本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

email-ops

Evidence-first mailbox triage, drafting, send verification, and sent-mail-safe follow-up workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to organize email, draft or send through the real mail surface, or prove what landed in Sent.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Email Ops

Use this when the real task is mailbox work: triage, drafting, replying, sending, or proving a message landed in Sent.

This is not a generic writing skill. It is an operator workflow around the actual mail surface.

Skill Stack

Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:

  • brand-voice before drafting anything user-facing
  • investor-outreach for investor, partner, or sponsor-facing mail
  • customer-billing-ops when the thread is a billing/support incident rather than generic correspondence
  • knowledge-ops when the message or thread should be captured into durable context afterward
  • research-ops when a reply depends on fresh external facts

When to Use

  • user asks to triage inbox or archive low-signal mail
  • user wants a draft, reply, or new outbound email
  • user wants to know whether a mail was already sent
  • the user wants proof of which account, thread, or Sent entry was used

Guardrails

  • draft first unless the user clearly asked for a live send
  • never claim a message was sent without a real Sent-folder or client-side confirmation
  • do not switch sender accounts casually; choose the account that matches the project and recipient
  • do not delete uncertain business mail during cleanup
  • if the task is really DM or iMessage work, hand off to messages-ops

Workflow

1. Resolve the exact surface

Before acting, settle:

  • which mailbox account
  • which thread or recipient
  • whether the task is triage, draft, reply, or send
  • whether the user wants draft-only or live send

2. Read the thread before composing

If replying:

  • read the existing thread
  • identify the last outbound touch
  • identify any commitments, deadlines, or unanswered questions

If creating a new outbound:

  • identify warmth level
  • select the correct channel and sender account
  • pull brand-voice before drafting

3. Draft, then verify

For draft-only work:

  • produce the final copy
  • state sender, recipient, subject, and purpose

For live-send work:

  • verify the exact final body first
  • send through the chosen mail surface
  • confirm the message landed in Sent or the equivalent sent-copy store

4. Report exact state

Use exact status words:

  • drafted
  • approval-pending
  • sent
  • blocked
  • awaiting verification

If the send surface is blocked, preserve the draft and report the exact blocker instead of improvising a second transport without saying so.

Output Format

MAIL SURFACE
- account
- thread / recipient
- requested action

DRAFT
- subject
- body

STATUS
- drafted / sent / blocked
- proof of Sent when applicable

NEXT STEP
- send
- follow up
- archive / move

Pitfalls

  • do not claim send success without a sent-copy check
  • do not ignore the thread history and write a contextless reply
  • do not mix mailbox work with DM or text-message workflows
  • do not expose secrets, auth details, or unnecessary message metadata

Verification

  • the response names the account and thread or recipient
  • any send claim includes Sent proof or an explicit client-side confirmation
  • the final state is one of drafted / sent / blocked / awaiting verification

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する