本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

write-blog

Write and ship a blog post for your project that reads like a human wrote it and pulls SEO traffic to your site. Use when a contributor wants to draft, edit, or publish a blog post, add a post to the site, write about the project for search/traction, or make an existing draft sound less like AI. Enforces the house voice (no em dashes), picks a non-cannibalizing angle, uses ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English for technical prose, wires the post into your site, and runs the humanizer pass before shipping.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • check.sh2.2 KB
  • README.md804 B
  • reference/angles.md2.6 KB
  • reference/craft.md4.5 KB
  • reference/seo.md6.3 KB
  • reference/voice.md4.4 KB
  • reference/wiring.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Write a blog post

You are helping a contributor write a blog post for the project's website. The bar: it reads like a person wrote it, it ranks for a search cluster no other post already owns, and it ships wired correctly into the site with the build green.

Use ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English (STE) for the post's technical and instructional prose. Use short, direct sentences, consistent terms, clear actions, and the approved meaning of technical words when the STE dictionary is available. Do not use idioms, slang, figurative language, or synonym changes that can make a technical term unclear. Preserve exact code, commands, identifiers, product names, and quotations. The post can keep a human opinion and a concrete example, but clarity takes priority over rhythm or decoration. Do not claim strict STE conformance without checking the current ASD-STE100 issue and dictionary.

This skill exists so every contributor writes in the same voice, picks non-overlapping topics, and passes the same anti-AI-slop gate, whether or not they already know the house rules.

The one rule that gets a post rejected

No em dashes (—) or en dashes (–). Ever. The house voice bans them. Use a period, a comma, or "so"/"because"/parentheses instead. A single dash in a draft is a hard fail. There is a scanner: run bash check.sh <file> (in this skill's folder) on any draft before you call it done.

Workflow

Do these in order. Don't skip the angle check or the humanizer pass.

1. Read the ground truth first

Before writing a word, read what already exists so you match voice and don't cannibalize keywords:

  • Your site's post registry / index. Whatever lists every published post (a registry file, a content collection, a CMS list, or the frontmatter across your blog's source directory). This is the live record of every published post and the angle it owns. Read every slug, title, description, and tag set.
  • One or two full published posts (the prose sources) to absorb the voice.
  • reference/angles.md (in this skill folder) for how to pick an angle that doesn't collide, plus the topics still untapped.
  • reference/voice.md for the house voice and the anti-AI checklist, self-contained.
  • reference/craft.md for the writing craft: leads that win the click, spine structure, and which creative-writing skill to reach for at each stage.
  • reference/seo.md for on-page keyword placement, internal linking, verifying the machine-readable SEO, and the post-ship distribution loop that earns the first backlinks.

2. Pick and pitch the angle

Every post must own a distinct search cluster. Two posts fighting for the same keywords cannibalize each other. From your post index and reference/angles.md, pick an angle no shipped post already owns, then pitch it back to the contributor in one line before drafting: the working title, the one-sentence thesis, and the 3-5 keyword phrases it targets. Confirm before you write the body. If they gave you a topic that collides with an existing post, say so and propose the adjacent-but-distinct angle instead.

3. Outline

A good post has a spine, not a listicle. Read reference/craft.md before you outline; the lead and the H2-spine are 80% of whether the post gets finished and ranked. Structure:

  • A lead (description + opening) that names a concrete, specific problem the reader has. Not "AI agents are transforming collaboration." Something like "Two agents can talk about a change all day. Handing over the change itself, byte for byte, is a different problem."
  • 4-7 sections, each with a claim and real code, real commands, or a real number from your project backing it. Read the actual source and docs of your project and quote it accurately. Made-up APIs are worse than no code.
  • A "what this is NOT" or honest-limitations beat. The voice is a little contrarian and admits what's deferred. That honesty is what makes it not read like marketing.
  • A close that lands the thesis without a generic "in conclusion, the future is bright" wrap-up. End on a concrete thing the reader can do or check.

4. Draft

Write the prose as plain markdown first, in your blog's source directory (the source of truth). Follow reference/voice.md, reference/craft.md, and the STE guidance above as you write. Keep it honest, concrete, and grounded in real project code. Use one clear opinion and support it with evidence. If /direct-response-copy is available in your environment, run it on the title, description, and closing CTA (only those three surfaces, not the body).

