:
true count, false count, null count
true rate
Present the profile as a clean summary table, grouped by column type (dimensions, metrics, dates, IDs).
Apply the quality assessment framework below. Flag potential problems:
After profiling individual columns:
Based on the column profile, recommend:
Suggest 3-5 specific analyses the user could run next:
## Data Profile: [table_name]
### Overview
- Rows: 2,340,891
- Columns: 23 (8 dimensions, 6 metrics, 4 dates, 5 IDs)
- Date range: 2021-03-15 to 2024-01-22
### Column Details
[summary table]
### Data Quality Issues
[flagged issues with severity]
### Recommended Explorations
[numbered list of suggested follow-up analyses]
Rate each column:
Look for:
Red flags that suggest accuracy issues:
For numeric columns, characterize the distribution:
For time series data, look for:
Identify natural segments by:
Between numeric columns:
When documenting a dataset for team use:
## Table: [schema.table_name]
**Description**: [What this table represents]
**Grain**: [One row per...]
**Primary Key**: [column(s)]
**Row Count**: [approximate, with date]
**Update Frequency**: [real-time / hourly / daily / weekly]
**Owner**: [team or person responsible]
### Key Columns
| Column | Type | Description | Example Values | Notes |
|--------|------|-------------|----------------|-------|
| user_id | STRING | Unique user identifier | "usr_abc123" | FK to users.id |
| event_type | STRING | Type of event | "click", "view", "purchase" | 15 distinct values |
| revenue | DECIMAL | Transaction revenue in USD | 29.99, 149.00 | Null for non-purchase events |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | When the event occurred | 2024-01-15 14:23:01 | Partitioned on this column |
### Relationships
- Joins to `users` on `user_id`
- Joins to `products` on `product_id`
- Parent of `event_details` (1:many on event_id)
### Known Issues
- [List any known data quality issues]
- [Note any gotchas for analysts]
### Common Query Patterns
- [Typical use cases for this table]
When connected to a data warehouse, use these patterns to discover schema:
-- List all tables in a schema (PostgreSQL)
SELECT table_name, table_type
FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = 'public'
ORDER BY table_name;
-- Column details (PostgreSQL)
SELECT column_name, data_type, is_nullable, column_default
FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = 'my_table'
ORDER BY ordinal_position;
-- Table sizes (PostgreSQL)
SELECT relname, pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(relid))
FROM pg_catalog.pg_statio_user_tables
ORDER BY pg_total_relation_size(relid) DESC;
-- Row counts for all tables (general pattern)
-- Run per-table: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table_name
When exploring an unfamiliar data environment:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。