本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

pl-analyze

PL (Project Lead) role sub-skill for incident analysis and process evaluation. Loaded through the pl core routing table, or when the owner explicitly asks for a retrospective or root-cause write-up; NEVER auto-load from ambient context.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB
  • scripts/selftest/run-selftest.sh1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

PL · Analyze — incident analysis & process evaluation

Scripts named below run as bash "${PL_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/<name>.sh" ..., where PL_SKILL_DIR is the absolute path of the pl skill directory; set it in the same Bash call. The workspace layout (ai-doc/..., ledgers) is documented in the pl core's State files section; a source that does not exist in this project is skipped and noted in the analysis.

Sub-skill of the PL role, also usable standalone. Words such as journey, callsign, night shift and take-over are defined once, in the pl core's Terms glossary. The rules in this file are the PL role's defaults; a project may choose otherwise.

Invoke when something went wrong — an escaped bug, a stalled run, a run killed at its time limit, an estimate blowup, a protocol breach, a close-audit FAIL — or when the owner ("owner" means whoever owns the work, often the user) asks for a retrospective, a root-cause account of what went wrong, or for periodic process evaluation (patterns in estimate errors, recurring frictions). The deliverable is never just an explanation: it is a verified cause AND a fix landed in the right place. Core iron rules bind unchanged; the owner is addressed in the user's own language.

Method — evidence first, always from disk

Sessions lie and die; disk is the memory. Rebuild the timeline exclusively from:

  • sno reach log --as <your-strict-address> --work <id> — the journey's full message provenance (sno reach export --work <id> --output <path> keeps the full thread bytes); command grammar is defined in ~/.local/lib/sno-reach/current/guide/agent-reach.md
  • ai-doc/JOURNAL/routing-ledger.jsonl — routed/closed/correction events (board_closed lines are written by bash "${PL_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/todo.sh" close; the PL writes the journey's own routed, closed and correction lines by hand)
  • ai-doc/ACTIVE/PL/exec-logs/ + dispatch files under ai-doc/ACTIVE/PL/dispatch/
  • git log/diff of the journey's commits when the project uses git (the fence file lists the paths the journey may touch)
  • the convergence series (the recorded remaining-work counts per fix cycle; bash "${PL_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/convergence-watch.sh" verdict --journey <id>)
  • ~/.local/state/agent-spawns.jsonl + agent-callsigns.jsonl + tmux autopsy (an executor killed at its time limit leaves its session up — read the screen)

Reports, memories, and your own recollection are HYPOTHESES to check against this record, never evidence. Timestamp every step; a contradiction between two sources is a finding, not noise. N different-looking failures arriving together get ONE joined timeline BEFORE any is diagnosed separately — join the timestamps in the target machine's system log first; cascades collapse into one root event and red herrings die at the join — several apparently separate failures are often one shared cause. A status table built from disk beats a report built from a stale card — trust the freshest disk join, not the most confident narrator.

Root-cause classification → fix location

The class DECIDES where the fix lands — never write a note where a mechanism belongs:

ClassSignatureFix lands in
Machinery buga script/skill deterministically did the wrong thingthe skill CODE (script fix + test), then reinstalled
Judgment lapsethe agent saw the signal and chose wrong / waited on a humanMECHANIZE it — an alarm/verdict/gate in scripts (e.g. a stalled-close alarm); a memory note is NOT a fix
Estimation errorestimate vs actual > 2×the est/actual pair → calibration material for agentic-time-estimate (when installed; otherwise a plain note of the pair)
Knowledge trapa known trap, hit againthe lessons file ai-doc/LESSONS.md (written only by the PL; a trap enters the index on its SECOND hit — see the pl core, Lessons file)
Process gapno rule existed for the situationretro proposal → owner approval → skill text patch (never self-edited mid-journey)

Design principle: the machine must lose patience before the owner does — every place the owner had to scold marks a missing mechanical control; an analysis is not done until that control is named (or shown to already exist).

Output shape

Owner-facing report, written in the user's own language, four sections: (1) conclusion — what broke, one line; (2) evidence chain — the 2–4 load-bearing facts, each with its path/command; (3) where the fix lands — the fix and its location per the table above; (4) recurrence prevention — the check/alarm/rule that now exists. Agent-facing: the same content as an English postmortem section in the journey's journal entry, plus ledger correction events wherever the durable record was wrong.

Routing the lessons

A finished analysis routes each lesson to the file that OWNS the behavior: dispatch-time rules → pl-dispatch; in-flight controls and alarms → pl-watch; close/probe rules → pl-audit; environment checks → pl-env; board/memory/Reach-substrate law → the pl core. A lesson without a named owner file is not landed.

Boundaries

  • Script/machinery fixes land directly ONLY within the core iron-rule-1 exception: PL-owned control scripts under the pl skill's scripts/, with a test, then reinstalled and reported to the owner. Anything else that needs code — repo source, other skills' scripts — is dispatched to an executor, never hand-edited. SKILL text changes still ride the retro → owner-approval path (core boundary).
  • Estimation analysis only FILES the calibration pair — rate/multiplier changes belong to the estimator skill's own validation loop (when installed).
  • Analysis of a journey never reopens settled owner rulings; if the cause traces to a ruling, report the trace, don't relitigate.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Answer how long agent work will take, how much longer active work needs, or what clock time applies. Estimate full AI-agent wall time, measure active progress first, and get owner-facing times from `sno report-time`. Never estimate human-developer time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

Give the owner one page when they come back from sleep, a meeting or a long run: what got done, what is stuck, what waits for their answer, and what it cost in quota. Use when the owner asks what happened while they were away, wants a status page, or when you finish a long stretch of work and must report it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

Report how many problems the two brains found: mutual review (the other model checks the work, from the peer-review records) and self-check (an agent finds its own error in its own conversation, judged by that agent's own model), side by side. Use when the owner asks whether the second agent or the reviews are worth it, or wants the week's review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

charter

無料

Write, revise or review a charter: the one document that tells an executor what to deliver, what is out of bounds, what the owner already decided, and how each success check will be proven. Use when work needs a written brief before someone else does it, or when asked to write, change or check a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

cos

無料

MANUAL-ONLY: load solely when the human owner types `/cos`, uses `$cos`, or asks you to act as the Chief of Staff (COS). The COS is the one agent the owner talks to; it coordinates the owner and the per-project Project Leads (PLs). A task card, charter, or dispatch makes you an executor, not COS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

sno-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する