Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a strategic partner needs more than an annual plan: one, three, and five-year horizons, a capability scorecard, and executive governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this when a strategic partner needs more than an annual plan. Start from the partner, the current joint plan and its review grades, the executive sponsors on both sides, capability notes, and the horizon goal.
Multi-year plans are earned by actively engaged partners. Everyone else gets the annual plan, and you say so plainly.
Build, Develop, Market, Sell — across one, three, and five-year horizons, on the standard plan shape: goals, dated commitments, milestones, metrics, governance, sponsors.
Year one is dated commitments. Years three and five are directional, each with the gate that unlocks it. Every lane names an owner on each side.
Put every assumption at the top, marked as an assumption.
Score the partner 1 to 5 on Sell, Implement, Market, and Support, with one line of evidence per score. Every gap below 3 becomes a dated build item with an owner — never a wish. A score with no evidence stays UNKNOWN.
One sponsor per side. An operating committee plus a tiered review rhythm — strategic partners quarterly, growth partners semi-annually — under an annual plan refresh. Decision rights: who rules what. The escalation path with its SLA.
A sponsor who is only a title gets a sponsor-ask draft, not a seat on the committee.
Dated roadmap milestones, and at most five metrics. Each metric carries a number, a band, dual owners, and a source. At least one is revenue or pipeline, tagged sourced or influenced.
Report attainment as year-to-date actual against plan, with the year-on-year change alongside.
The multi-year plan under three pages, the capability scorecard, the sponsor map, and the dated milestones with their metrics.
No joint plan on file means drafting year one from the standard joint-plan shape and marking it INFERENCE. No sponsor means the sponsor ask comes before the governance document.
No plan, scorecard, sponsor map, or milestone set goes to the partner without your explicit yes.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。