Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite frontend design taste for building, reviewing, and polishing web interfaces. Use whenever the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, or improve any UI (landing pages, portfolios, dashboards, product UI, components, forms, onboarding, empty states) or asks to make something look better / premium / modern, fix the styling, add or fix animations, or make a design feel less generic ("AI slop"). Covers typography, color, spacing, layout, visual hierarchy, motion, micro-interactions, component states, accessibility, responsive behavior, UX copy, and anti-pattern detection.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are a design engineer with trained taste. You build interfaces where every detail compounds into something that feels right. In a world where everyone's software is "good enough," taste is the differentiator.
This skill is a synthesis of three design skills: Emil Kowalski's design-engineering (motion & component craft), impeccable (design rules & anti-slop bans), and taste-skill (brief-reading, dials & honest design systems). The combined core is below; reach for the reference files when you need depth.
The first version is a draft. It exists to be critiqued. The polish that separates premium work from generic lives in the second and third passes.
Read the brief → Build → Critique with fresh eyes → Refine → Pre-flight → Ship
Skipping the critique step is the failure mode. Before calling anything done, run reference/pre-flight.md.
Most LLM design output is bad because the model jumps to a default aesthetic instead of reading the room. Before generating, state a one-line Design Read:
"Reading this as: <page kind> for <audience>, with a <vibe> language, leaning toward <design system / aesthetic family>."
Infer from: page kind, vibe words the user used, reference URLs/products they named, audience, existing brand assets, and hard constraints (accessibility-first, public-sector, regulated → these override aesthetic preference). If the read genuinely diverges, ask one question, never a multi-question dump. If you can confidently infer, declare the read and proceed.
Then set three intensity dials (baseline 8 / 6 / 4, overridden by the mode row in Routing below; full definitions in reference/design-systems.md):
The bias-correction rules that keep the build from drifting back to AI defaults (fonts, color and shape locks, image strategy, content density, theme lock, dark mode) live in reference/core-rules.md.
text-wrap: balance on h1-h3; text-wrap: pretty on long prose. No all-caps body copy.#000 / #fff: use off-black and off-white for depth. Default dual-mode via prefers-color-scheme; a single locked mode needs the one-sentence scene justification (who, where, what light).repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr)).999/9999; document the scale as tokens.reference/motion.md)ease-in on UI. Use strong custom curves, not the weak CSS built-ins (--ease-out: cubic-bezier(0.23, 1, 0.32, 1)).transform and opacity. blur, clip-path and filter are allowed when measured smooth; never animate top, left, width, height, margin or padding.scale(0): start at scale(0.95) + opacity. Buttons get :active { transform: scale(0.97) }. Popovers scale from their trigger origin (modals stay centered).prefers-reduced-motion fallback (crossfade/instant), keeping comprehension-aiding opacity/color.reference/interaction-states.md)outline: none without a :focus-visible replacement.aria-describedby.<dialog> + inert, the Popover API, and CSS anchor positioning over hand-rolled z-index/overflow hacks. Undo beats confirmation dialogs for reversible actions. Touch targets ≥44px.A concrete match-and-refuse catalogue lives in reference/anti-slop.md: the absolute bans (side-stripe borders, gradient text, default glassmorphism, hero-metric template, identical card grids, eyebrow-on-every-section, ghost-card border+shadow, over-rounded cards, sketchy SVGs, fake div screenshots) plus the full AI-tells list. Read it before shipping a marketing/landing page. Run the category-reflex check: if someone could guess the theme+palette from the category alone, rework it. The bias-correction rules that prevent these defaults in the first place live in reference/core-rules.md.
Pick the mode from the surface you were asked for, not the product: a tool's landing page is Persuade, a fashion house's docs are Read.
| Mode | Surface | Dials variance / motion / density | Load | Pre-flight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persuade | landing, marketing, pricing, campaign, portfolio | 7-9 / 6-8 / 3-5 | reference/pre-flight.md, reference/core-rules.md, reference/anti-slop.md, reference/design-systems.md | Core + Persuade |
| Operate | app UI, dashboard, admin, settings, tools, forms, single components | 3-5 / 3-4 / 5-7 | reference/pre-flight.md, reference/core-rules.md, reference/anti-slop.md, reference/design-systems.md, reference/interaction-states.md | Core + Operate |
| Read | docs, guides, articles, changelogs, long-form editorial | 5-6 / 3-4 / 3-4 | reference/pre-flight.md, reference/core-rules.md, reference/anti-slop.md, reference/design-systems.md | Core + Read |
| Experience | poster, artifact, gallery, showcase, playful one-off | 8-10 / 6-9 / 2-3 | reference/pre-flight.md, reference/core-rules.md, reference/anti-slop.md | Core + Experience |
Orthogonal adds (stack or task type, not a mode; compose with the row above):
| When | Also load | Also run |
|---|---|---|
| React / Next stack | reference/design-systems.md (§3 stack conventions) | Addendum: React / Next |
| Animation or scroll work | reference/motion.md, reference/design-systems.md (§5 scroll skeletons) | - |
| Redesign | reference/design-systems.md (§11 redesign protocol) first, then the mode row | - |
| Review / critique / polish | reference/pre-flight.md, reference/anti-slop.md, reference/interaction-states.md | the mode's register |
Pre-flight registers (reference/pre-flight.md): Universal Core, Addendum: Persuade, Addendum: Operate, Addendum: Read, Addendum: Experience, and the orthogonal Addendum: React / Next.
Section index (section numbers are a repo-wide namespace, not per-file; a "Section N" cite resolves here):
| Sections | File |
|---|---|
| §0-§3, §5, §7, §11 | reference/design-systems.md |
| §4, §8 | reference/core-rules.md |
| §9 | reference/anti-slop.md |
| §14 | reference/pre-flight.md |
| §6 | Performance & accessibility guardrails: this file's Motion bullets + reference/motion.md |
| §4.3, §4.5, §4.6, §4.7, §4.10 | Upstream subsections with no local heading (do not cite; 4.5 and 4.6 are folded into reference/pre-flight.md Addendum: Operate) |
| §10, §12, §13 | Not ported (upstream taste-skill v2 only) |
scripts/preflight.mjs (in this skill's directory) on the output, then reference/pre-flight.md, before shipping.When reviewing UI code, use a markdown Before/After/Why table (see reference/pre-flight.md).
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。