Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
dual-axis-skill-reviewer
Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.
含まれるファイル(7)
- SKILL.md4.3 KB
- references/llm_review_schema.md938 B
- references/scoring_rubric.md1.4 KB
- scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py36.0 KB
- scripts/tests/__init__.py0 B
- scripts/tests/conftest.py701 B
- scripts/tests/test_run_dual_axis_review.py22.6 KB
SKILL.md(原文)
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Dual Axis Skill Reviewer
Run the dual-axis reviewer script and save reports to reports/.
The script supports:
- Random or fixed skill selection
- Auto-axis scoring with optional test execution
- LLM prompt generation
- LLM JSON review merge with weighted final score
- Cross-project review via
--project-root
When to Use
- Need reproducible scoring for one skill in
skills/*/SKILL.md. - Need improvement items when final score is below 90.
- Need both deterministic checks and qualitative LLM code/content review.
- Need to review skills in a different project from the command line.
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+
uv(recommended — auto-resolvespyyamldependency via inline metadata)- For tests:
uv sync --extra devor equivalent in the target project - For LLM-axis merge: JSON file that follows the LLM review schema (see Resources)
Workflow
Determine the correct script path based on your context:
- Same project:
skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py - Global install:
~/.claude/skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py
The examples below use REVIEWER as a placeholder. Set it once:
# If reviewing from the same project:
REVIEWER=skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py
# If reviewing another project (global install):
REVIEWER=~/.claude/skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py
Step 1: Run Auto Axis + Generate LLM Prompt
uv run "$REVIEWER" \
--project-root . \
--emit-llm-prompt \
--output-dir reports/
When reviewing a different project, point --project-root to it:
uv run "$REVIEWER" \
--project-root /path/to/other/project \
--emit-llm-prompt \
--output-dir reports/
Step 2: Run LLM Review
- Use the generated prompt file in
reports/skill_review_prompt_<skill>_<timestamp>.md. - Ask the LLM to return strict JSON output.
- When running inside Claude Code, let Claude act as orchestrator: read the generated prompt, produce the LLM review JSON, and save it for the merge step.
Step 3: Merge Auto + LLM Axes
uv run "$REVIEWER" \
--project-root . \
--skill <skill-name> \
--llm-review-json <path-to-llm-review.json> \
--auto-weight 0.5 \
--llm-weight 0.5 \
--output-dir reports/
Step 4: Optional Controls
- Fix selection for reproducibility:
--skill <name>or--seed <int> - Review all skills at once:
--all - Skip tests for quick triage:
--skip-tests - Change report location:
--output-dir <dir> - Increase
--auto-weightfor stricter deterministic gating. - Increase
--llm-weightwhen qualitative/code-review depth is prioritized.
Output
reports/skill_review_<skill>_<timestamp>.jsonreports/skill_review_<skill>_<timestamp>.mdreports/skill_review_prompt_<skill>_<timestamp>.md(when--emit-llm-promptis enabled)
Installation (Global)
To use this skill from any project, symlink it into ~/.claude/skills/:
ln -sfn /path/to/claude-trading-skills/skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer \
~/.claude/skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer
After this, Claude Code will discover the skill in all projects, and the script is accessible at ~/.claude/skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py.
Resources
- Auto axis scores metadata, workflow coverage, execution safety, artifact presence, and test health.
- Auto axis detects
knowledge_onlyskills and adjusts script/test expectations to avoid unfair penalties. - LLM axis scores deep content quality (correctness, risk, missing logic, maintainability).
- Final score is weighted average.
- If final score is below 90, improvement items are required and listed in the markdown report.
- Script:
skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/scripts/run_dual_axis_review.py - LLM schema:
references/llm_review_schema.md - Rubric detail:
references/scoring_rubric.md
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。