Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
When this skill is first invoked without a specific question, respond only with:
I'm ready to help you build fluid, Apple-style interfaces on the web, my knowledge comes from Apple's WWDC design talks, translated for the web.
Do not provide any other information until the user asks a question.
How Apple builds interfaces that stop feeling like a computer and start feeling like an extension of you. This knowledge comes from Apple's WWDC design talks — chiefly Designing Fluid Interfaces (WWDC 2018) — distilled and translated into the web platform (CSS, Pointer Events, requestAnimationFrame, spring libraries like Motion/Framer Motion).
The through-line: an interface feels alive when motion starts from the current on-screen value, inherits the user's velocity, projects momentum forward, and can be grabbed and reversed at any instant. Springs are the tool that makes all of this natural, because they are inherently interruptible and velocity-aware.
"When we align the interface to the way we think and move, something magical happens — it stops feeling like a computer and starts feeling like a seamless extension of us."
An interface is fluid when it behaves like the physical world: things respond instantly, move continuously, carry momentum, resist at boundaries, and can be redirected mid-motion. Everything below is a way to get closer to that.
Apple frames design as serving four human needs: safety/predictability, understanding, achievement, and joy. Every rule here serves one of them.
The moment lag appears, the feeling of directness "falls off a cliff." Response is the foundation everything else is built on.
click/touch-up to show feedback feels dead./* Feedback lives on the press, and it's instant */
.button:active {
transform: scale(0.97);
transition: transform 100ms ease-out;
}
"Touch and content should move together."
When the user drags something, it must stay glued to the finger — and respect the offset from where they grabbed it. Snapping to the element's center on grab breaks the illusion immediately.
setPointerCapture so tracking continues even when the pointer leaves the element's bounds.pointermove events), not just the current point — you'll need velocity at release.el.addEventListener('pointerdown', (e) => {
el.setPointerCapture(e.pointerId);
const grabOffset = e.clientY - el.getBoundingClientRect().top; // respect where they grabbed
// ...track position + timestamp history for velocity
});
"The thought and the gesture happen in parallel."
Every animation must be interruptible and redirectable at any moment. A user must be able to grab a moving element mid-flight and reverse it without waiting for the animation to finish. A closing modal the user grabs again should follow the finger — not finish closing first, then reopen.
@keyframes for anything gesture-driven — they can't be smoothly grabbed and reversed mid-flight. Springs animate from the current value by default, which is exactly what interruption needs."Think of animation as a conversation between you and the object, not something prescribed by the interface."
A pre-scripted, fixed-duration animation can't respond to new input. A spring can — new input just changes the target, and the motion stays continuous. Reach for springs for anything a user can touch.
Apple deliberately replaced the physics triplet (mass/stiffness/damping) with two designer-friendly parameters. Think in these:
1.0 = critically damped, no bounce, smooth settle. < 1.0 = overshoots and oscillates. Lower = bouncier.Defaults:
1.0 (critically damped) — graceful and non-distracting.0.8) only when the gesture itself carried momentum (a flick, a throw, a drag release). Overshoot on a menu that just faded in feels wrong; overshoot on a card you flicked feels right.Concrete values Apple ships:
| Interaction | Damping | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Move / reposition (e.g. PiP) | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Rotation | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Drawer / sheet | 0.8 | 0.3 |
Web mapping (Motion / Framer Motion): the bounce + duration spring API maps closely to Apple's damping + response. A safe house style is damping: 1.0 springs everywhere by default; reserve bounce for momentum-driven, physical interactions.
import { animate } from 'motion';
// Critically damped default (no overshoot)
animate(el, { y: 0 }, { type: 'spring', bounce: 0, duration: 0.4 });
// Momentum interaction — a little bounce, only because a flick preceded it
animate(el, { y: target }, { type: 'spring', bounce: 0.2, duration: 0.4 });
When a gesture ends, the animation must continue at the finger's exact velocity, so there's no visible seam between dragging and animating. This is the detail that most separates "fluid" from "fine."
Pass the pointer's release velocity as the spring's initial velocity. Some spring APIs want relative velocity — normalize it by the remaining distance to the target:
relativeVelocity = gestureVelocity / (targetValue − currentValue)
Example: element at y=50, target y=150 (100px to go), finger moving 50px/s → initial spring velocity = 50 / 100 = 0.5. Framer Motion / Motion take absolute px/s velocity directly (velocity option), so you usually hand it the raw value.
"Take a small input and make a big output."
Don't snap to the nearest boundary from the release point. Use velocity to project the resting position — exactly like scroll deceleration — then snap to the target nearest that projected point. This is what makes a flick feel like it throws the element.