5. Humanize (mandatory)

Run a humanizer pass on the draft: if /humanizer is available in your environment, invoke it on the draft. If it isn't available, apply the checklist in reference/voice.md yourself. Then run an STE pass. Check sentence length, clear subjects and actions, consistent technical terms, approved word meanings when available, and intentional exceptions. Strip: significance inflation, promotional adjectives, the rule of three, "-ing" tail analyses, negative parallelisms ("it's not X, it's Y"), synonym cycling, hedging, and every dash. For headline/description/CTA polish you may also pull in /direct-response-copy if it's available.

Then run bash check.sh <draft-file> and fix anything it flags.

6. Wire it into the site

Follow reference/wiring.md. In short: register the post in whatever index/registry your blog uses, add the body in your blog's format, make sure the SEO surfaces (sitemap, RSS, OG/Twitter cards, JSON-LD) include the new post, add the cover image, and build. For keyword placement (title/description/first-H2/tags), internal-link count, and anchor-text rules, follow reference/seo.md. Add a reciprocal inbound link from the most related existing post.

7. Verify before done

Your site's build command must be green. Then smoke-test the post: confirm the post page, the cover image, the blog index, the sitemap, and the RSS feed all load and include the new post. View source on the post and confirm the meta description, OG/Twitter tags, and BlogPosting JSON-LD actually emitted with the right values (reference/seo.md lists what to check). Re-run bash check.sh on the final markdown. Only then is the post itself done.

8. Distribute (this is what earns the traction)

A correct post with no inbound links does not rank. After it ships, seed the first signal: if /x-tweet is available in your environment, run it on the post's core insight for a thread that teaches the idea and links the post; cross-link the post from the relevant docs; and answer the real question it solves where people are already asking it. See the distribution loop in reference/seo.md. Always link the canonical production URL (<your-site-url>/blog/<slug>), never a staging or preview host.

Guardrails

  • Never invent project APIs, flags, or numbers. Read the source and quote it.
  • Never weaken the house voice to sound "professional." Concrete and a little contrarian beats polished and generic every time.
  • Use STE for technical and instructional prose. Do not use figurative language or decorative wording when it can reduce technical clarity.
  • Don't ship a post whose angle overlaps a published one. Adjust the angle instead.
  • Covers can be SVG or a raster image. Match your site's brand palette. If you can't make a good cover, reuse an existing one rather than shipping something ugly.

Note on this skill's own files

The scanner will flag SKILL.md and the reference/ files because they name the banned characters (—) (–) and use → as teaching notation. That's expected. The scanner is for blog drafts and rendered post bodies, not for this skill's documentation.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Transform saved links, papers, articles, posts, videos, and reference collections into approachable AI teaching artifacts for later study. Use when a user wants to queue learning material, create a readable explanation from a source, teach a paper or post step by step, or run an interactive tutor that validates understanding over multiple sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

Inspect an unfamiliar repository, turn a focused Markdown behavior scenario into a deterministic test in the repository's native test stack, run it, and preserve traceability between intent and code. Use when asked to add scenario tests, compile acceptance criteria or Given/When/Then Markdown into executable tests, reproduce a user-visible regression, or convert a narrow workflow specification into stable web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile interaction coverage. Do not use for broad exploratory journeys or agent-judged smoke tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

Apply a disciplined engineering workflow to any code change. Use whenever implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring — before writing code, not after. Walks orient → baseline → smallest change → test → verify → self-review, and enforces language-agnostic hard gates (don't mass-reformat, keep the linter and type-checker clean, keep the build and tests green, make interface changes additive, protect security invariants).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

Create truthful, human-centered marketing campaigns for an app or product, including positioning, channel copy, original artwork, editable layouts, README banners, and selective website integration. Use when asked to make launch materials, promotional artwork, social assets, campaign kits, ads, or marketing content from an existing product; to adapt a visual reference without copying it; or to add approved campaign art to product surfaces. Do not invent claims, fake UI, publish, deploy, or replace product proof without explicit evidence and authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

Create or update a complete repository skill from a user's idea, including the workflow instructions, references, scripts or assets, agent metadata, skill-card artwork, cinematic banner artwork, README links, discovery metadata, and validation. Use when the user asks to create a new skill, add a skill to this collection, turn a workflow into a reusable skill, or make a skill's documentation and artwork consistent with the repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

lead

無料

Use when the user asks to run or continue an autonomous build: turn a goal into an approved plan, dispatch implementation and review agents, and finish with one pull request. The Lead is a provider-neutral orchestrator that makes decisions but never writes code, edits files, runs commands, or reviews its own work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tamdogood/builder-essential-skills2222026年8月17日 更新

tamdogood のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する