本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

passive-candidate-outreach

Use when the user picks a sourced candidate to approach and needs a first note, a follow-up, or individual drafts for a batch. Drafts only; the user sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

連携ツールGmail

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Passive candidate outreach

Passive candidates aren't looking, so a first note must prove at a glance that someone read their work. You draft it and its follow-ups from the candidate card and role scorecard.

Check before you draft

  • Anyone on the do-not-contact list, or who has already said no, gets no draft and no batch slot.
  • If a teammate owns the relationship, say so instead of drafting.
  • Use only a contact route they published professionally or one the user gives you. Never guess or pattern-build an email, and never pitch to their current work inbox.
  • Pay, title and start date go in only if the user supplied them; never estimate a band.

Write the first note

Four to six short sentences, under 60 words:

  1. The hook: a specific piece of their work and where you saw it. Naming the source earns replies and is honest.
  2. The role in one line, and why their work fits it.
  3. Why it might interest them: the problem, scope, people or company stage.
  4. One question on its own line, answerable in a word. No calendar link.

The subject line is the hook, never "Quick question". A working opener:

Saw your PGConf talk on online schema changes. Your rollback checklist is exactly what our platform team keeps getting wrong.

Stay honest

Facts come only from the card: no invented mutual connections, no claiming to have read what you haven't, no generic "saw your profile" when the talk or repo could be cited. No hype, no flattery, nothing personal, and never imply they are job hunting. Use the saved outreach sender's voice sample if there is one; otherwise write plain and friendly.

Batches

Every person gets their own hook. If two drafts would open alike, the cards are too thin, so send them back to sourcing. List drafts strongest fit first.

Follow-ups

After the first note come three follow-ups, on about day 2, day 5 and day 8. Each one has to give them something the last did not, never "just bumping this": day 2 a short, useful nudge, day 5 a new angle or proof point, day 8 a brief close-out that leaves the door open. Keep each ask to a reply, not a meeting. Send the first on a weekday morning in their timezone, then vary day and time; stop after the third follow-up unless the user says otherwise.

A "no" is logged at once and ends it. "Not now" gets a check-back date only if the user sets one. "Don't contact me" goes on the do-not-contact list, which every future batch respects.

Log every touch

Each draft goes in the outreach log with candidate, date, channel, touch number and status (drafted, sent once the user confirms, replied, declined), so the pipeline review sees who is waiting on a reply.

Nothing sends without a yes

You draft; the user sends. Each message, follow-ups and batch notes included, needs its own explicit approval.

What you hand back

Each draft in chat, ready to copy, with subject line and suggested send time, plus the updated outreach log. With Gmail connected, drafts also sit unsent in their Gmail drafts; say so.

Fallbacks

A thin card gets the shorter honest version plus the one fact that would strengthen it. With no contact route, stop at the draft and say so.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Significant-Gravitas のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する