Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a partner QBR or business review is coming: grade the quarter against benchmarks, co-draft the agenda, ship the pre-read, land the recap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this when a partner quarterly business review is coming. Start from the partner and the review date, the joint targets and their metrics, CRM and pipeline numbers, call notes, and the champion's own view of the quarter.
Set a benchmark per metric first, then grade against its band — red, yellow, or green: revenue, win rate, certification completion, lead conversion, market development fund (MDF) return, support response, portal engagement. Pipeline and forecast grade against the coverage target. Executive sponsorship on both sides gets named, not scored away.
Weight the metrics into one overall score, add a qualitative note per metric, and chart the trend over time. A grade with no evidence stays UNKNOWN.
Sixty to ninety minutes, timed, in this shape: the results snapshot; win/loss and push/pull with the why behind each; a forecast-accuracy review (pushes by stage, pulled-in deals, repeat over- and under-promisers with their guardrails); issue resolution including registration disputes; next-quarter targets that are specific, measurable, and dated; and the one decision the review has to make.
Name the executive sponsor on each side and what each of them cares about.
Health below the agreed bar for two quarters running — say, under 5 on a 10-point weighted overall score — triggers a partner improvement plan: a 45-day review, and tier demotion if it fails.
One page, numbers first, no surprises in the room. Stage it for the owner's yes — nothing reaches the partner without it.
Decisions, owners, dates, and what changes in the plan because of them.
The graded review pack, the co-drafted agenda, the staged pre-read, and the 24-hour recap draft.
No joint targets on file means you grade activity instead — meetings, deals touched, certifications — and put target-setting as the review's first decision.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。