Apple's exact projection function (from the Designing Fluid Interfaces sample code):
// decelerationRate ≈ 0.998 for normal scroll feel; 0.99 for snappier
function project(initialVelocity /* px/s */, decelerationRate = 0.998) {
return (initialVelocity / 1000) * decelerationRate / (1 - decelerationRate);
}
const projectedEndpoint = currentPosition + project(releaseVelocity);
const target = nearestSnapPoint(projectedEndpoint); // choose target from the projection
animateSpringTo(target, { velocity: releaseVelocity }); // then hand off velocity (§5)
Note: the physics-textbook v²/(2·decel) is not what Apple ships — use the exponential-decay form above. This is the standard behavior in good bottom-sheets and carousels (Vaul, Embla).
"If something disappears one way, we expect it to emerge from where it came."
transform-origin to the trigger, so the spatial relationship between button and content is obvious. (This is the same origin-awareness point as popovers scaling from their trigger, not their center.)Humans predict a final state from a trajectory. Intermediate motion should telegraph where things are going — Control Center modules "grow up and out toward your finger." Make the in-between frames point at the outcome, not just interpolate blindly to it.
At an edge, resist progressively instead of stopping hard. A hard stop reads as "frozen"; continuous resistance reads as "responsive, but there's nothing more here." Apply damping that increases the further past the boundary the user drags.
// The further past the bound, the less the element follows — real things slow before they stop
function rubberband(overshoot, dimension, constant = 0.55) {
return (overshoot * dimension * constant) / (dimension + constant * Math.abs(overshoot));
}
swipeleft-type events) — they throw away the continuous tracking you need for feedback.Smoothness is about what's in the frames, not just the frame rate.
requestAnimationFrame is the web's display-synced clock (Apple uses CADisplayLink). Animate only compositor-friendly properties — transform and opacity — and hint with will-change where motion is imminent.Apple uses translucent materials as a floating functional layer that brings structure without stealing focus. On the web, approximate with backdrop-filter.
backdrop-filter: blur() + a semi-transparent background) with content scrolling underneath — not opaque bars that consume a fixed strip..toolbar {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6);
backdrop-filter: blur(20px) saturate(180%);
border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4); /* bright top edge = light catching the material */
}
Three rules for combining senses (from Designing Audio-Haptic Experiences):
Reduced motion doesn't mean no feedback — it means a gentler, non-vestibular equivalent. Respond to three independent signals and bake them into your components:
prefers-reduced-motion: reduce — replace slides/springs/parallax with short opacity cross-fades or static transitions. Drop elastic/overshoot. Keep opacity/color changes that aid comprehension.prefers-reduced-transparency: reduce — make translucent surfaces frostier/solid: raise background opacity, drop the blur.prefers-contrast: more — near-solid backgrounds with a defined, contrasting border.Also: avoid full-viewport moving backgrounds, slow looping oscillations (near 0.2 Hz / one cycle per 5s), and abrupt brightness jumps (ease dark↔light theme changes). Make large moving objects semi-transparent while they travel, and fade big surfaces out during a large reposition and back in once settled.
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
.sheet { transition: opacity 200ms ease; transform: none !important; }
}
@media (prefers-reduced-transparency: reduce) {
.toolbar { background: white; backdrop-filter: none; }
}
Apple designs type to change shape with size; the same discipline applies on the web. (From The Details of UI Typography, WWDC 2020.)
letter-spacing is wrong somewhere. Tighten headings, leave body near 0.rem/em, not fixed px — so a larger font doesn't break the layout.:root { font: 100%/1.5 system-ui, sans-serif; } /* body: system font, comfortable leading */
.display {
font-size: clamp(2rem, 5vw, 4rem);
line-height: 1.05; /* tight leading for large text */
letter-spacing: -0.02em; /* negative tracking as it grows */
font-optical-sizing: auto;
}
The motion and craft above serve Apple's eight design principles (Principles of Great Design, WWDC 2026). Use these as the names you reason with:
Tactical rules that serve these:
| Need | Technique | Concrete value |
|---|---|---|
| Default UI spring | Critically damped, no overshoot | damping 1.0, response 0.3–0.4 |
| Momentum / flick spring | Under-damped, slight bounce | damping ~0.8, response 0.3–0.4 |
| Gesture → spring velocity | Hand off release velocity | gestureVelocity / (target − current) if normalized |
| Flick landing point | Project momentum | current + (v/1000)·d/(1−d), d ≈ 0.998 |
| Interrupt cleanly | Start from presentation (live) value | read the on-screen transform |
| Avoid reversal "brick wall" | Carry velocity through re-target | spring that blends velocity |
| Reversible transition | Mirror the easing curve | inverse cubic-bézier |
| Decide reverse vs. commit | Use velocity sign, not position | at release |
| 1:1 drag | Pointer Events + capture | respect the grab offset |
| Feedback | On pointer-down, continuous | never only at the end |
| Boundary | Rubber-band, don't hard-stop | progressive resistance |
| Translucent chrome | backdrop-filter layer | content scrolls under |
| Type tracking | Size-specific, never fixed | tighten large text (-0.02em), body near 0 |
| Reduced motion | Cross-fade, not slide/spring | @media (prefers-reduced-motion) |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。