本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

decisions-frontier-prep

Use when preparing hardest high-leverage work for a stronger or scarce model, building a ranked execution queue, asking for fable prep, frontier prep, round-collapse, wave queue, or model-upgrade readiness across code, design, copy, marketing, or architecture work.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • references/harness-adapters.md1.0 KB
  • references/queue-schema.md1.2 KB
  • references/scoring.md579 B
  • scripts/score_frontier_queue.py1.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Decisions Frontier Prep

Use this to turn broad, difficult work into a small set of execution-ready packets for the best available model. The core rule is selection: keep only work where a stronger model plausibly collapses multiple iterate/fix rounds or raises the quality ceiling.

Workflow

  1. Detect the target harness, project, active board, and candidate repos. Use Decisions project context first; fall back to local git repos only when no board/project context exists.
  2. Run a broad diagnosis by domain: security, correctness, performance, architecture, design, copy, marketing, and tech debt.
  3. Reject phantom work. Every finding must be verified against live files, current tickets, or an explicit source artifact before it becomes a packet.
  4. Write packets using references/queue-schema.md. Each packet needs concrete files or artifacts, an operation, acceptance criteria, and a machine check.
  5. Score with scripts/score_frontier_queue.py or the scoring rules in references/scoring.md.
  6. Group packets into waves. Wave 1 should be high score and low dependency so it can prove the queue quickly.
  7. For DecisionsAI workflows, attach the queue artifact path to the workflow result and keep execution gated by the board/workflow owner.

Harness Rules

  • Read references/harness-adapters.md before emitting harness-specific instructions.
  • Do not assume a slash command, a single CLI, or a specific model provider.
  • Use Decisions workflow pre_chain skills for execution context. Do not silently add this skill to default pre_chain.
  • Keep AgentManager-style multi-agent spawning out of scope; Decisions keeps one operating agent per board.

Safety

  • Archive instead of deleting.
  • Never loosen sandbox, permission, branch, or deployment rules to make a packet easier.
  • Do not queue work whose machine check is only "agent says done."
  • Route work that a normal model can one-shot to ordinary board tickets, not the frontier queue.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する