JD Intelligence Analyzer

Phase 0 — Hard Eligibility

Extract:

• graduation batch / degree completion timing;
• student/new-grad status;
• degree discipline;
• location / relocation;
• work authorization / sponsorship;
• internship/full-time availability;
• mandatory years of experience;
• other explicit application conditions.

Classify each: Meets / Does not meet / Unclear.

Phase 1 — Requirement Classification

Classify statements as:

• Required — explicit must-have qualification/responsibility;
• Preferred — desirable but not mandatory;
• Context — domain, team, culture, or secondary technology information.

Do not infer "critical" solely from keyword repetition. Repeated words may reflect writing style rather than hiring weight.

Phase 2 — Responsibility Map

Extract the actual work:

• systems to build or support;
• users/stakeholders;
• data or infrastructure involved;
• quality/security/reliability expectations;
• collaboration responsibilities.

Phase 3 — Evidence Map

For each criterion, mark:

• Direct — demonstrated in experience/project;
• Indirect — coursework/certification/adjacent work;
• Missing — no truthful evidence;
• Unknown — evidence not yet checked.

Example:

Criterion	Type	Candidate evidence	Strength
Python	Required	FastAPI + ML projects	Direct
AWS	Preferred	AWS re/Start credential	Indirect
2 years production experience	Required	Student internships	Missing

Phase 4 — Language for Tailoring

Identify terminology worth using exactly when truthful:

• official tool/product names;
• role-specific nouns;
• responsibility wording.

Do not target a fixed repetition count.

Phase 5 — Ambiguities and Risks

Surface:

• contradictory experience requirements;
• unclear graduation eligibility;
• "preferred" items presented like requirements;
• role titles that do not match responsibilities;
• vague scope;
• unusual availability conditions.

Output

JD + Eligibility Briefing

1. hard eligibility table;
2. required criteria;
3. preferred criteria;
4. top responsibilities;
5. requirement-to-evidence matrix;
6. missing/unclear evidence;
7. role-family recommendation for selecting the correct resume variant.

You may summarize coverage as counts, e.g. "6 required criteria have direct evidence, 1 indirect, 1 missing." Do not label this an ATS score or hiring probability.